- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02777541
Evaluation of Tolerance and Safety of Early Enteral Nutrition in Children After Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Placement
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
This study is a multicentre, randomized, open label trial designed to evaluate the tolerance and safety of early enteral nutrition after PEG placement in children. Recruitment will be from patients attending the one of six medical centers in Poland: Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Feeding Disorders and Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Memorial Health Institute in Warsaw, Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Medical University of Gdańsk in Gdańsk, Department of Allergology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Medical University in Łódź, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice and Department of Pediatrics and Gastroenterology, Area Hospital in Torus.
The trial will include 100 patients, from 1-month-old to 18-year-old, qualified for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement. All participants will be prepared for the procedure according to the standard medical protocol.
Parents/legal guardians, and where possible also the patient, will be informed about the research plan, and after signed informed consent to participate in the study patients will be enrolled for the study. At the Baseline visit participants will be randomized (1:1) to one of two treatment group: Group I- early enteral feeding group (3 hours after PEG implantation) or Group II- late enteral feeding group (8 hours after PEG implantation). The follow-up visits in hospital is planned 3, 6, 9 mad 12 months after the procedure in all subjects.
Primary endpoint:
1. Number of patients who will achieve full feed (total fluid and caloric requirements) within 48 hours since the first feeding bolus.
Secondary endpoints:
- Number of early complications (to 6 days after PEG placement)
- Number of late complications ( 7 days - 12 months after PEG placement)
- Duration of hospitalization after PEG placement (in days)
- Gastric residuals (ml) - sum up to 48 hours since the first feeding bolus
Tertiary endpoints:
- Improvement in nutritional status (3,6,9,12 months after the procedure) - body weight gain (kg) and height gain (cm), BMI kg/m2
- Influence of vitamin and trace element deficiency (vitamin D - 25(OH)D3, vitamin A, vitamin E, sodium, potassium, calcium, zinc, iron, magnesium, selenium) and other biochemical parameters abnormalities (serum level of urea, total protein, albumin, glucose, glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin HbA1c), aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine transaminase (ALT), ferritin, C reactive protein) on complications rate.
- Influence of ghrelin, leptin and adiponectin level on nutritional status improvement after PEG placement.
- Influence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) diagnosed before the procedure on feeding tolerance.
- Corelation between fecal calprotectin level and feeding tolerance after PEG placement, complication rate and nutritional status before PEG placement.
- Influence of oropharyngeal flora on complications rate (wound infection)
- Correlation between PEG placement and GER.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Warsaw, Poland, 04-730
- Recruiting
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Feeding Disorders
-
Principal Investigator:
- Jaroslaw Kierkus, Md PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects between 1 month-old and 18 years-old
- Medical indications for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement.
- Informed consent to participate in the study signed and dated by the subject's parent/legal guardian and the also by patient over the age of 16 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Serious, uncorrectable coagulation disorders.
- Inability to perform upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series endoscopy (laryngeal or oesophageal stricture)
- Need for concomitant fundoplication.
- Lack of technical ability to perform PEG placement procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
OTHER: Early enteral nutrition
3 hours after PEG implantation
|
The first feeding will be with polymeric diet (1 kcal/ml).
First feeding portion will have the volume equal to 1/3 of full recommended portion, volume of second feeding will be equal to 2/3 of full recommended portion and third portion will be equal to full recommended portion.
Each portion will introduced thru the enteral feeding pump (Flocare Infinity, Nutricia), for 30 minutes, three-hour break between feeds.
Infusion of 5% glucose solution with electrolytes will be given through intravenous line to cover maintenance fluid requirement in all subjects.
|
OTHER: Late enteral nutrition
8 hours after PEG implantation
|
The first feeding will be with polymeric diet (1 kcal/ml).
First feeding portion will have the volume equal to 1/3 of full recommended portion, volume of second feeding will be equal to 2/3 of full recommended portion and third portion will be equal to full recommended portion.
Each portion will introduced thru the enteral feeding pump (Flocare Infinity, Nutricia), for 30 minutes, three-hour break between feeds.
Infusion of 5% glucose solution with electrolytes will be given through intravenous line to cover maintenance fluid requirement in all subjects.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Number of patients who will achieve full feed (total fluid and caloric requirements) within 48 hours since the first feeding bolus.
