Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System Study for PAD (Disrupt PAD III)

December 19, 2023 updated by: Shockwave Medical, Inc.

Randomized Study of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty® System Used in Combination With DCB Versus Standard Balloon Angioplasty Used in Combination With DCB to Treat Moderate and Severely Calcified Femoropopliteal Arteries

Shockwave Medical Inc. intends to conduct a prospective, multi-center, single blind, randomized (1:1) study of Lithoplasty treatment used in combination with DCB versus standard balloon angioplasty used in combination with DCB to treat moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal arteries. Assuming that roughly 15% of the subjects will be lost-to-follow-up, a total of up to 400 subjects (200 per treatment arm) will be enrolled in the study at up to 60 sites in Europe, the United States and New Zealand.

In addition to the randomized study, an observational study of subjects who do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the randomized study will be conducted. The objective of the observational study is to assess the real-world acute performance of the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System in the treatment of calcified, stenotic, peripheral arteries.

The observational study is a prospective, multi-center, single arm observational study for subjects who do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the randomized study.

A maximum of 1500 subjects at the same 60 sites will be enrolled in the observational study. Once enrollment in the randomized portion of the study is complete, subjects may continue to be enrolled in the observational study provided they meet OS eligibility criteria.

Results for the observational study will be reported in a separate record under NCT05881421.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Shockwave Medical Inc. intends to conduct a prospective, multi-center, single blind, randomized (1:1) study of Lithoplasty treatment used in combination with DCB versus standard balloon angioplasty used in combination with DCB to treat moderate and severely calcified femoropopliteal arteries. The Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty System is indicated for lithotripsy-enhanced, low-pressure balloon dilatation of calcified, stenotic peripheral arteries in patients who are candidates for percutaneous therapy. Up to 400 subjects at 60 sites in Europe, the United States and New Zealand.

Subjects will be followed through discharge, 30 days, and 6, 12 and 24 months. DUS assessments will be completed at 12 and 24 months. Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting by angiographic core lab.

Subjects who do not meet the randomized study inclusion and exclusion criteria, but meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria for the observational study may be enrolled in the observational study. The objective of the observational study is to assess the real-world acute performance of the Shockwave Medical Lithoplasty System in the treatment of calcified, stenotic, peripheral arteries.The observational study is a prospective, multi-center, single arm observational study for subjects who do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the randomized study. A maximum of 1500 subjects at the same 60 sites will be enrolled in the observational study. Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting by angiographic core lab. Enrollment in the observational study is anticipated to last approximately 22 months. Subjects in the observational study will be followed through hospital discharge. Once enrollment in the randomized portion of the study is complete, subjects may continue to be enrolled in the observational study provided they meet OS eligibility criteria. Results for the observational study will be reported in a separate record under NCT05881421.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

