The SPACER Trial - Repair of Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Using the Edwards TricuSPid TrAnsCatheter REpaiR System (SPACER)

April 4, 2022 updated by: Edwards Lifesciences
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and device performance of the Edwards Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System in patients with clinically significant, symptomatic, tricuspid regurgitation who are at high surgical risk for standard tricuspid repair/replacement.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The purpose of the study is to assess the safety and device performance of the Edwards Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System in patients with clinically significant, symptomatic, tricuspid regurgitation who are at high surgical risk for standard tricuspid repair/replacement. The study is a multi-center, international, prospective, single arm, safety study. Enrolled subjects will be assessed for clinical follow-up at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year and annually for 3 years post implant procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec-Université Laval
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E 1M7
        • St. Paul's Hospital, Providence Health Care Research Institute
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 2C4
        • Toronto General Hospital
      • Massy, France, 91300
        • Institut Hospitalier Jacques Cartier
      • Rouen, France, 76031
        • Hopital Charles Nicolle
      • Bad Krozingen, Germany, 79189
        • Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg - Bad Krozingen
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Charite-Universitätsmedzin Berlin
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20099
        • Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
      • Munich, Germany, 81377
        • Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilian University
      • Athens, Greece, 15123
        • Hygeia Hospital
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Signed and dated Ethics Committee (EC) approved study consent form prior to study related procedures
  2. Eighteen years of age or older
  3. Clinically significant, symptomatic (New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater), tricuspid regurgitation (per applicable guidelines) requiring tricuspid valve repair or replacement as assessed by the Heart Team
  4. Functional tricuspid regurgitation as the primary etiology
  5. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater or signs of persistent right heart failure despite optimal medical therapy
  6. Determined by the 'HEART Team' (a minimum of one Cardiologist, and one Cardiac Surgeon) to be at high surgical risk for tricuspid valve repair or replacement and the benefit-risk analysis supports utilization of the investigational device
  7. Willing to attend study follow-up assessments for up to 3 years

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Tricuspid valve/right heart anatomy not suitable for the study device:

    1. Native tricuspid annulus area < 2.14 cm2 (9 mm device) or < 2.63 cm2 (12 mm device) or < 3.27cm2 (15 mm device) as measured by transthoracic echocardiography
    2. Sub-valvular structures/anatomy that would preclude from proper anchor or coaptation device placement, positioning and retrieval
    3. Access pathway vessel diameter less than 7.1 mm (9, 12 mm and 15 mm devices)
  2. Moderate or greater tricuspid valve stenosis
  3. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring immediate revascularization
  4. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure performed within 30 days of the scheduled implant procedure
  5. Patients not already receiving dialysis with renal insufficiency (eGFR <25) per lab test ≤ 48 hours prior to scheduled implant procedure
  6. Myocardial infarction within 30 days of scheduled implant procedure
  7. Hemodynamic instability within 30 days of scheduled implant procedure
  8. Patient requiring surgery under general anesthesia for any reason within 90 days of scheduled implant procedure
  9. Severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction < 25% within 90 days of scheduled implant procedure
  10. Patients with pulmonary artery systolic pressure > 70 mmHg via transthoracic echocardiography or alternative standard modality (e.g., direct pressure measurement) within 90 days
  11. Concomitant clinically significant valve (aortic, mitral, or pulmonic) disease requiring immediate (± 30 days of study procedure) repair or replacement
  12. Active endocarditis or infection within 3 months of scheduled implant procedure
  13. Cerebrovascular accident within 3 months of scheduled implant procedure
  14. Non-cardiac disease limiting life expectancy to be less than 12 months at baseline evaluation
  15. Documented history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy or gastrointestinal bleeding within 3 months of scheduled implant procedure
  16. Evidence of right sided intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
  17. Prior venous stent placed within the access route (e.g., sub-clavian vein) that could negatively react with device
  18. Previously treated tricuspid valve which included implantation of a bioprosthetic valve or mechanical valve
  19. Known hypersensitivity to cobalt chromium, nitinol or titanium
  20. Known hypersensitivity to anticoagulation therapy or contrast agent, which cannot be adequately medicated
  21. Patient is a current intravenous drug user
  22. Female of child-bearing potential is pregnant or lactating
  23. Patient is currently participating or has participated in another investigational drug or device clinical study within 30 days of study screening activity
  24. Patient requires emergent/emergency treatment for tricuspid insufficiency
  25. Patient is under guardianship

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EW Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System
Edwards (EW) Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System
Treatment with the EW Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause Mortality
Time Frame: At 30 days.
The primary endpoint for the study will assess the all-cause mortality of the as treated cohort at 30 days compared to a literature derived Performance Goal based on high-risk surgical outcomes for tricuspid repair/replacement. Due to the early termination of the study, the desired statistical power was not attained and thus this comparison analysis was not performed. All-cause mortality is presented below as a number of deaths and percentage of patients only.
At 30 days.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Technical Success
Time Frame: Implant Procedure

Alive, with

  • Successful access, delivery and removal of the delivery systems, and
  • Deployment and correct positioning of the intended device, and
  • No need for additional emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure
Implant Procedure
Device Success
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years

Alive, with

  • Original intended device in place, and
  • No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to the device, and
  • Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) reduction compared to baseline and Tricuspid Valve (TV) gradient ≤ 5 mmHg
At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2, and 3 years
Procedural Success
Time Frame: At 1 month

Device Success, and

None of the following device or procedure related Serious Adverse Events (SAE):

  • Life threatening bleeding
  • Major vascular or cardiac structural complications requiring intervention
  • Pericardial effusion requiring drainage or surgery (includes tamponade)
  • Stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (includes new dialysis).
  • Severe heart failure or hypotension requiring Intravenous (IV) inotrope, ultrafiltration or mechanical circulatory support
  • Prolonged intubation > 48 hours
At 1 month
Clinical Outcomes [Heart Failure Re-Hospitalization Rates]
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Re-hospitalization rates for the underlying condition (heart failure)
At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Tricuspid Regurgitation Re-Intervention Rates]
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Re-intervention rates for the underlying condition (tricuspid regurgitation)
At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Changes in Peripheral Edema]
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Change in peripheral edema as assessed by subject weight loss (kilograms) compared to baseline
At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class]
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years

Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class compared to baseline

Measure Description:

Measure Description: NYHA Classification - The stages of heart failure:

Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II - Mild symptoms and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms, even during less-than-ordinary activity. Comfortable only at rest.

Class IV - Severe limitations. Experiences symptoms even while at rest.

At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in 6 Minute Walk Test Distance]
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Change in 6 minute walk test distance (meters) compared to baseline
At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in Quality of Life Short Form (SF)-12 Questionnaire]
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the Short Form (SF)-12 questionnaire compared to baseline The SF-12 is a short survey with 12 questions that results in two scales of mental and physical functioning and overall health related quality of life. The SF-12 Score is scaled from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Clinical Outcomes [Change in Quality of Life Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)]
Time Frame: At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years
Change in Quality of Life as assessed by the KCCQ questionnaire compared to baseline The KCCQ is a 12-item questionnaire that quantifies physical limitations, symptoms, self-sufficiency, social interaction and quality of life. The KCCQ scale is 0-100. An increase in the KCCQ-12 score reflects an improvement in symptoms for the subject. A mean difference over time of 5 points on the KCCQ-12 summary score reflects a clinically significant change in heart failure status.
At 1 month, 6 months, 1, 2 and 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 14, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 11, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 1, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 4, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-09

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on EW Tricuspid Transcatheter Repair System

Subscribe