Serious Adverse Drug Reaction and Their Preventability (SADR)

September 2, 2016 updated by: CHU de Reims

Serious Adverse Drug Reaction and Their Preventability in the Elderly Over 65 Years

Introduction: Elderly aged over 65 years accounted for around 17.5% of the French general population. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are common in this population. In elderly subject, prevalence of ADRs ranged from 4.3% to 63.0%.

Aim: To describe the serious ADR in elderly subjects aged over 65 years and assess their preventability.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne (northeast of France) between January and May 2013. Patients aged over 65 years who presented a serious ADR notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center were included in the study.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Introduction: Elderly aged over 65 years accounted for around 17.5% of the French general population. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) are common in this population. In elderly subject, prevalence of ADRs ranged from 4.3% to 63.0%. Age itself is not a risk factor for ADRs but is a factor of severity of ADR. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), more than half of all ADRs are considered to be preventable in elderly subjects. They are most often the result of a mistake during the prescription phase, or the monitoring phase, or may be due to poor compliance or inappropriate self-medication. Drug prescription is based on guidelines derived from clinical trial that have not included elderly subject with multiple comorbidities. Data regarding drug safety from clinical trials alone are insufficient, hence the need to continue the monitoring of ADR after drug marketing.

Aim: To describe the serious ADR in elderly subjects aged over 65 years and assess their preventability.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne (northeast of France) between January and May 2013. Patients aged over 65 years who presented a serious ADR notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center were included in the study.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Reims, France, 51092
        • CHU de Reims

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who presented an adverse drug reaction notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged over 65 years
  • Patients who presented a serious adverse drug reaction notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Adverse drug reaction
Patients aged over 65 years who presented a serious adverse drug reaction notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne between January and May 2013 were included in the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The different type of serious ADR were coded according to Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA version 16.0) according to lowest-level terms (LLTs), and then grouped by system organ class (SOC).
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Drugs involved in the occurrence of serious ADR
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Evolution were classified as "recovered", "not yet recovered", "recovered with sequelae" , "death" , "unknown"
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months
Preventability was assessed by using the preventability French scale.
Time Frame: 9 months
9 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 19, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 5, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 5, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Adverse Drug Reaction

Clinical Trials on Adverse drug reaction

3
Subscribe