306

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8036
        • Medizinische Universitaet Graz
      • Vienna, Austria, 1140
        • Gefäßsambulanz
      • Arnsberg, Germany, 59759
        • Karolinen-Hospital
      • Bad Krozingen, Germany, 79189
        • Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg & Bad Krozingen
      • Berlin, Germany, 10713
        • Sankt Gertrauden-Krankenhaus
      • Bonn, Germany, 53127
        • Leiter Sektion Angiologie
      • Bruchsal, Germany, 76646
        • Medizinische Klinik II
      • Hamburg, Germany, 21075
        • Klinik für Gefäßmedizin
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04103
        • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AoR Leipzig
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Katholisches Klinikum Mainz
      • Munster, Germany, 48145
        • St. Franziskus Hospital
      • Mülheim, Germany, 45468
        • Evangelisches Krankenhaus Mühlheim an der Ruhr
      • Rosenheim, Germany, 83022
        • RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim
      • Auckland, New Zealand, 1023
        • Auckland City Hospital
    • Arkansas
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72211
        • Arkansas Heart Hospital
    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford hospital
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Rocky Mountain Regional VA Medical Center
      • Loveland, Colorado, United States, 80538
        • UCHealth Northern Colorado
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale New Haven Hospital
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • MedStar Cardiovascular Research Network @ Medstar Washington Hospital Center
    • Florida
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
        • Tallahassee Research Institute, Inc.
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
        • Piedmont Heart Institute
      • Gainesville, Georgia, United States, 30501
        • Northeast Georgia Medical Center
    • Illinois
      • Elk Grove Village, Illinois, United States, 60007
        • Alexian Brothers Medical Center
      • Naperville, Illinois, United States, 60540
        • Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation
      • Springfield, Illinois, United States, 62769
        • Prairie Education & Research Cooperative
    • Iowa
      • Davenport, Iowa, United States, 52803
        • Midwest Cardiovascular Research Foundation
    • Maine
      • Brighton, Maine, United States, 02135
        • Steward St. Elizabeth's Medical Center
    • Michigan
      • Pontiac, Michigan, United States, 48431
        • St. Joseph Mercy Oakland
      • Southfield, Michigan, United States, 48075
        • Ascension / St. John Providence
    • Mississippi
      • Tupelo, Mississippi, United States, 38801
        • North Mississippi Medical Center
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
        • Saint Luke's Cardiovascular Consultants
      • Lee's Summit, Missouri, United States, 64086
        • St. Luke's East Hospital
    • New Jersey
      • Browns Mills, New Jersey, United States, 08015
        • Deborah Heart and Lung Center
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
      • New York, New York, United States, 10019
        • Mount Sinai West
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital
    • North Carolina
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27610
        • WakeMed Health & Hospitals
      • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States, 27607
        • NC Heart & Vascular Research
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
        • Ohio Health Research Institute
    • Oklahoma
      • Bartlesville, Oklahoma, United States, 74006
        • St. John Clinic
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97213
        • Providence Portland Medical Center
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97225
        • Providence Heart & Vascular Institute
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States, 19010
        • Bryn Mawr Hospital
      • Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 17101
        • PinnacleHealth Harrisburg Hospital
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19141
        • Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia
      • Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States, 19096
        • Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
        • The Miriam Hospital
    • Tennessee
      • Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
        • Wellmont CVA Heart Institute
      • Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37934
        • Tennova Healthcare - Turkey Creek Medical Center
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38120
        • Baptist Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
        • St. David's Heart and Vascular dba Austin Heart
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine
    • West Virginia
      • Charleston, West Virginia, United States, 25304
        • Charleston Area Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Randomized Study Arm Eligibility Criteria

General Inclusion Criteria

  1. Subject is able and willing to comply with all assessments in the study.
  2. Subject or subject's legal representative have been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate and has signed the approved consent form.
  3. Age of subject is greater than or equal to 18.
  4. Rutherford Clinical Category 2, 3, or 4 of the target limb.
  5. Estimated life expectancy >1 year.
  6. Subject is a suitable candidate for angiography and endovascular intervention in the opinion of the investigator or per hospital guideline.
  7. Subject is intended to undergo treatment with Lithoplasty followed by DCB, or DCB with standard balloon pre-dilatation.

    Angiographic Inclusion Criteria

  8. Target lesion that is located in a native, de novo superficial femoral artery (SFA) or popliteal artery (popliteal artery extends to and ends proximal to the ostium of the anterior tibial artery).
  9. Target lesion reference vessel diameter is between 4.0mm and 7.0mm by visual estimate.
  10. Target lesion is ≥70% stenosis by investigator via visual estimate.
  11. Target lesion length is ≤180mm for lesions 70-99% stenosed. Target lesion can be all or part of the 180mm treated zone.
  12. Chronic total occlusion, lesion length is ≤100mm of the total ≤180 mm target lesion.
  13. Subject has at least one patent tibial vessel on the target leg with runoff to the foot, defined as no stenosis >50%.
  14. Calcification is at least moderate defined as presence of fluoroscopic evidence of calcification: 1) on parallel sides of the vessel and 2) extending > 50% the length of the lesion if lesion is ≥50mm in length; or extending for minimum of 20mm if lesion is <50mm in length.

