Balloon Lithoplasty for Preparation of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions (BALI)

November 6, 2023 updated by: Niels Thue Olsen, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Balloon Lithoplasty for Preparation of Severely Calcified Coronary Lesions Before Stent Implantation - a Nationwide Randomized Trial (BALI)

Severely calcified coronary stenoses are difficult to treat with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using current techniques and there is little specific evidence on how to best treat these cases. It is hypothesized that balloon lithoplasty is superior to conventional balloons for lesion preparation of severely calcified coronary lesions before stent implantation in terms of procedural failure and 1-year target vessel failure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Severely calcified coronary stenoses are difficult to treat with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using current techniques. Severe calcifications make it difficult to sufficiently prepare lesions before stenting, to advance stents, and to achieve full stent expansion. There is increased risk of vessel dissection and perforation with angioplasty on severely calcified lesions, and long-term outcomes of PCI are adversely affected. Because severely calcified lesions are often excluded from interventional studies, there is little specific evidence on how to best treat these cases. Only a few randomized studies have specifically explored this question, focusing on the use of rotational atherectomy

Recently, the technique of balloon-based lithoplasty was made commercially available. With this technique, calcifications are cracked with the creation of high-frequency pressure oscillations in a special angioplasty balloon. Standard techniques are used to deliver and dilate the balloon. The method was developed for treatment of otherwise non-dilatable lesions, and first reported results have been encouraging. The lithoplasty device used in the current study (Shockwave IVL, Shockwave Medical, CA, USA) has received CE-mark and post-approval safety has recently been confirmed for treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions in patients.

Besides obvious benefits in non-dilatable lesions for which interventional cardiologists have few other options, it is possible this technique could change the way all severely calcified lesions are treated. Balloon lithoplasty could theoretically crack plates of calcium in the vessel wall in an orderly fashion, which could lead to safer and quicker preparation of severely calcified lesions. Furthermore, a better softening of vessel wall calcium could allow full and symmetric expansion of coronary stents, which could lead to better long-term stent patency.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium
        • University Hospital Leuven
      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9100
        • Aalborg University Hospital
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
        • Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet
      • Odense, Denmark, 5000
        • Odense University Hospital
      • Roskilde, Denmark, 4000
        • Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde Sygehus
    • Copenhagen
      • Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2900
        • Gentofte University Hospital
      • Tallinn, Estonia
        • North-Estonia Medical Center
      • Trondheim, Norway
        • Trondheim University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years and < 90 years
  • Stable coronary heart disease or non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
  • PCI planned in severely calcified, non-occluded, de-novo lesion in native vessel. Definition of severe calcifications (minimum 1 of 3 (i-iii)); i. Angiography: Radioopacities of the vessel wall visible on cine images before contrast injection on both sides of the vessel lumen in more than one projection. ii. OCT (before lesion preparation): Maximum calcium 1) angle >180 degrees AND 2) thickness 0.5mm, AND 3) longitudinal length >5m m. iii. IVUS (before lesion preparation): Maximum calcium angle >270 degrees.
  • Functional evidence of ischemia (non-invasive stress test or fractional flow reserve) in the target vessel territory or stenosis ≥ 90% by visual estimate
  • Target vessel reference diameter visually estimated at 2.5-4 mm with ability to pass a 0.014" guidewire across lesion
  • Ability to tolerate dual antiplatelet therapy
  • Informed consent

Angiographic exclusion criteria:

  • Unprotected left main stenosis
  • Chronic total occlusion
  • Severely calcified bifurcated lesion with expected need to use two stent technique
  • Coronary artery dissection

Clinical exclusion criteria

  • ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction
  • Planned later revascularization in non-study lesions
  • Planned cardiovascular intervention within 30 days after study intervention
  • Clinical instability including decompensated heart disease
  • Life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Active peptid ulcer or upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 6 months
  • Ongoing systemic infection

Paraclinical exclusion criteria

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <35 %
  • Renal function with eGFR <30 mL/min
  • Pregnant or nursing

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Lithoplasty lesion preparation
Balloon lithoplasty will be used as lesion preparation.

