- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02948231
MERIT Study - Mistral Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair FIM Study (MERIT)
The Mistral is an investigational device intended for percutaneous trans-catheter repair in high risk for surgery individuals suffering from functional Mitral Regurgitation.
The device system is to be used only in accordance with the approved Investigational Plan on subjects who have signed an informed consent form. Device use is limited to the approved study investigators.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The study is designed to clinically demonstrate device acute safety (Primary Endpoint) along with longer FU device safety and effectiveness evaluation (Secondary Endpoint).
The main objectives of the study are :
- Evaluate the Acute safety of the implanted Mistral device post procedure and at 30 day follow up period.
- Evaluate the long term Safety of the device (3 and 6 months follow up).
- Demonstrate effectiveness of the Mistral device in improving MR.
Primary endpoints:
• Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event. At discharge and 30 days.
Secondary endpoints:
- • Safety: Safety at 3 and 6 months. Rate of SAEs and device related SAEs at 3, 6 and 12months.
- Effectiveness: MR reduction post-procedure, at discharge and 30 days, 3 and 6 and 12 months. Improved NYHA class and 6MWT distance at 30 days, 3 and 6 and 12 months.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Antwerpen, Belgium, 2020
- ZNA Middelheim
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is willing and able to comply with all required follow-up evaluations
- Genders eligible for the study: Both genders
- Subject has functional MR of grade 3+ or more
- Subject has left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >20 % and < 40%.
- No contraindications to trans-septal puncture
- Subject is of functional class 3 or more (NYHA)
- The subject is high risk to undergo MV surgery.
- Subject is excluded from other standard of care procedures as determined by center heart team.
- Patients with femoral veins enabling catheterization with 12Fr catheters
- Life expectancy ≥ 1 year
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mitral Stenosis ≥ moderate
- Aortic Stenosis/Insufficiency > moderate
- Subvalvular calcification or calcification of the chordae.
- Subject has a prosthesis valve in the mitral position
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) within 30 days prior to subject registration
- Subject has a history of a cerebral vascular accident (CVA) or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within the past 3 months.
- Subject has a history of a myocardial infarction (MI) in the past 3 months
- Subject refuses blood transfusion or surgical valve replacement.
- Subject has had a percutaneous interventional or other invasive cardiac or peripheral procedure ≤ 7 days of the index procedure
- Subject has a history of, or has active endocarditis
- Subject has echocardiographic evidence of intra-cardiac mass, thrombus, vegetation or soft-mobile deposits
- Subject is in acute pulmonary edema.
- Subject has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support.
- Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulant or antiplatelet medication
- Subject has renal insufficiency as evidenced by a serum Creatinine > 3.0mg/dL.
- Subject has ongoing infection or sepsis
- Subject has blood dyscrasias (leukopenia, acute anemia, thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis, or coagulopathy)
- Subject has an active peptic ulcer or has had gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within the past 3 months prior to the index procedure
- Subject requires emergency surgery for any reason
- Subject has a known allergy to Nitinol alloys, 316L\304 stainless steel.
- Pregnant or lactating women.
- Patients being dependent upon the sponsor or upon the investigator or upon the investigational site.
- Subject has a known contrast media allergy
- Presence of high degree atrio-ventricular block (2nd or 3rd degree A-V block), or the presence of tri-fascicular block
- According to investigator on site the patient is suffering from a severe end stage disease (e.g. malignancy, severe pulmonary disease, liver disease, renal failure) and has a life expectancy of less than 1 year.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Mistral
|
Mistral Implant is implanted in the Mitral valve
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event.
Time Frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
|
Safety: Acute safety. Rate of device related SAE including device related mortality, stroke, MI, cardiac tamponade, surgery for failed percutaneous repair and non-elective cardiovascular surgery to treat an adverse event.
Time Frame: at 30 days post-procedure
|
at 30 days post-procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Time Frame: at 3 months post procedure
|
at 3 months post procedure
|
|
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Time Frame: at 6 months post procedure
|
at 6 months post procedure
|
|
Safety: Rate of device related SAE
Time Frame: at 12 months post procedure
|
at 12 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time Frame: at 30 days post procedure
|
at 30 days post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time Frame: at 3 months post procedure
|
at 3 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time Frame: at 6 months post procedure
|
at 6 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time Frame: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
|
Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
|
|
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time Frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
|
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time Frame: at 30 days post procedure
|
at 30 days post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time Frame: at 3 months post procedure
|
at 3 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time Frame: at 6 months post procedure
|
at 6 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: MR Grade reduction.
Time Frame: at 12 months post procedure
|
at 12 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent).
Time Frame: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
|
Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
|
|
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time Frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
|
Effectiveness: NYHA class (categorization of heart failure extent)
Time Frame: at 12 months post procedure
|
at 12 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time Frame: Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
|
Post procedure (1 hour after implant device has been implanted)
|
|
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time Frame: Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
Until hospital discharge - up to 5 days post procedure day
|
|
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time Frame: at 30 days post procedure
|
at 30 days post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time Frame: at 3 months post procedure
|
at 3 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time Frame: at 6 months post procedure
|
at 6 months post procedure
|
|
Effectiveness: 6MWT distance.
Time Frame: at 12 months post procedure
|
at 12 months post procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- CL-133
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Regurgitation
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve RegurgitationUnited States
-
Ancora Heart, Inc.CompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Regurgitation | Functional Mitral RegurgitationAustria, Lithuania, Germany
-
Heinrich-Heine University, DuesseldorfCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationGermany
-
Xiao-dong ZhuangNot yet recruitingMitral Regurgitation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerative Mitral Valve RegurgitationChina
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedMitral Valve Regurgitation | Mitral Valve Incompetence | Mitral Insufficiency | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Mitral Stenosis With InsufficiencyJapan
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedFunctional Mitral Regurgitation | Degenerrative Mitral RegurgitationRussian Federation
-
Medtronic CardiovascularRecruitingMitral Valve RegurgitationUnited States, Canada, Denmark
-
Heart Repair Technologies, Inc.Na Homolce HospitalTerminatedMitral RegurgitationCzechia
-
Abbott Medical DevicesAbbottCompletedMitral Regurgitation | Mitral Valve RegurgitationJapan
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoActive, not recruitingMitral RegurgitationItaly
Clinical Trials on Mistral implantation
-
MitralixCompletedTricuspid Valve RegurgitationGermany
-
MitralixCompletedTricuspid Valve RegurgitationIsrael
-
MitralixRecruitingTricuspid Valve RegurgitationIsrael
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompletedTemperature Change, BodyTurkey
-
University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandLivaNova; Biotronik FranceUnknown
-
Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCompleted
-
Gottsegen National Cardiovascular InstituteBiotronik SE & Co. KGRecruitingSudden Cardiac Death Due to Cardiac Arrhythmia | Mitral Valve | Loop Recorder | Arrhythmia Ventricular | Mitral Annular DisjunctionHungary
-
Ningbo No.2 HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Vissum, Instituto Oftalmológico de AlicanteInstituto de Salud Carlos III; Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheCompletedKeratoconus | Treatment | Therapy | Corneal Dystrophy | Ophthalmological DisorderSpain
-
Yong-Mei ChaRecruiting