General Exclusion Criteria

  1. Rutherford Clinical Category 0, 1, 5 and 6.
  2. Subject has active infection requiring antibiotic therapy.
  3. Planned target limb major amputation (above the ankle).
  4. History of prior endovascular or surgical procedure on the index limb within the past 30 days or planned within 30 days of the index procedure.
  5. Subject has a known coagulopathy or has bleeding diatheses, thrombocytopenia with platelet count less than 100,000/microliter.
  6. Subject in whom antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is contraindicated.
  7. Subject has known allergy to contrast agents or medications used to perform endovascular intervention that cannot be adequately pre-treated.
  8. Subject has known allergy to urethane, nylon, or silicone.
  9. Myocardial infarction within 60 days prior to enrollment.
  10. History of stroke within 60 days prior to enrollment.
  11. History of thrombolytic therapy within two weeks of enrollment.
  12. Subject has acute or chronic renal disease defined as serum creatinine of >2.5 mg/dL or >220 umol/L, or on dialysis.
  13. Subject is pregnant or nursing.
  14. Subject is participating in another research study involving an investigational agent (pharmaceutical, biologic, or medical device) that has not reached the primary endpoint.
  15. Subject has other medical, social or psychological problems that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving this treatment, and the procedures and evaluations pre- and post-treatment.
  16. The use of specialty balloons, re-entry or atherectomy devices.

    Angiographic Exclusion Criteria

  17. In-stent restenosis within 10mm of the target zone.
  18. Lesions within 10mm of the ostium of the SFA or within 10mm of the ostium of the anterior tibial artery.
  19. Evidence of aneurysm or thrombus in target vessel.
  20. No calcium or mild calcium in the target lesion.
  21. Target lesion within native or synthetic vessel grafts.
  22. Subject has significant stenosis (>50% stenosis) or occlusion of inflow tract before target treatment zone (e.g. iliac or common femoral) not successfully treated.
  23. Subject requires treatment of a peripheral lesion on the ipsilateral limb distal to target site at the time of the index procedure.
  24. Failure to successfully cross the guidewire across the target lesion; successful crossing defined as tip of the guidewire distal to the target lesion in the absence of flow limiting dissections or perforations.

Subjects who do not meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria for the randomized study may satisfy the eligibility criteria for the observational study.

Observational Study Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Subjects intended to be treated with the Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty® System for de-novo or restenotic lesions of the femoral, ilio-femoral, popliteal, and infra-popliteal arteries.
  2. Subjects presenting with claudication or CLI by Rutherford Clinical Category 2,3,4,5, or 6 of the target limb.
  3. Age of subject is > 18.
  4. Subject or subject's legal representative have been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to participate, and has signed the approved study consent form.
  5. Calcification is at least moderate, defined as presence of fluoroscopic evidence of calcification: 1) on parallel sides of the vessel and 2) extending > 50% the length of the lesion if lesion is ≥50mm in length; or extending for minimum of 20mm if lesion is <50mm in length.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Subjects with any medical condition that would make him/her an inappropriate candidate for treatment with Shockwave Medical Peripheral Lithoplasty® System as per Instructions for Use (IFU) or investigator's opinion.
  2. Subject is already enrolled in other investigational (interventional) studies that would interfere with study endpoints.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lithoplasty System followed by DCB
Shockwave Lithoplasty® Peripheral Lithoplasty System is a lithotripsy-enhanced, low-pressure balloon dilatation of calcified, stenotic peripheral arteries in patients who are candidates for percutaneous therapy. lithoplasty
The Shockwave Lithoplasty® System is a proprietary lithotripsy-enhanced balloon catheter that is designed to be delivered through the peripheral arterial system of the lower extremities to the site of calcified stenosis. Activating the lithotripsy within the device will generate pulsatile mechanical energy within the target treatment site, disrupt calcium within the lesion and allow subsequent dilation of a peripheral artery stenosis using low balloon pressure. The system consists of a balloon catheter with multiple integrated lithotripsy electrodes, and a generator.
The IN.PACT Admiral DCB is an over-the-wire (OTW) balloon catheter with a drug-coated balloon at the distal tip. The drug component, referred to as the FreePac™ drug coating, consists of the drug paclitaxel and the excipient urea. The device component physically dilates the vessel lumen by PTA, and the drug is intended to reduce the proliferative response that is associated with restenosis.
Other Names:
  • drug coated balloon
Active Comparator: Medtronic IN.PACT (DCB)
Medronic IN.PACT Drug Coated Balloon (DBS) is indicated for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in patients with obstructive disease of peripheral arteries, including patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) and arteriovenous (AV) access to help maintain hemodialysis access in patients with end-stage renal disease.
The IN.PACT Admiral DCB is an over-the-wire (OTW) balloon catheter with a drug-coated balloon at the distal tip. The drug component, referred to as the FreePac™ drug coating, consists of the drug paclitaxel and the excipient urea. The device component physically dilates the vessel lumen by PTA, and the drug is intended to reduce the proliferative response that is associated with restenosis.
Other Names:
  • drug coated balloon

