Standard Precautions Versus Contact Additional Precautions Against Multi-drug Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Unit (PSBMR) (PSBMR)

Are Standard Precautions as Efficient as Contact Additional Precautions Against the Transmission of Multi-drug Resistant Bacteria in Intensive Care Unit ?

The national recommendations promote the applying of the Contact Additional Precautions (CAP) with the Standard Precautions (SP) to limit the transmission of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, that could entail more costs and a reduction of quality of the patient care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The national recommendations promote the applying of the Contact Additional Precautions (CAP) with the Standard Precautions (SP) to limit the transmission of multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, that could entail more costs and a reduction of quality of the patient care.

This study seeks showing it in way of a non-interventional research in a resuscitation unit. Two periods are compared for noticing the rates of MDR bacteria contaminations.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3124

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Metz Cedex 03, France, 57085
        • CHR Metz-Thionville

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients hospitalized in the resuscitation unit of the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • hospitalization in resuscitation unit

Exclusion Criteria:

  • opposition for gathering data

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of Meticillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) and Enterobacteriaceae producing Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (EESBL) per 1000 hospitalization days
Time Frame: 1000 days
1000 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jocelyne SELLIES, MD, CHR Metz-Thionville

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 7, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 7, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2016

Last Verified

August 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-06Obs-CHRMT

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multi-drug Resistant Bacteria

3
Subscribe