Specific Neck Rehabilitation for Unilateral Headache and Neck Pain, and Structural and Functional Changes in the Brain

May 10, 2023 updated by: University of Tromso

Effects of Specific Neck Rehabilitation on Patients With Unilateral Headache and Neck Pain (Cervicogenic Headache), and Relation to Structural and Functional Changes in the Brain

In part 1 of the project clinical effect of specific neck rehabilitation for unilateral headache and neck pain (also termed cervicogenic headache) will be compared with standard primary health care. The researchers will further study whether fear avoidance beliefs and self-efficacy predict long term neck function and headache frequency superior to active range of neck movement. Part 2 will investigate whether patients with cervicogenic headache have structural changes in cerebral grey and white matter and in connectivity of the resting state state network, and whether these are reversed after effective neck rehabilitation and correlate to symptom severity and degree of disability.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The project includes two parts:

Part 1: With a longitudinal semicross-over, randomized control design the investigators will compare the clinical efficacy of a 6 month specific neck rehabilitation with standard primary health care on patients with unilateral headache and neck pain ( also termed cervicogenic headache) and study whether self-efficacy and fear avoidance beliefs predict 12 month self-reported neck function and headache frequency superior to the active range of neck movement The patients will either receive a specific neck rehabilitation program or 6 month standard primary health care before they cross over to neck rehabilitation. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics will be collected before each treatment session and 6 and 12 months later.

Part 2: With a non-randomized comparative design including a subsample of the patients (n: 36) and healthy controls (n: 36) the investigators will explore whether there are structural changes in the cerebral grey and white matter, and whether cerebral connectivity within the default mode network (DMN and other major cerebral networks) are significantly different and whether the changes correlate to symptom severity and degree of disability.

Structural (cortical volume and thickness) changes will measured by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRi) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), while cerebral connectivity by resting state fMRI (rs-fMRI). Whether the anticipated cerebral changes in volume, structure and connectivity are reversed after specific neck rehabilitation will be tested by repeated measurements. Analyses of MRI scans and clinical characteristics will be performed before each treatment session and 6 months later.

Statistics: Power calculations based on previous studies indicate that for the clinical part a number of 21 patients within each treatment group (a total of 42 patients) and for the MR analyses a subsample of 34 patients and 34 health controls will be sufficient to obtain a statistical power of 80% with a p-value of 5%. Due to a high drop out rate we have included a total of 57 patients. Changes between baseline and the 6 month follow up will be used for "between and within group" comparisons while 12 months data will be included for in "within-group" comparisons. Statistical predictor analyses will be performed by regression analyses. The statistician who are performing the primary end point analysis, are blinded to group assignment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

57

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tromso, Norway, 9019
        • University Hospital of North Norway

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral headache and neck pain for 2 years or more
  • Minimum one headache attack pr week (numeric rating scale ≥4)
  • Five or more of Antonaci's seven diagnostic criteria
  • Neck Disability Index score ≥8 Points (≥16 percent points).

For healthy controls:

• Same age distribution

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Progressive diseases (rheumatoid arthritis, cancer)
  • Ongoing cervical infection
  • Neurological disease (syringomyelia, radiculopathy, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, ischemic stroke )
  • Other headache (>1 tension type headache or migraine attack every month)
  • Other pain conditions (including primary temporomandibular disorder and generalized pain (fibromyalgia with pain intensity >6 to digital palpation)
  • Previous or ongoing drug abuse
  • Serious psychiatric disorder.
  • Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 score for depressive symptoms > 2.2
  • Ongoing litigation process
  • Intolerance to MRI
  • Pregnancy and lactation
  • For the subsample undergoing MR analyses: Other systemic diseases (Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, heart disease, cerebrovascular, epilepsy or other vascular diseases) and dysmenorrhea requiring analgesics

For healthy controls:

