Comparison of a Rivaroxaban-based Strategy With an Antiplatelet-based Strategy Following Successful TAVR for the Prevention of Leaflet Thickening and Reduced Leaflet Motion as Evaluated by Four-dimensional, Volume-rendered Computed Tomography (4DCT) (GALILEO-4D)

January 9, 2020 updated by: ECRI bv

Randomized Comparison of a Rivaroxaban-based Strategy With an Antiplatelet-based Strategy Following Successful TAVR for the Prevention of Leaflet Thickening and Reduced Leaflet Motion as Evaluated by Four-dimensional, Volume-rendered Computed Tomography (4DCT) - Substudy of the GALILEO-trial

The aortic valve is located between the left ventricle and the aorta. Patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis conventionally have it surgically replaced requiring direct access to the heart through the chest. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now a well-established alternative for treating severe aortic valve stenosis. Both types of intervention improve prognosis and alleviate symptoms.

The optimal choice of blood thinning therapy after TAVR is unknown. It has been reported that leaflet thrombosis with reduced leaflet motion can occur and this phenomenon has been suggested to be potentially related with neurological events. In addition, the occurence of this phenomenon can be reduced with anticoagulation blood thinning therapy.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if anticoagulation compared to the usual double platelet inhibitor therapy after TAVR can reduce the risk of leaflet thrombosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an established therapeutic option for patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis, who are ineligible or at high risk for conventional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). It was recently reported that leaflet thickening and reduced leaflet motion, verified by four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT), was not uncommon after both TAVR and SAVR. It has been emphasized that this phenomenon should be further investigated for its effect on clinical outcomes (e.g. stroke) and valve durability. As this valve leaflet thickening and reduced motion could be reversed by oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment and was not observed in patients on chronic OAC therapy, it has been hypothesized that this phenomenon could be related to possible leaflet thrombosis or a "thrombotic film" on the leaflets.

AIM: To evaluate whether a rivaroxaban-based strategy, following successful TAVR, compared to an antiplatelet-based strategy, is superior in reducing subclinical valve leaflet thickening and motion abnormalities - as detected by 4DCT-scan.

POPULATION: All patients undergoing successful TAVR by ileofemoral or subclavian access with an approved TAVR device will be screened for eligibility. Included subjects must provide written informed consent. Inclusion and exclusion criteria are listed below.

DESIGN: The GALILEO-4D trial will be conducted as a substudy of the multicenter, open-label, randomized, event-driven, active-controlled GALILEO trial. Patients will be 1:1 randomized to an antiplatelet-based strategy vs. rivaroxaban-based strategy - the randomization will adopt the same 1:1 randomization of the main GALILEO trial. In case the GALILEO-4D trial should still be continued after completion of the main GALILEO trial, this 1:1 randomization will be continued until inclusion of 150 patients in both treatment groups. In total, 300 patients will be randomized in the GALILEO-4D trial.

INTERVENTION: Subjects in the GALILEO-4D substudy will receive the same intervention as in the main GALILEO study. In addition, a 4DCT-scan and echocardiography will be performed at 90 days after randomization.

END POINTS: The primary endpoint constitutes the rate of patients with at least one prosthetic leaflet with > 50% motion reduction as assessed by cardiac 4DCT-scan (total N = 300). The secondary endpoints are listed below.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

231

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Edmonton, Canada, AB T6G 2B7
        • University of Alberta Hospital
      • Vancouver, Canada, ON M1L 1W1
        • Providence Health Care
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8000
        • Aarhus University Hospital
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Odense University Hospital
      • Bad Nauheim, Germany, 61231
        • Kerckhoff Klinik GmbH
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin - Campus Mitte
      • Dortmund, Germany, 44137
        • St. Johannes Hospital
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91012
        • Universitätsklinikum Erlangen
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein
      • Lahr, Germany, 77933
        • Medicin Herzzentrum Lahr/Baden
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04289
        • Herzzentrum Leipzig - Universitätsklinik
      • München, Germany, 80636
        • Deutsches Herzzentrum München
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105
        • Academic Medical Center
      • Breda, Netherlands, 4818
        • Amphia Zienkenhuis
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015
        • Erasmus M.C
      • Lund, Sweden, SE-205 02
        • Skåne University Hospital
      • Stockholm, Sweden, SE-171 76
        • Karolinska University Hospital
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4056
        • University Hospital Basel
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Cedars Sinai Medical Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029-6574
        • Mount Sinai M.C
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
        • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 78229
        • University of Texas, Health Science Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Successful TAVR of a native aortic valve stenosis
  • By iliofemoral or subclavian access
  • With any approved/marketed TAVR device
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF), current or previous, with an ongoing indication for oral anticoagulant treatment
  • Any other indication for continued treatment with any oral anticoagulant
  • Known bleeding diathesis (such as but not limited to platelet count ≤ 50,000/mm3 at screening, hemoglobin level < 8.5 g/dL or < 5.3 mmol/l, history of intracranial hemorrhage, or subdural hematoma)
  • Any indication for dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for more than three months after randomization (such as coronary, carotid, or peripheral stent implantation)
  • Clinically overt stroke within the last three months
  • Planned coronary or vascular intervention or major surgery
  • Severe renal insufficiency (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or on dialysis, or post-TAVR unresolved acute kidney injury with renal dysfunction ≥ stage 2
  • Moderate and severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class B or C) or any hepatic disease associated with coagulopathy
  • Iodine contrast allergy or other condition that prohibits CT imaging

