Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors (TGCT) Observational Platform Project (TOP)

January 12, 2023 updated by: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

A Disease Registry for Patients With Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors (TGCT), Also Known as Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis (PVNS) and Giant Cell Tumor of the Tendon Sheath (GCT-TS)

TGCT is a rare disease that is difficult to manage, surgical resection is the primary treatment currently available. To date no disease registry exists and there is little data available detailing the management of patients with diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT), the burden of d-TGCT for patients (including pain, joint stiffness, swelling, reduced mobility and quality of life) or the economic impact of d-TGCT.

This study aims to collect data by an observational disease registry involving no intervention to the patient or changes to investigators treatment decisions.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

GCT is a rare, benign, but potentially locally aggressive and recurrent disease. Treatment pattern and treatment initiation, continuation or changes are solely at the discretion of the physician and the patient.

There will be no attempt to influence the prescribing patterns of any individual treating physician. All medication will be prescribed in the usual standard of care and will not be provided by the study sponsor.

Participation in the study will in no way influence payment or reimbursement for any treatment received by patients during the study.

It is the responsibility of the investigator and his study staff to enter all relevant patient data required for this registry in the electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) and in the patients' medical records.

Approximately 15 sites from up to 6 European Countries (France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain and United Kingdom) and 4 sites from the US are planned to participate. The sites will be specialized sites that treat d-TGCT regularly.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

183

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria, 8036
        • Medizinische Universität Graz
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU Nantes
      • Essen, Germany, 45122
        • Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum
      • Bologna, Italy, 40136
        • Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli
      • Milano, Italy, 20133
        • Istituto Nazionale Tumori-Foundazione IRCCS
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333
        • Leiden University Medical Center
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
        • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08041
        • Hospital Sant Pau
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Del Rocio
      • London, United Kingdom, SW3 6JJ
        • The Royal Marsden Hospital
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 7LD
        • Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California San Francisco
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study enrolled patients with d-TGCT.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent for participation in the study (ICF)
  • Patients with d-TGCT (diagnosed histologically) confirmed naïve or recurrent case

Exclusion Criteria:

  • As this is a non interventional study, no explicit exclusion criteria have been defined

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants According to the Management Plan in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
The management plan received among the patients was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Number of Participants According to the Current TGCT Treatment Plan in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
The current TGCT treatment plan among the patients was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Number of Participants Based on Type of Treatment Plan in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Type of treatment plan received among the patients was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Number of Participants Based on Status of Treatment Plan in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
The status of treatment plan among the patients was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Number of Participants Based on Type of Current TGCT Treatment in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Type of current TGCT treatment among the patients was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Number of Participants Based on Tumor Severity Classification at Baseline Based on MRI in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: at Baseline
Tumor severity classification was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records. ). Tumor severity classification was based on MRI. In this classification scheme, moderate diffuse TGCT is characterized by intra- and/or extra-articular disease, without or with involvement of muscle/tendinous tissue/ligaments. Severe diffuse TGCT is characterized by intra- and extra-articular involvement and involvement of at least one of the 3 structures (muscle/tendinous tissue/ligaments).
at Baseline
Number of Cases With Complications Due to Surgery in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: at Baseline (prior to any d-TGCT therapy)
Complications due to surgery were collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
at Baseline (prior to any d-TGCT therapy)
Number of Participants With Tumor Recurrence at Baseline in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: at Baseline
Tumor recurrence was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
at Baseline
Time Since Most Recent Tumor Recurrence Until Baseline in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: at Baseline
Time since most recent tumor recurrence was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
at Baseline
Time From Baseline to First Tumor Recurrence in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Time from baseline to first tumor recurrence was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Mean Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Pain Severity and Interference Score From Baseline Through 24 Months
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
The BPI short form is a self administered questionnaire that assesses severity of pain, impact of pain on daily function, location of pain, pain medications and amount of pain relief in the past 24 hours or the past week. The BPI pain severity and interference score ranges from 0 (pain does not interfere) to 10 (pain completely interferes), where lower scores indicate better clinical outcome.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Mean Worst Stiffness Score From Baseline Through 24 Months
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
The Worst Stiffness numerical rating scale (NRS) is a one-item self-administered, patient-reported outcome questionnaire assessing the "worst" stiffness in the last 24 hours. The NRS for this item ranges from 0 ("no stiffness") to 10 ("stiffness as bad as you can imagine"), where lower scores indicate better clinical outcome.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Mean PROMIS Physical Function Score From Baseline Through 24 Months
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health. Physical function scores range from 0 (worst physical function) to 100 (best physical function, where higher scores indicate better clinical outcome.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean EuroQol Questionnaire (EQ) of 5 Dimensions (5D) Index Score and EQ Visual Analog Scale Score From Baseline Through 24 Months
Time Frame: Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire measures the patient's quality of life (QoL) based on the 5 dimensions mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D index score ranges from 0 (worst QoL) to 1 (best QoL), where lower scores indicate worse clinical outcome. The EQ-5D VAS reports patient's self rated health ranging from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health you can imagine), where lower scores indicate worse clinical outcome.
Baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Mean Number of General Practitioner, Specialist, or Physical Therapy Visits to Assess the Health Resource Utilization in Patients With Diffuse TGCT Through 24 Months
Time Frame: 13-24 months before baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Health resource utilization was assessed by mean number of general practitioner visits, specialist visits, and physical therapy sessions. In addition, the mean number of days in rehabilitation and the number of work days missed were also reported.
13-24 months before baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Median Number of Days in Rehabilitation and Work Days Missed in Patients With Diffuse TGCT Through 24 Months
Time Frame: 13-24 months before baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
The median number of days in rehabilitation and the number of work days missed were also reported.
13-24 months before baseline up to end of observation period (approximately 2 years)
Overall TGCT Outcome Status in Patients With Diffuse TGCT (d-TGCT)
Time Frame: At end of observation period (approximately 2 years post-baseline)
TGCT outcome status was collected from information routinely recorded in the patient files / medical records.
At end of observation period (approximately 2 years post-baseline)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Global Clinical Leader, Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 18, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 11, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 24, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2016

First Posted (Estimated)

October 28, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) and applicable supporting clinical trial documents may be available upon request at https://vivli.org/. In cases where clinical trial data and supporting documents are provided pursuant to our company policies and procedures, Daiichi Sankyo will continue to protect the privacy of our clinical trial participants. Details on data sharing criteria and the procedure for requesting access can be found at this web address: https://vivli.org/ourmember/daiichi-sankyo/

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Studies for which the medicine and indication have received European Union (EU) and United States (US), and/or Japan (JP) marketing approval on or after 01 January 2014 or by the US or EU or JP Health Authorities when regulatory submissions in all regions are not planned and after the primary study results have been accepted for publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Formal request from qualified scientific and medical researchers on IPD and clinical study documents from clinical trials supporting products submitted and licensed in the United States, the European Union and/or Japan from 01 January 2014 and beyond for the purpose of conducting legitimate research. This must be consistent with the principle of safeguarding study participants' privacy and consistent with provision of informed consent.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Giant Cell Tumors

3
Subscribe