  • Exclusion criteria as above
  • Chronic pain
  • Chronic dizziness
  • Intolerance to MRI
  • Pregnancy and lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Specific neck rehabilitation
The intervention includes specific neck rehabilitation as described by Jull and Falla over a period of 4 weeks and recommendations for further training.
Guided craniocervical, axioscapular and proprioceptive training that includes education, postural exercises, as well as training of cervical and shoulder muscles, and vestibular rehabilitation, included oculomotor function if indicated, and general exercises
Active Comparator: Standard primary health care
This represents individualized therapy administered by the primary physician.
The treatment may include pharmacological medication, chiropractic and physiotherapy or no active treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference of days with headache pr week after specific neck rehabilitation vs standard primary health care
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline
Between group comparison with a numeric variable (scale 0-7)
6 months after baseline
Differences in grey matter volume of the brain and brain stem between patients with unilateral headache and neck pain vs. healthy controls
Time Frame: Baseline
Two independent group comparison based on volumetric analysis of cerebral grey matter also including surface based measurements (continuous variable)
Baseline
Differences in cortical thickness between patients with unilateral headache and neck pain vs. healthy controls
Time Frame: Baseline
Two independent group comparison based on surface based analyses of cerebral grey matter carried out with FreeSurfer version 6.0
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference in pain intensity after specific neck rehabilitation vs. standard primary health care
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline
Between group comparison with a numeric variable (scale 0-10)
6 months after baseline
Improved neck function after specific neck rehabilitation vs. standard primary health care
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline
Between group comparison with a numeric variable (scale 0-50)
6 months after baseline
Change in grey matter volume of the brain and brain stem in patients with unilateral headache and neck pain after specific neck rehabilitation
Time Frame: 6 months
Within group comparison based on volumetric analysis of cerebral grey matter also including surface based measurements (continuous variable)
6 months
Change in cortical thickness of the brain between patients with unilateral headache and neck pain after specific neck rehabilitation
Time Frame: 6 months
Within group comparison based on surface based volumetric analysis of cerebral grey matter (continous variable)
6 months
Differences in white matter integrity in patients with unilateral headache and neck pain vs. healthy controls
Time Frame: Baseline
Two independent group comparison based on diffusion tensor imaging with tract based spatial statistics analyses
Baseline
Difference in white matter integrity after specific neck rehabilitation vs standard primary health care
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline
Between group comparison based on diffusion tensor imaging with tract based spatial statistics analyses
6 months after baseline
How four week baseline headache intensity reported by a numeric rating scale is associated with regional grey matter volumes measured by surface based volumetry in patients with unilateral headache and neck pain.
Time Frame: Baseline
Linear regression analysis will be performed where the surface based volumetric measure of cerebral grey matter is the dependent variable, and four week baseline headache intensity is independent variable. Baseline headache intensity is based on daily measures during the last 4 weeks and is reported by an electronic diary and numeric rating scale where 0 is no pain and 10 is worst imaginable pain. It is thus considered a continuous measure. Age and gender are included as covariates.
Baseline
How baseline perceived cognitive function predicts volumetric differences of cerebral grey matter in patients with unilateral headache and neck pain
Time Frame: Baseline
Linear regression analysis of surface based volumetric measures of grey matter (continuous data) and scores of Everyday Memory Questionnaire (scale 0-8).
Baseline
How baseline active range of neck movement predicts neck function
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
A logistic regression analysis on how baseline active range of neck movement (continuous data, degrees of rotation) predicts a 30% reduction in Neck Disability Index Score (0-50). Co-factors are age, gender, education, sick-leave.
12 months after baseline
How baseline active range of neck movement predicts headache frequency
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
A logistic regression analysis on how baseline active range of neck movement (continuous data, degrees of rotation) predicts a 30% reduction in headache frequency (0-7). Co-factors are age, gender, education, sick-leave.
12 months after baseline
How baseline self efficacy predicts neck function
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
A logistic regression analysis on how baseline General self efficacy scale score (scale 10-40) predicts a 30% reduction in Neck Disability Index Score (0-50). Co-factors are age, gender, education, sick-leave.
12 months after baseline
How baseline self efficacy predicts headache frequency
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
A logistic regression analysis on how baseline General self efficacy scale score (scale 10-40) predicts a 30% reduction in headache frequency (0-7). Co-factors are age, gender, education, sick-leave.
12 months after baseline
How baseline fear avoidance beliefs for physical activity predict neck function
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
A logistic regression analysis on how baseline fear avoidance beliefs score predict a 30% reduction in Neck Disability Index Score (0-50). Co-factors are age, gender, education, sick-leave.
12 months after baseline
How baseline fear avoidance beliefs for physical activity predict headache frequency
Time Frame: 12 months after baseline
A logistic regression analysis on how baseline fear avoidance beliefs for physical activity score predict a 30% reduction in headache frequency (0-7). Co-factors are age, gender, education, sick-leave.
12 months after baseline
Difference in intra-network connectivity of resting state networks in patients with unilateral headache and neck pain vs. healthy controls.
Time Frame: Baseline
Two independent comparison based on baseline rs-fMRI data to compare patients and controls. In multivariate general linear models, the investigators will use DMN and other major cerebral networks, identified by independent component analysis (ICA), as dependent variables and test whether there are differences in cerebral connectivity between patients and controls. All rs-fMRI analyses will be performed with the GIFT software http://mialab.mrn.org/software/gift/index.html. An ICA procedure in GIFT will be used to identify functional networks. GIFT that has a MatLab based statistical module for general linear modelling (GLM) of rs-fMRI data that will be used for all rs-fMRI analyses.
Baseline
Change of resting state connectivity in patients who report reduction in headache attacks.
Time Frame: 6 months after baseline
Within group comparison of resting state networks between baseline and 6 months follow up in a repeated measure GLM in the GIFT. Connectivity of DMN and other major networks is dependent variable and change in number of headache attacks main predictor variable.
6 months after baseline
Changes of resting state connectivity related to pain relief after specific neck rehabilitation.
Time Frame: 6 months
Within group comparison of resting state networks between baseline and 6 months follow up in a multivariate GLM. Change of connectiviy in DMN and other major networks is dependent variables and pain reports main covariate.
6 months
Changes in connectivity of resting state networks related to improved craniocervical flexion endurance capacity after specific neck rehabilitation.
Time Frame: 6 months
Within group comparison of resting state networks between baseline and 6 months follow in a multivariate GLM. Connectivity of DMN and other major networks is dependent variables and craniocervical flexion endurance capacity main covariate.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gunnvald Kvarstein, PhD, UiT The Arctic University of Tromsø

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 14, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

September 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervicogenic Headache

Clinical Trials on Specific neck rehabilitation

3
Subscribe