The lithoplasty balloon should be utilized as early as possible. If it is necessary for passage of the lithoplasty balloon, the lesion may first be predilated with an undersized conventional balloon, non-compliant or semi-compliant. If passage of the lithoplasty balloon is still not possible, it is recommended to perform rotational atherectomy with a small burr size.

The lithoplasty balloon is sized 1:1 to reference diameter. Lithoplasty is performed with the balloon dilated at 4 atmospheres, and 10 shocks are delivered, after which the balloon is expanded to 6 atmospheres for 30 seconds, and then deflated. Up to 8 series of balloon expansion/deflation can be delivered in this manner if necessary, and several balloons may be used for long lesions.

Other Names:
  • Lithotripsy
  • Shockwave
Active Comparator: Conventional lesion preparation
Conventional and modified balloons will be used as lesion preparation.
Lesion preparation is performed starting with conventional balloons, non-compliant or semi-compliant. Unless fully satisfactory dilatation is achieved with conventional balloons, it is recommended to also use modified balloons (scoring balloons, cutting balloons). If balloons cannot be passed or if dilatation is inadequate, the lesion may first be predilated with an undersized conventional, non-compliant, or semi-compliant balloon. If necessary, rotational atherectomy with a small burr size can be used to facilitate adequate balloon preparation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with combined outcome of strategy failure
Time Frame: 1 year

Failed stent delivery, residual area stenosis ≥ 20% (OCT-assessed) after PCI, or target vessel failure.

Residual area stenosis will be defined as [minimal stent area/reference area]. The reference area will be calculated by averaging the proximal and distal reference areas, which will be determined by measuring the lumen contours on most healthy-looking frame of the final OCT in the 0-5 mm edge segments. If a reference cannot be measured on the final OCT, it will be measured on a pre-stent OCT or by using quantitative coronary angiography if pre-stent OCT is unavailable. Target vessel failure will be defined as cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, or clinically driven target vessel revascularization).

1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with composite and components of in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
Time Frame: In-hospital during and immediately after procedure
Cardiac death, Any myocardial infarction, Stroke
In-hospital during and immediately after procedure
Number of patients with in-hospital procedure-related adverse events
Time Frame: In-hospital during and immediately after procedure
Periprocedural myocardial infarction, Coronary dissection (beyond intended by lesion preparation), Coronary perforation/rupture, Coronary abrupt closure, Coronary low flow/no flow, Arrhythmia
In-hospital during and immediately after procedure
Number of patients with components of target vessel failure
Time Frame: 1 year
Cardiac death, Target vessel-related myocardial infarction, Clinically driven target vessel revascularization
1 year
OCT outcomes at index procedure
Time Frame: During procedure
Core-lab quantification of: Stent expansion, Stent malapposition, Quantified evidence of calcium disruption
During procedure
OCT outcomes at 1 year procedure
Time Frame: 1 year
Core-lab quantification of: In-stent late lumen loss, In-segment late lumen loss, In-segment re-stenosis, Stent malapposition, Quantified evidence of calcium disruption,
1 year
Number of patients with composite and components of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)
Time Frame: 1 year
Cardiac death, Any myocardial infarction, Stroke
1 year
Number of patients with composite of target vessel failure and its components at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Cardiac death, Target vessel-related myocardial infarction, Clinically driven target vessel revascularization
2 years
Overall mortality at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
Death due to any cause
1 year
Overall mortality at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Death due to any cause
2 years
Number of patients with components of the primary outcome
Time Frame: 1 year
Failed stent delivery, Residual area stenosis >20% (OCT-assessed) after PCI, Target vessel failure
1 year
Number of patients with primary endpoint and its composites at 2 years
Time Frame: 2 years
Failed stent delivery, residual area stenosis ≥ 20% (OCT-assessed) after PCI, or target vessel failure
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Niels Thue Olsen, MD, PhD, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 29, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 6, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be shared by request.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within 1 year of study completion.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests for access will be reviewed by the Steering Committee. A Data Access Agreement will be needed for access.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Lithoplasty

3
Subscribe