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Procedural Success
Time Frame: Peri-Procedural, approximately 2 hours
Procedural success is defined as residual stenosis ≤30% without flow-limiting dissection (≥ grade D) prior to DCB or stenting by angiographic core lab.
Peri-Procedural, approximately 2 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 30 days
  • Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb
  • Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle)
  • Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization
  • Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting
30 days
Clinical Success ABI
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 30 days as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.
30 days
Clinical Success Quality of Life
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 30 days as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied. It ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status."
30 days
Clinical Success Rutherford Category
Time Frame: 30 days
Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 30 days as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.
30 days
Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 30 days
Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI >20% or >0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion >50% at the target lesion site
30 days
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 6 months
  • Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb
  • Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle)
  • Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization
  • Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting
6 months
Clinical Success Rutherford Category
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 6 months as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.
6 months
Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 6 months
Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI >20% or >0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion >50% at the target lesion site
6 months
Clinical Success ABI
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 6 months as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.
6 months
Clinical Success Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 months
Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 6 months as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied and ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.
6 months
Number of Participants With Primary Patency
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and freedom from restenosis determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram greater than or equal to 50% stenosis.
12 months
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 12 months
  • Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb
  • Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle)
  • Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization
  • Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting
12 months
Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 12 months
Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI >20% or >0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion >50% at the target lesion site
12 months
Clinical Success ABI
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 12 months as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.
12 months
Clinical Success Rutherford Category
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 12 months as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.
12 months
Clinical Success Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 months
Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 12 months as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied and ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.
12 months
Number of Participants With Primary Patency
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as freedom from clinically-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) and freedom from restenosis determined by duplex ultrasound or angiogram greater than or equal to 50% stenosis.
24 months
Number of Participants With Major Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: 24 months
  • Need for emergency surgical revascularization of target limb
  • Unplanned target limb major amputation (above the ankle)
  • Symptomatic thrombus or distal emboli that require surgical, mechanical or pharmacologic means to improve flow and extend hospitalization
  • Perforations that require an intervention, including bail-out stenting
24 months
Number of Participants With Clinically-driven Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Time Frame: 24 months
Any revascularization (endovascular or surgical) within the target femoropopliteal vessel due to symptoms or drop of ABI >20% or >0.15 when compared to the 30-day ABI and associated with an angiographic lesion >50% at the target lesion site
24 months
Clinical Success ABI
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as ankle-brachial index ABI reported at 24 months as change from baseline. The ABI is the ratio of systolic blood pressure measured at the ankle to systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery. Ideally, this ratio should be 1.0, but is often less in a subject with peripheral arterial disease.
24 months
Clinical Success Rutherford Category
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined as Rutherford Category reported at 24 months as change from baseline. Clinical scale identifying three grades of claudication and three grades of critical limb ischemia ranging from rest pain alone to minor and major tissue loss. 0 is asymptomatic and 6 is ulcers/gangrene.
24 months
Clinical Success Quality of Life
Time Frame: 24 months
Defined by Quality of Life assessed by EQ5D questionnaire reported at 24 months as change from baseline. The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 3 levels: no problems, some problems, and extreme problems. The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. The overall summary index (from Shaw et. al.) computed from the 5-dimension sub-scores was applied and ranges from 0.000 to 1.000; higher scores indicate better patient-reported health status.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: William A Gray, MD, Main Line Health
  • Principal Investigator: Gunnar Tepe, MD, RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 22, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 12, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 2, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 28, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 30, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

October 4, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Arterial Disease

Clinical Trials on Shockwave Lithoplasty® Peripheral Lithoplasty System

3
Subscribe