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
48 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Number of early complications (to 6 days after PEG placement)
Time Frame: to 6 days after PEG placement
|
to 6 days after PEG placement
|
Number of late complications ( 7 days - 12 months after PEG placement)
Time Frame: 7 days- 12 months after PEG placement
|
7 days- 12 months after PEG placement
|
Number of hospitalization days after PEG placement
Time Frame: up to 30 days
|
up to 30 days
|
Gastric residuals (ml) - sum up to 48 hours since the first feeding bolus
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
48 hours
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Improvement in nutritional status
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of patients with nutritional status improvement after PEG placement
|
12 months
|
Influence of vitamin and trace element deficiency on complications rate.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of patients with vitamin and trace deficiency before PEG placement who had diagnosed post PEG placement early or late complication.
|
12 months
|
Influence of ghrelin, leptin and adiponectin level on nutritional status
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of patients with incorrect ghrelin, leptin or adiponectin level with no post PEG nutritional improvement
|
12 months
|
Influence of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) diagnosed before the procedure on feeding tolerance.
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of patients with diagnosed pre PEG GER with no post PEG nutritional improvement
|
12 months
|
Corelation between fecal calprotectin level and feeding tolerance after PEG placement
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of patients with elevated calprotectin level before PEG placement who had post PEG placement enteral feeding intolerance
|
12 months
|
Influence of oropharyngeal flora on complications rate (wound infection)
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of patients with abnormal oropharyngeal flora with post PEG wound infection
|
12 months
|
Correlation between PEG placement and GER
Time Frame: 12 months
|
number of patients with post PEG GER
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Wiernicka A, Matuszczyk M, Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz A, Landowski P, Toporowska-Kowalska E, Gebora-Kowalska B, Popinska K, Sibilska M, Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk U, Wiecek S, Hapyn E, Blimke-Koziel K, Kierkus J. Tolerability and safety of early enteral nutrition in children after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement: A multicentre randomised controlled trial. Clin Nutr. 2019 Aug;38(4):1544-1548. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
- Wiernicka A, Matuszczyk M, Szlagatys-Sidorkiewicz A, Toporowska-Kowalska E, Popinska K, Chlebowczyk-Grzybowska U, Hapyn E, Kierkus J. The protocol for a randomised-controlled trial of the evaluation of the tolerance and safety of early enteral nutrition in children after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. (protocol version 09.01.2015). BMC Pediatr. 2016 Oct 7;16(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0705-8.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- RG 1/2014
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Enteral Nutritional Support
-
University Hospital, LilleMinistry of Health, FranceTerminatedGastrointestinal Fistula | Enteral Nutritional SupportFrance
-
Hospital Universitario San IgnacioWithdrawnCritical Illness | Enteral Feeding Intolerance | Nutrition SupportColombia
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. MatteoRecruitingNutritional SupportItaly
-
University of MichiganChildren's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityTerminatedEnteral Nutrition | Enteral Feeding | Gastrostomy TubeUnited States
-
Federal University of Mato GrossoCompletedPerioperative Care | Arthroplasty, Hip Replacement | Nutritional SupportBrazil
-
Jinling Hospital, ChinaXijing Hospital; Changhai Hospital; Peking Union Medical College Hospital; Chinese... and other collaboratorsCompletedClinical Outcomes | General Surgery | Nutrition Assessment | Nutritional SupportChina
-
Jinling Hospital, ChinaCompletedMuscle Loss | Nutritional Support
-
University Hospital, LilleBaxter Healthcare Corporation; Dim3Not yet recruitingNutritional Support
-
Yale UniversityEnrolling by invitationNutrition Disorders | Enteral FeedingUnited States
-
Xian-Jun YuNot yet recruitingEnteral NutritionChina
Clinical Trials on Resumption of feeding 3 hours after PEG placement
-
Odense University HospitalUnknown
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)CompletedBlood Pressure | Telemedicine | Psychosocial Impairment | Stroke PreventionUnited States
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompletedOsteoarthritis, KneeTaiwan
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkCompletedTotal Hip ReplacementUnited States
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedCrowns (MeSH Unique ID: D003442), Single Tooth | Dental Porcelain (MeSH Unique ID: D003776)
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterCompletedSolid TumorsUnited States
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingBreast Cancer | Atrophic VaginitisUnited States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingT Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | T Lymphoblastic LymphomaUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingB Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Central Nervous System Leukemia | Testicular Leukemia | B Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, BCR-ABL1-LikeUnited States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Australia, New Zealand, Switzerland, Ireland
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingB Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia | Acute Leukemia of Ambiguous Lineage | Mixed Phenotype Acute LeukemiaUnited States, Canada, Puerto Rico, Australia