E-learning Proficiency Based Progression Training Programme for Clinical Communication on ISBAR Performance (eISBAR) (eISBAR)

May 1, 2018 updated by: Nora McCarthy, University College Cork

The Effect of an E-learning Proficiency Based Progression Training Programme for Clinical Communication on ISBAR Performance

Objective:

To determine the effectiveness of proficiency based inter-professional communication training in an online environment on medical student's use of the ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) communication escalation protocol in the deteriorating patient

Setting: The study will be conducted in University College Cork, Ireland. Participants: Fifth year medical students, who are scheduled to undertake ISBAR training as part of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) programme.

Intervention: Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three groups for training before undertaking a performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a low fidelity simulation environment: HSE group (the national e-learning programme only); S group (national e- learning plus access to online scenarios and facilitator when requested) and PBP group (national e-learning plus access to online scenarios training course with in-built proficiency-based progression, and facilitator when requested).

Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The first successful simulation validation study used a proficiency-based progression methodology. Since then the approach has been successfully deployed to produce superior technical skills but has not yet been validated for non-technical (communication) skills. It has also not yet been validated through the medium of virtual learning. The ISBAR (Identify, Situation, Background, Assessment and Recommendation) has been selected as the standardised tool for clinical communication in relation to an acutely deteriorating patient in many healthcare organisations worldwide, including Ireland.

The aim of this study is to explore whether proficiency-based progression (PBP) could be applied to an e-learning training course for ISBAR performance to produce a superior skill set.

The study will compare performance outcomes of students who receive the national e-learning programme only with those who receive it in combination with either standard e-learning course with scenarios or proficiency-based progression (PBP) e-learning course with scenarios.

Participants will be prospectively randomized to one of three training groups. Following a pre-test observation through low-fidelity simulation, they will then undergo their respective training courses before undertaking a post-test performance assessment of an ISBAR communication relevant to a deteriorating patient in a low fidelity simulation environment:

  1. Online learning only (HSE) -the national e-learning programme only
  2. Scenarios (S) -national online learning plus online scenario course training
  3. Proficiency based progression (PBP) -national online learning plus proficiency-based progression online scenario course training.

Main outcome and measures: A proficiency benchmark on the performance of ISBAR communication in the context of an acutely deteriorating patient.

All participants will be required to supply baseline demographic information before undertaking the training.

Performance metrics have previously been identified, operationally defined and agreed upon at a modified Delphi panel meeting consisting of medical experts for a series of paper-based simulation cases and a standardised high fidelity simulation case used as the assessment case. This case will be used in this study in a low fidelity environment. The proficiency benchmark for each case has been set based on the performance of experienced medical personnel on each case as a series of steps, errors and critical errors.

Outcome assessment will be scored by reviewing auditory recordings of ISBAR performance by each participant on the standardised case in the low fidelity simulated environment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

114

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cork, Ireland
        • University College Cork

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • final year medical students in UCC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lack of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: National e-learning programme only (HSE)
Active Comparator: National e-learning programme only (HSE) National e-learning programme only Recent successful completion of the National e-learning programme by certificate will be displayed. Students then undergo performance assessment via low fidelity simulation and complete a questionnaire.
National HSE e-learning programme only
Active Comparator: eS: eScenarios
Recent successful completion of the National e-learning e-learning programme by certificate will be displayed. Students will proceed to an online learning course with 4 scenarios to work through but no requirement to meet a proficiency benchmark. Following training students undergo performance assessment via low fidelity simulation and complete a questionnaire.
National e-learning programme plus access to 4 scenarios in an online learning course and facilitator when requested
Experimental: ePBP: eProficiency Based Progression
Recent successful completion of the National e-learning programme by certificate will be displayed. Students will proceed to a PBP e-learning course using the same series of cases as S. PBP students will be scored according to predefined metrics and will be required to reach proficiency benchmarks for the cases within the e-learning course to allow progression through the cases. Following training students undergo performance assessment via low fidelity simulation and complete a questionnaire.
National e-learning programme plus Proficiency-based progression through 4 scenarios in an online learning course and facilitator when requested

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of those reaching the benchmark on the assessment case
Time Frame: 12 months
Independent review by two blinded assessors of audio recorded ISBAR phone call conducted in the low fidelity simulation setting
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recording of data in learning management system for various course attempts
Time Frame: 12 months
recording of data in learning management system for various course attempts
12 months
Number of completed steps
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of successfully completed steps as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case
12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of total errors
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of total errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case
12 months
Number of errors/critical errors
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of errors/critical errors as predefined by the metrics for the assessment case
12 months
Number of attempts required to reach proficiency on each of the 4 cases in ePBP
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of attempts required to reach proficiency on each of the 4 cases as recorded by the e-learning course ePBP
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Anthony Gallagher, PhD, Director Technology Enhanced Learning ASSERT, UCC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 17, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 18, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2018

Last Verified

May 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Communication

Clinical Trials on HSE

Subscribe