Long-term Study of Teduglutide in Pediatric Subjects With Short Bowel Syndrome Who Completed the TED-C13-003 Study

May 18, 2021 updated by: Shire

A Retrospective and Prospective, Open-label, Long-term Safety and Efficacy Study of Teduglutide in Pediatric Subjects With Short Bowel Syndrome Who Completed TED-C13-003

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of teduglutide treatment of children with short bowel syndrome (SBS) who completed the TED-C13-003 study over a long-term period. It will evaluate how these children fared after the TED-C13-003 study ended. This study will also offer teduglutide treatment to eligible subjects, regardless of treatment received in TED-C13-003.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

29

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
        • Great Ormond Children's Hospital
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90027
        • Childrens Hospital Los Angeles - RHU
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
        • Riley Hospital for Children
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Boston Children's Hospital
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64108
        • Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics
    • New York
      • Bronx, New York, United States, 10467
        • Children's Hospital at Montefiore
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45229
        • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Texas Children's Hospital
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98105
        • Seattle Children's Hospital
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53792
        • University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject provides written informed consent (subject, parent or legal guardian and, as appropriate, subject informed assent) to participate in the study before completing any study-related procedures.
  2. Subject completed the TED-C13-003 study (including subjects in the standard of care treatment arm).
  3. Subject understands and is willing and able to fully adhere to study requirements as defined in this protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

There are no exclusion criteria for this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Standard of Care (SOC) Treatment +/- Teduglutide
TED 0.05mg/kg subcutaneous injections once daily as needed in addition to SOC treatment
0.05mg/kg
Standard safety assessments and adjustments in nutritional support will be provided for all subjects throughout the study, including any teduglutide treatment periods

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) in Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: From end of the core study (TED-C13-003 [NCT01952080]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, was life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect, was an important medical event. Number of participants with AEs, related AEs, serious adverse events (SAEs) and related SAEs of retrospective observation period were reported.
From end of the core study (TED-C13-003 [NCT01952080]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
Change From Baseline in Height for Age Z-score up to Week 168 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
Height was measured using age Z-score. Z-score was calculated as (observed value - median value of the reference population) / standard deviation value of reference population. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (age greater than or equal to [>=] 2 years old) and World Health Organization (age less than [<] 2 years old) Z-score calculation charts are used for calculation. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in height for age Z-score up to Week 168 of retrospective observation period was reported. Data for this outcome was not planned to be collected and analyzed in retrospective TED/TED group.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Age Z-score up to Week 168 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
Body weight was measured using age Z-score. Z-score was calculated as (observed value - median value of the reference population) / standard deviation value of reference population. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (age >= 2 years old) and World Health Organization (age < 2 years old) Z-score calculation charts are used for calculation. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in body weight for age Z-score up to Week 168 was reported. Data for this outcome was not planned to be collected and analyzed in retrospective TED/TED group.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) for Age Z-score up to Week 168 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
BMI Z-score was calculated by using the retrospective height and weight data. Z-score was calculated as (observed value - median value of the reference population) / standard deviation value of reference population. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (age >= 2 years old) and World Health Organization (age < 2 years old) Z-score calculation charts are used for calculation. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in height for age Z-score up to Week 168 of retrospective observation period was reported. Data for this outcome was not planned to be collected and analyzed in retrospective TED/TED group.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to the beginning of the prospective period (up to Week 168)
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: From the beginning of the prospective study period to End of Study (EOS) (up to Week 144)
TEAEs are defined as AEs that started or worsened on or after the first dose of teduglutide treatment in the core study. A SAE was any untoward medical occurrence (whether considered to be related to investigational product or not) that at any dose: results in death, was life-threatening, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital abnormality/birth defect, was an important medical event. AESI was an TEAE or TESAE of scientific and medical concern specific to the sponsor's product or program and for which ongoing monitoring and immediate notification by the investigator to the sponsor. Number of participants With TEAEs, treatment -emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) and adverse events of special interest (AESI) of Prospective study period were reported.
From the beginning of the prospective study period to End of Study (EOS) (up to Week 144)
Change From Baseline in Height for Age Z-score up to Cycle 6 Week 12 During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 12
Height was measured using age Z-score. Z-score was calculated as (observed value - median value of the reference population) / standard deviation value of reference population. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (age >= 2 years old) and World Health Organization (age < 2 years old) Z-score calculation charts are used for calculation. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in height for age Z-score up to Cycle 6 Week 12 during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 12
Change From Baseline in Body Weight for Age Z-score up to Cycle 6 Week 24 During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 24
Body weight was measured using age Z-score. Z-score was calculated as (observed value - median value of the reference population) / standard deviation value of reference population. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (age >= 2 years old) and World Health Organization (age < 2 years old) Z-score calculation charts are used for calculation. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in body weight for age Z-score up to Cycle 6 Week 24 during the end of teduglutide treatment period of prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 24
Change From Baseline in BMI for Age Z-score up to Cycle 6 Week 12 During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 12
BMI Z-score was calculated by using the height and weight data. Z-score was calculated as (observed value - median value of the reference population) / standard deviation value of reference population. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (age >= 2 years old) and World Health Organization (age < 2 years old) Z-score calculation charts are used for calculation. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean. Change from baseline in BMI for age Z-score up to Cycle 6 Week 12 during the end of teduglutide treatment period of prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 12
Average Total 48-Hour Urine Output up to Cycle 6 Week 12 During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 12
Average total urine output was calculated based on the daily data recorded in participants diaries over a 48-hour period of nutritional stability prior to each scheduled visit. Average total 48-Hour urine output up to Cycle 6 Week 12 during the end of teduglutide treatment period of prospective study period was reported. Here, mL/kg/day is abbreviated as milliliter per kilogram per day.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 12
Average Total 48-Hour Urine Output up to Week 108 During the End of Non-Teduglutide Treatment (NTT) Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Week 108
Average total urine output was calculated based on the daily data recorded in participants diaries over a 48-hour period of nutritional stability prior to each scheduled visit. Average total 48-Hour urine output up to Week 108 during the end of NTT period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Week 108
Average Number of Stools Per Day up to Cycle 6 Week 24 During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 24
Average number of stools per day was calculated based on the daily data recorded in participants diaries over a 48-hour period of nutritional stability prior to each scheduled visit. Average number of stools per day up to cycle 6 week 24 during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Cycle 6 Week 24
Average Number of Stools Per Day up to Week 120 During the End of NTT Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Week 120
Average number of stools per day was calculated based on the daily data recorded in participants diaries over a 48-hour period of nutritional stability prior to each scheduled visit. Average number of stools per day up to Week 120 during the end of NTT period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period) up to Week 120
Number of Participants With Positive Specific Antibodies at EOS During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: From the beginning of the prospective study period, EOS (up to Week 156)
Number of participants with positive specific antibodies to teduglutide were used to summarize the presence of antibodies.
From the beginning of the prospective study period, EOS (up to Week 156)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Achieved At Least 20 Percent (%) Reduction in Parenteral Support (PS) Volume at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: At Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Number of participants achieved at least 20% reduction in PS volume at 12 weeks interval up to Week 156 in retrospective observation period was reported.
At Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Change From Baseline in PS Volume at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Change from baseline in PS volume at 12 weeks interval up to Week 156 in retrospective observation period was reported.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Percent Change From Baseline in PS Volume at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Percent change from baseline in PS volume at 12 weeks interval up to Week 156 of retrospective observation period was reported.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Change From Baseline in PS Caloric Intake at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Change from baseline in PS caloric intake at 12 weeks interval up to Week 156 of retrospective observation period was reported. Here, kilo-calories per kilogram per day was abbreviated as (kcal/kg/day).
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Percent Change From Baseline in PS Caloric Intake at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Percent change from baseline in PS caloric intake at 12 weeks interval up to Week 156 of retrospective observation period was reported.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Change From Baseline in Number of Hours Per Day of PS Usage at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to Week 156
Data for this outcome measure was not analyzed and collected because changes from baseline for prescribed hours per day were not collected at baseline in the core study.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to Week 156
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Hours Per Day of PS Usage at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to Week 156
Data for this outcome measure was not analyzed and collected because changes from baseline for prescribed hours per day were not collected at baseline in the core study. Hence, percent change was not assessed in this study.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]) up to Week 156
Change From Baseline in Number of Days Per Week of PS Usage at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Change from baseline in number of days per Week of PS usage at 12 weeks interval up to Week 156 in retrospective observation period was reported.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Days Per Week of PS Usage at 12 Weeks Interval up to Week 156 of Retrospective Observation Period
Time Frame: Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Percent change from baseline in number of days per Week of PS usage at 12 weeks interval up to Week 156 in retrospective observation period was reported.
Baseline (Baseline visit in the core study [TED-C13-003 (NCT01952080)]), Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, and 156
Number of Participants Who Achieved At Least 20, 50 and 75% Reduction in PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: At EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 140) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 20 weeks)
Number of participants who achieved at least 20, 50 and 75% reduction in PS volume at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
At EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 140) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 20 weeks)
Change From Baseline in PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Change from baseline in PS volume at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent Change From Baseline in PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent change from baseline in PS volume at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Change From Baseline in PS Caloric Intake at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Change from baseline in PS caloric intake at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent Change From Baseline in PS Caloric Intake at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent change from baseline in PS caloric intake at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Number of Participants Who Achieved 100% Reduction in Complete Weaning of PS Volume at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: At EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 144) (length of each Cycle 1 to 6 = 24 weeks)
Number of participants who achieved at least 100% reduction in complete weaning of PS volume at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
At EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 144) (length of each Cycle 1 to 6 = 24 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Number of Hours Per Day of PS Usage at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Change from baseline in number of hours per day of PS usage at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Hours Per Day of PS Usage at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent change from baseline in number of hours per day of PS usage at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Change From Baseline in Number of Days Per Week of PS Usage at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Change from baseline in number of days per week of PS usage at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent Change From Baseline in Number of Days Per Week of PS Usage at EOT of Each Cycle During the End of Teduglutide Treatment Period of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)
Percent change from baseline in number of days per week of PS usage at EOT of each cycle during the end of teduglutide treatment period in prospective study period was reported.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), EOT of each Cycles 1 to 6 (up to Week 136) (length of each Cycle 1 to 5 = 24 weeks, length of Cycle 6 = 16 weeks)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scale (GCS) Score at Week 12 and 24 of Each Treatment Cycle During the Teduglutide Treatment Periods of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), Week 12 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6
PedsQL GCS was used for quality of life assessment. It encompasses 4 dimensions of functioning (physical, emotional, social, school). Age groups are: Toddler (2-4 years), Young child (5-7 years), Child (8-12 years), and Teens (13-18 years). Depending on the participants age, the questionnaire may be completed by either the participant or the parent/caregiver as appropriate. For the Toddler group, the PedsQL GCS consisted of 21 items, using a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4); for all other groups, the PedsQL GCS consisted of 23 items, with a 3-point Likert scale (0, 2, 4) for the young child, and a 5-point Likert scale for the child and teens groups. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores indicate improved quality of life.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), Week 12 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6
Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Generic Core Scale (GCS) Score at End of Last NTT Period During the NTT Periods in Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), End of Last NTT period (up to Week 120)
PedsQL GCS was used for quality of life assessment. It encompasses 4 dimensions of functioning (physical, emotional, social, school). Age groups are: Toddler (2-4 years), Young child (5-7 years), Child (8-12 years), and Teens (13-18 years). Depending on the participants age, the questionnaire may be completed by either the participant or the parent/caregiver as appropriate. For the Toddler group, the PedsQL GCS consisted of 21 items, using a 5-point Likert scale (0 to 4); for all other groups, the PedsQL GCS consisted of 23 items, with a 3-point Likert scale (0, 2, 4) for the young child, and a 5-point Likert scale for the child and teens groups. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 where 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores indicate improved quality of life.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), End of Last NTT period (up to Week 120)
Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Family Impact Module Total Score at Week 12 and 24 of Each Treatment Cycle During the Teduglutide Treatment Periods of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), Week 12 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6
PedsQL Family Impact Module was composed of 36 items comprising Physical Functioning (6 items), Emotional Functioning (5 items), Social Functioning (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (5 items), Communication (3 items), Worry (5 items), Daily Activities (3 items) and Family Relationships (5 items). Total score was calculated as the sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the scales. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 were 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores indicate improved quality of life.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), Week 12 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6
Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Family Impact Module Total Score at End of Last NTT Period During the NTT Periods in Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of to the end the prospective study period), End of Last NTT period (up to Week 120)
PedsQL Family Impact Module was composed of 36 items comprising Physical Functioning (6 items), Emotional Functioning (5 items), Social Functioning (4 items), Cognitive Functioning (5 items), Communication (3 items), Worry (5 items), Daily Activities (3 items) and Family Relationships (5 items). Total score was calculated as the sum of all the items over the number of items answered on all the scales. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 were 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores indicate improved quality of life.
Baseline (from the beginning of to the end the prospective study period), End of Last NTT period (up to Week 120)
Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Gastrointestinal Symptoms Module at Week 12 and 24 of Each Treatment Cycle During the Teduglutide Treatment Periods of Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), Week 12 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6
PedsQL GI symptoms module was composed of 58 items, comprised of 10 different symptom scales that assess gastrointestinal symptom-related quality of life: food and drink limits, trouble swallowing, heartburn and reflux, nausea and vomiting, gas and bloating, constipation, blood in poop, and diarrhea. Only the scales of food and drink limits (6 items) and diarrhea (7 items) was used in this study. Subscale score was calculated as the sum of the items over the number of items answered in the scale. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 were 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores indicate improved quality of life.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), Week 12 and 24 of Cycles 1 to 6
Change From Baseline In Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Gastrointestinal Symptoms Module at End of Last NTT Period During the NTT Periods in Prospective Study Period
Time Frame: Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), End of Last NTT period (up to Week 120)
PedsQL GI symptoms module was composed of 58 items, comprised of 10 different symptom scales that assess gastrointestinal symptom-related quality of life: food and drink limits, trouble swallowing, heartburn and reflux, nausea and vomiting, gas and bloating, constipation, blood in poop, and diarrhea. Only the scales of food and drink limits (6 items) and diarrhea (7 items) was used in this study. Subscale score was calculated as the sum of the items over the number of items answered in the scale. Scores are transformed on a scale from 0 to 100 were 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, and 4=0. Higher scores indicate improved quality of life.
Baseline (from the beginning of the prospective study period), End of Last NTT period (up to Week 120)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shire Study Physician, Shire

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 9, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 31, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • Study Protocol
  • Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP)
  • Informed Consent Form (ICF)
  • Clinical Study Report (CSR)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Short Bowel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Teduglutide

3
Subscribe