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ASA + Clopidogrel
ASA (Acetylsalicylic acid) 75-100mg + Clopidogrel 75mg for 90 days, followed by ASA 75-100mg monotherapy

Drug: Acetylsalicylic acid:

75 - 100 mg OD (for first 90 days only in arm 1)

Other Names:
  • Asprin
Drug: Clopidogrel 75 mg OD for first 90 days
Other Names:
  • Plavix
Experimental: Rivaroxaban + ASA
Rivaroxaban 10mg + ASA 75-100mg for 90 days, followed by rivaroxaban 10mg monotherapy

Drug: Acetylsalicylic acid:

75 - 100 mg OD (for first 90 days only in arm 1)

Other Names:
  • Asprin

Drug: Rivaroxaban (Xarelto):

10 mg OD (once-daily)

Other Names:
  • Xarelto

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Patients With at Least One Prosthetic Leaflet With >50% Motion Reduction as Assessed by Cardiac 4DCT-scan
Time Frame: 3 months
Reduced systolic leaflet excursion is classified as: (I) normal, (II) mildly reduced (<50%), (III) moderate to severely reduced (>50%), and (IV) immobile. Reduced systolic leaflet excursion is considered significant when it is > 50% or immobile. Quantitative assessment of leaflet motion is performed with a blood pool inversion volume rendered cine reconstruction throughout the cardiac cycle evaluating the bioprosthetic leaflets.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Rate of Prosthetic Leaflets With > 50% Motion Reduction as Assessed by Cardiac 4DCT-scan
Time Frame: 3 months
The rate of prosthetic leaflets with RLM> grade 3 as assessed by cardiac 4DCT
3 months
The Rate of Patients With at Least One Prosthetic Leaflet With Thickening as Assessed by Cardiac 4DCT-scan
Time Frame: 3 months
The rate of patients with at least one prosthetic leaflet with hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) as assessed by cardiac 4DCT.
3 months
The Rate of Prosthetic Leaflets With Thickening as Assessed by Cardiac 4DCT-scan
Time Frame: 3 months
The rate of prosthetic leaflet with HALT as assessed by cardiac 4DCT-scan
3 months
Aortic Transvalvular Mean Pressure Gradient (mmHg) as Determined by Transthoracic Echocardiography.
Time Frame: 3 months

Transprosthetic mean pressure gradiënt as determined by transthoracic echocardiography at three months after randomization.

scale [0-100]

3 months
Effective Orifice Area (cm^2) as Determined by Transthoracic Echocardiography.
Time Frame: 3 months

Effective orifice area (cm2) as determined by transthoracic echocardiography at three months after randomization.

scale [0.1-4.0]

3 months
Death Assessed in the Main GALILEO Study and Analyzed in the GALILEO-4D Substudy With Regards to Occurence of the Leaflet Abnormalities (HALT) - as Exploratory Analysis.
Time Frame: 3 months
Death, Dichotomization by HALT
3 months
Death Assessed in the Main GALILEO Study and Analyzed in the GALILEO-4D Substudy With Regards to Occurence of the Leaflet Abnormalities (RLM)- as Exploratory Analysis.
Time Frame: 3 months
Death, Dichotomization by RLM
3 months
Thromboembolic Event Assessed in the Main GALILEO Study and Analyzed in the GALILEO-4D Substudy With Regards to Occurence of the Leaflet Abnormalities (HALT)- as Exploratory Analysis.
Time Frame: 3 months
Thromboembolic event, Dichotomization by HALT
3 months
Thromboembolic Event Assessed in the Main GALILEO Study and Analyzed in the GALILEO-4D Substudy With Regards to Occurence of the Leaflet Abnormalities (RLM) - as Exploratory Analysis.
Time Frame: 3 months
Thromboembolic event, Dichotomization by RLM
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lars Søndergaard, MD;DMSc, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 12, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

July 14, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2020

Last Verified

January 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Acetylsalicylic acid

3
Subscribe