A Trial Looking at Treating Dry Mouth After Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer (LEONIDAS-2)

October 29, 2021 updated by: University College, London

Long-term Evaluation of the Effectiveness Of a Novel Intra-oral Electro-stimulator for the Treatment of raDiotherapy-ASsociated Dry Mouth

This trial is looking at using an intra-oral electrostimulating device for the management of radiotherapy-induced dry mouth.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Dry mouth is a common complaint of radiotherapy for cancer of the head and neck region. It is a distressing often persistent condition which can lead to longlasting oral discomfort, dental infections, diminished quality of life, social isolation and loneliness. Unfortunately, current therapies of dry mouth are often unsatisfactory, expensive and may result in adverse effects. A novel intraoral electronic device has recently been developed to treat dry mouth. The device, acting as a "salivary pacemaker", harmlessly stimulates nerves of the salivary glands and does not cause adverse side effects. The aim of this proposal is to assess the longterm effects of such a device in this population, which have yet to be investigated, to demonstrate whether its daily application is an effective method of lessening dry mouth and improving life quality. 84 individuals will be enrolled in the study to use the device for 12 months, after receiving appropriate instructions. 42 participants (out of 84) will act as controls as they will receive a sham device that will not deliver electric stimuli but only tactile stimulation (like using a chewing gum). All participants will be allowed to continue using their routine local therapy for dry mouth (e.g. artificial saliva) during the study. Each participant will keep a diary relevant to the frequency of use and potential changes in dry mouth sensation. Participants will also be asked to attend hospital appointments to measure changes in saliva production and complete questionnaires on their dry mouth and quality of life. The device has the potential to radically change current clinical practice. If the trial is successful, the use of the device will provide patients having radiation-induced dry mouth with a safe and drug-free therapeutic modality.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. To be at least 18 years old
  2. To have received more than 40 Gy of external beam RT for cancer in the H&N region at least 4 months before entry into the study
  3. To have grade 1 or 2 of RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema
  4. To have a degree of minimum degree of dryness of 50mm (≥50mm) on a 100mm VAS scale (0=no dryness; 100

    =maximum dryness).

  5. To have demonstrable residual salivary gland function (increase in salivary flow on appropriate stimulation (e.g. chewing paraffin wax)
  6. To have at least one parotid gland

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. To have severe uncontrolled systemic disease (on the basis of the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology: ASA IV and ASA V)
  2. To have known allergy to materials similar to those used in the investigational product
  3. To wear other active implants such as cardiac pacemaker or defibrillator, or hearing aids
  4. To have an unstimulated whole salivary flow of 0ml/15min (complete absence of unstimulated salivary flow as measured via sialometry for 15 minutes).
  5. To use of pilocarpine as systemic therapy
  6. To have grade 3 RTOG/EROTC or no resting saliva (sialometry = 0mL/1.5 min)
  7. To have no parotid glands

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Active electrostimulator device (intra-oral active second generation Saliwell GenNarino) (Saliwell Ltd., Harutzim, Israel)
Patients who will receive a fully functioning device
Sham Comparator: Group B
Sham electrostimulator device (intra-oral sham second generation Saliwell GenNarino) (Saliwell Ltd., Harutzim, Israel)
Patients who will receive a device that does not release electric stimuli (but provided mechanical/tactile stimulation)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement of subjective perception of dry mouth as measured on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame: 12 month
The primary outcome is defined as the proportion of patients reporting a 30% reduction of xerostomia symptoms as evaluated through a 100mm VAS (100mm=maximum dryness).
12 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Salivary function
Time Frame: 12 month
Improvement of objective salivary function as measured through 5-minutes sialometry
12 month
Head and Neck cancer Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 month
Improvement in head and neck quality of life as measured on the EORTC QLQ-H&N35
12 month
Oral Health Quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 month
Improvement in oral health quality of life as measured on the OH-QoL16 questionnaire
12 month
General quality of Life
Time Frame: 12 month
Improvement in general quality of life as measured on the SF-36 questionnaire
12 month
Participant compliance
Time Frame: 12 month
Evaluation of patients' tolerance in using the device by using a diary to record daily measurement.
12 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr Stefano Fedele, PhD, University College, London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 20, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 21, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2021

Last Verified

October 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Active Electrostimulator device

Subscribe