Telemedicine Program in Type 1 Diabetes and CSII

Randomized Crossover Clinical Trial in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Treated With Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion to Assess the Impact of Telemedicine vs. Conventional Medical Care. Integral Clinical Impact and Cost

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease of high socio-health relevance for their clinical and economic implications (risk of complications, disability ...) (healthcare costs). Strict glycemic control and intensive treatment and support have shown long-term patient with type 1 diabetes mellitus (DM1) improved health. The intensive insulin therapy involves the administration of insulin through 3 or more injections per day (MDI), or through a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). New technologies applied to the treatment of DM1, such as telemedicine, could bring benefits to patients. The available scientific evidence to date shows that telemedicine systems have beneficial or neutral effects on glycemic control, expressed in terms of HbA1c in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with MDI or CSII. They have also shown not to worsen the quality of life and reduce the costs associated with the care of these subjects. However, studies published to date are generally short follow-up, small sample size, and have not evaluated other biological parameters such as glycemic variability, inflammatory markers and markers of oxidative stress as well as a psychological assessment including depression, anxiety, Diabetes-related distress and fear of hypoglycemia. It has been designed a randomized crossover 18 months in order to study the effect of a telemedicine program in a group of subjects with DM1 in CSII on clinical variables of metabolic control variables, including parameters of glycemic variability, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress, psychological variables and quality of life, and associated costs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Randomized crossover clinical trial about the impact of a telemedicine program (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) vs. the conventional medical follow-face of 18 months for the care of patients with DM1 intensive treatment with CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®, Roche SL).

Two groups: one group with interactive clinical monitoring through a telemedicine platform (TM) and other conventional medical follow-up group (SMC) during 6 months. Being a crossover trial, both groups passing through both conditions (TM and SMC) during 6 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 85 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 diabetes over 2 years of development with C plasma levels <0.5 ng / ml, and ISCI treated for> 6 months peptide.
  • Age between 16 and 65 years (inclusive).
  • HbA1c <10%.
  • Absence of concomitant drug therapy that could affect blood glucose levels.
  • Absence of chronic renal failure, abnormal liver function tests, thyroid disease active (except properly replaced hypothyroidism).
  • Absence of acute decompensation Ketotic at baseline.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • type 2 diabetes.
  • type 1 diabetes treated with multiple daily insulin injections.
  • Women pregnant or planning pregnancy.
  • severe macrovascular or microvascular complications
  • disabling psychological disorders.
  • No collaboration (not signed informed consent).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group 1a. Control
Treatment with CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and follow-face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months).
Treatment with CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and follow-face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months).
Other: Group 2a. Telemedicine program
CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
CSII (Accu-Chek Spirit®) and medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
Other: Group 1b. Telemedicine program
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 1 begins with medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 1 begins with medical monitoring via telematics application (Emminens Conecta® System, Roche Diagnostics SL) (TM) (6 months).
Other: Group 2b. Control
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 2 begins with face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months).
After a washout period of 3 months and the crossing, Group 2 begins with face doctor visits (conventional treatment -SMC-) (6 months) .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of clinical and metabolic parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin-HbA1c- and glycemic variability-SD-).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of clinical and metabolic parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin-HbA1c- and glycemic variability-SD-).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Assessment of inflammatory markers (hs-CRP).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (IL-6).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (TNF-α).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (MCP-1).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of inflammatory markers (hs-CRP).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of inflammatory markers (IL-6).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of inflammatory markers (TNF-α).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of inflammatory markers (MCP-1).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of redox markers (CAT).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of redox markers (TBARS).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of redox markers (oxidized LDL).
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of redox markers (CAT).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of redox markers (TBARS).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of redox markers (oxidized LDL).
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of quality of life with the DQOL
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of quality of life with the DQOL
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of depression with the BDI-II
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of depression with the BDI-II
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of anxiety with the STAI
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of anxiety with the STAI
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of distress related to diabetes with the DDS
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of distress related to diabetes with the DDS
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of treatment satisfaction with the DTSQ
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of treatment satisfaction with the DTSQ
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of fear of hypoglycemia with the FH-15
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Baseline: Group 1 and 2
Assessment of fear of hypoglycemia with the FH-15
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of cost-effectiveness with a structured interview designed by our research group of direct and indirect costs.
Time Frame: Baseline: Group 1 and 2; 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Baseline: Group 1 and 2; 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
Assessment of cost-effectiveness with a structured interview designed by our research group of direct and indirect costs.
Time Frame: 6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)
6 months: Control (Group1a+Group 2b) vs Telemedicine ( Group 2a+ Group1b)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Soledad Ruiz de Adana, MD, PhD, Andaluz Health Service

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

September 19, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 6, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2017

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

Clinical Trials on Group 1a. Control

3
Subscribe