PACCT: Partnering Around Cancer Clinical Trials

December 20, 2022 updated by: Susan Eggly
This research has the overall goal of increasing rates at which African American and White men with prostate cancer make an informed decision to participate in a cancer clinical trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This research utilizes two distinct research designs to evaluate two separate behavioral interventions.

The first is a between-subject randomized controlled trial to evaluate a patient-focused intervention. The intervention consists of a booklet designed to encourage patients to view themselves as part of the patient-physician team and to participate actively in clinical interactions by asking questions and stating concerns.

The second is a within-subject interrupted time series design to evaluate a physician-focused intervention. The intervention is an educational module and email reminders designed to encourage physicians to discuss trials with all eligible patients using patient-centered communication.In the patient-focused intervention, patients are randomized to an intervention or usual care group, and comparison of outcomes is made between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

316

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins University/Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Karmanos Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Physician participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • Treat patients with prostate cancer
  • Able to recruit patients to clinical trials

Exclusion criteria:

  • Do not treat patients with prostate cancer
  • Not able to recruit patients to clinical trials

Patient Participants

Inclusion criteria:

  • Black, African American or White; Non-hispanic confirmed diagnosis of prostate Cancer
  • Seeing a participating physician for less than a year and expect to see this physician at least once in the coming year
  • Able to read and write English well enough to understand and sign consent forms and respond to questionnaires

Exclusion criteria:

  • Not black, African American or White; non Hispanic
  • No confirmed diagnosis of prostate cancer
  • Not seeing a participating physician or seeing a participating physician for > than one year
  • Not able to read and write English well enough to understand and sign consent forms and respond to questionnaires

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients--Intervention
Patients are randomized to an intervention group. They participate in all aspects of the study and also receive the intervention, which consists of a booklet.
This booklet encourages patients to view themselves as members of the patient-doctor team and to participate actively during clinical interactions by asking questions and stating concerns.
No Intervention: Patients--Usual Care
Patients are randomized to the standard of care arm and participate in all aspects of the study but receive no intervention.
Other: Physicians
Physicians receive the intervention approximately halfway through data collection for a within subjects, pre-post intervention comparison
Physicians will participate in an educational module and receive email prompts to encourage them to discuss trials with all patients who are eligible for a clinical trial, using patient-centered communication

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician Offers of a Clinical Trial
Time Frame: Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment
Single item: Did the physician offer a trial?
Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Decisions to Enroll in a Trial
Time Frame: 1 week following clinical interaction
Single item: Did you agree to participate in this trial?
1 week following clinical interaction
Patient Active Participation
Time Frame: Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment
Observers' global assessment of patients' participation in the interaction
Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment
Quality of Informed Consent (Modified)
Time Frame: 1 week following clinical interaction
12-item patient-self report on Quality of Informed Consent (QUIC)
1 week following clinical interaction
Patient Enrollment in Trial
Time Frame: 3 months following clinical interaction
medical chart abstraction
3 months following clinical interaction
Physician Patient-Centered Communication
Time Frame: Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment
Observers' rating of physician communication
Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment
Quality of Trial-Related Communication
Time Frame: Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment
Observers' assessment of physician communication related to clinical trials
Day of clinical interaction; up to 2 years following enrollment
Physician Patient-Centeredness
Time Frame: Immediately following clinical interaction
14-item patient self-report scale
Immediately following clinical interaction

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Susan Eggly, Ph.D., Wayne State University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 17, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 20, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prostate Cancer

Clinical Trials on Patients: Questions to Ask Your Doctor: A Workbook for Patient-Doctor Teams

Subscribe