Efficacy and Safety of Atacicept in IgA Nephropathy

A Phase II Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Atacicept in IgA Nephropathy

This main purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, dose response and efficacy of Atacicept in participants with IgA nephropathy and persistent proteinuria. The study hypothesis was that treatment with Atacicept would reduce proteinuria compared to placebo.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

16

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bunkyo-ku, Japan, 113-8431
        • Juntendo University Hospital - Dept of Nephrology/Hypertension
      • Leicester, United Kingdom, LE5 4PW
        • University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust - ULTIMATE PARENT
    • Arizona
      • Glendale, Arizona, United States, 85308
        • AKDHC Medical Research Services, LLC.
    • California
      • Chula Vista, California, United States, 91910
        • California Institute of Renal Research - Chula Vista Location
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
        • Colorado Kidney Care PC - Dr. Marder
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20037
        • Medical Faculty Associates
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30909
        • Southeastern Clinical Research Institute, LLC
      • Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States, 30046
        • GA Nephrology Associates
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70121
        • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • The Johns Hopkins Hospital
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
        • Brookview Hills Research Associates, LLC
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
        • Ohio State University Clinical Trials Management Office - Ohio State CTMO Parent
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18017
        • Northeast Clinical Research Center, LLC
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37404
        • Southeast Renal Research Institute
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
        • Nephrotex Research Group
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
        • Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center & Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Greater than or equal to (>=)18 years of age
  • Biopsy-proven Immunoglobulin (IgA) nephropathy
  • Urine Protein to Creatinine Ratio (UPCR) >= 0.75 and <= 6 milligram per milligram (mg/mg) during screening
  • Stable and optimal dose of Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and/or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) at least 8 weeks prior to screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant significant renal disease other than IgA nephropathy
  • IgA nephropathy with significant glomerulosclerosis or cortical scarring
  • Diagnosis of Henoch-Schonlein purpura
  • Failure to meet estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and biopsy requirement criteria
  • Serum IgG below 6 grams per liter (g/L)
  • Use of cyclophosphamide ever or use of other immunosuppressants or systemic corticosteroids within 4 months
  • Active infection requiring hospitalization or treatment with parenteral anti-infectives within 4 weeks
  • History, or current diagnosis, of active tuberculosis (TB), or untreated latent TB infection
  • History of or positive HIV and/or positive for hepatitis B or Hepatitis C at screening
  • History of malignancy
  • Nursing or pregnancy
  • Any condition, including any uncontrolled disease state other than IgA nephropathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Placebo
Participants received placebo matched to Atacicept once weekly as subcutaneous (SC) injection during this study up to a maximum of 72.1 weeks.
Experimental: Atacicept 75 mg
Participants received 75 mg of Atacicept once weekly as SC injection during this study up to a maximum of 74.1 weeks.
Experimental: Atacicept 25 mg
Participants received 25 milligrams (mg) of Atacicept once weekly as SC injection during this study up to a maximum of 73.6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESIs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation and TEAEs Leading to Death
Time Frame: Baseline up to 96 weeks
Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a study drug, which does not necessarily had a causal relationship with this treatment. Serious AE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAEs: AEs that developed or worsened/became serious during on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study [Week 96]). TEAEs included serious AEs and non- serous AEs. AESIs included infections, cardiac failure, cardiomyopathy/ ischemic heart disease, hypersensitivity reaction (including anaphylactic/anaphylactoid shock conditions, asthma/bronchospasm, and angioedema), injection site reactions (ISRs) and demyelinating disorders. Investigator or his /her designee assessed ISRs as local reactions (redness, bruising, swelling, induration and itching).
Baseline up to 96 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Serum Atacicept Concentrations
Time Frame: Week 0 Day 1 (pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 40, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and Post-treatment (PT) Follow Up (FU) Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Serum Atacicept Concentrations was to be performed; however; as per changed in planned analysis the outcome measure related to pharmacokinetic parameters was not assessed.
Week 0 Day 1 (pre-dose), Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 40, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and Post-treatment (PT) Follow Up (FU) Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Change From Baseline Levels in Serum Immunoglobulin A (IgA)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and PT FU Weeks 4, 12 and 24
The change in serum levels of IgA from baseline was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and PT FU Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Change From Baseline Levels in Serum Iimmunoglobulin G (IgG)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and PT FU Weeks 4, 12 and 24
The change in serum levels of IgG from baseline was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and PT FU Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Change From Baseline Levels in Serum Immunoglobulin M (IgM)
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and at PT FU Weeks 4, 12 and 24
The change in serum levels of IgM from baseline was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 32, 40, 48, 60, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and at PT FU Weeks 4, 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Serum Galactose Deficient-IgA1 (Gd-IgA1) Levels
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72 and at PT FU Weeks 12 and 24
The change in serum Gd-IgA1 from baseline was reported.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72 and at PT FU Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Serum Complement C3 and C4 Levels
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12, 24, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and at PT FU Weeks 12 and 24
The change in serum component C3 and C4 from baseline were reported.
Baseline, Week 12, 24, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and at PT FU Weeks 12 and 24
Change From Baseline in Immune Cell Subsets by Flow Cytometry Analysis
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and at PT FU Week 24
Change from baseline in immune cell subsets included total T cells, helper T cells, cytotoxic T cells, total B cells (assay with [AW] CD45 or assay without [AWO] CD45), mature naïve B cells, memory B cells, plasma cells, plasma blasts, and natural killer (NK) cells and were reported. Analysis was performed by flow cytometry analysis.
Baseline, Weeks 4, 12, 24, 48, 72, Early Termination (up to Week 72) and at PT FU Week 24
Change From Baseline in Urinary IgG, IgA, and IgM Levels
Time Frame: Baseline (Day1), Weeks 24, 48 and Early Termination (up to earlier than Week 72)
Urinary IgG, IgA and IgM levels to be measured by Immuno-Electrophoresis.
Baseline (Day1), Weeks 24, 48 and Early Termination (up to earlier than Week 72)
Percentage of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA)
Time Frame: Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)
Percentage of participants with positive ADA were reported.
Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormalities in Laboratory Assessments
Time Frame: Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)
Laboratory investigation included hematology, biochemistry, urinalysis and Urine sediment analysis. Clinical significance was to be decided by the investigator.
Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormalities in Vital Signs
Time Frame: Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)
Vital signs included body temperature, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, weight and height. The systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate was measured after the participants have in a rested at least 3 minutes in seated position. Clinical significance was to be decided by the investigator.
Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Significant Abnormalities in 12-Lead Electrocardiograms (ECGs)
Time Frame: Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)
12-lead ECG were recorded after the participants have rested for at least 15 minutes in supine position. Clinically significance was decided by the investigator. The number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in 12-lead ECG were reported.
Baseline up to safety follow-up (96 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 31, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 7, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

June 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 25, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Per company policy, following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the EU and the US, EMD Serono will share study protocols, anonymized patient level and study level data and redacted clinical study reports from clinical trials in patients with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on IgA Nephropathy

Clinical Trials on Placebo

3
Subscribe