Experience Sampling Method for Symptom Assessment in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

May 18, 2022 updated by: Maastricht University Medical Center

Development and Validation of a Real-time Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Chronic Abdominal Pain: The Experience Sampling Method (ESM)

Reliable patient reported outcome measures (PROM's) for symptom assessment in irritable bowel syndrome are essential in order to investigate natural disease course and potential treatment options aimed at symptom improvement, since biological markers are currently unavailable. Currently used symptom assessment methods, i.e. end-of-day or end-of-week questionnaires, have considerable limitations. The Experience Sampling Method (ESM), an electronic questioning method characterized by random and repeated, momentary assessments in the subject's current state and environment, might overcome these limitations. Aim of this study is to validate an IBS-specific electronic patient-reported outcome measure, based on the Experience Sampling Method-principle, for symptom assessment in IBS.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

184

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Maastricht, Netherlands, 6229ER
        • Maastricht University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

IBS patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of irritable bowel syndrome according to Rome IV criteria.
  • Ability to understand and speak the national language of the concerning center.
  • Ability to understand how to utilize the ESM-tool.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any organic explanation for the abdominal complaints.
  • A history of abdominal surgery, except for uncomplicated appendectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hysterectomy.
  • Start up of regularly used medication from one month before inclusion until the end of study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
IBS patients
IBS according to Rome IV criteria.
Healthy control group
Healthy volunteers without abdominal complaints fulfilling Rome IV criteria for IBS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal pain scores as measured by the ESM tool.
Time Frame: 7 days
Momentary measurements.
7 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Abdominal pain scores as measured by the end-of-day diary.
Time Frame: 7 days
Retrospective measurements with a recall period of one day.
7 days
Abdominal pain scores as measured by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale - IBS.
Time Frame: 7 days
Retrospective measurements with a recall period of one week.
7 days
Symptom scores (other than abdominal pain) as measured using the ESM-tool.
Time Frame: 7 days
Gastrointestinal symptoms, psychological symptoms, extra-intestinal symptoms, data on context and environment.
7 days
Gastrointestinal symptom scores (other than abdominal pain) as measured using the end-of-day diary.
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Gastrointestinal symptom scores (other than abdominal pain) as measured using the GSRS-IBS.
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Psychological symptom scores as measured using the PHQ-9.
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Psychological symptom scores as measured using the GAD-7.
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days
Quality of life scores as measured using SF-36.
Time Frame: 7 days
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ad A.M. Masclee, MD, PhD, Maastricht University Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

August 26, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe