The Novel US-C-A-B Protocol: Curriculum Implementation and Evaluation of Proficiency

February 21, 2017 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Ultrasound is a frequently used diagnostic tool in the emergency department and suggested to have a role during resuscitation. The aims of this study were to develop a novel, resuscitative ultrasound-circulation-airway-breathing (US-C-A-B) protocol, to implement a short curriculum and to assess the feasibility.

The US-C-A-B protocol was built in an advanced life support-compliant manner. It involved a 3-part assessment: (1) C: subxiphoid 4-chamber view of the heart; (2) A: tracheal ultrasound; and (3) B: bilateral lung sliding. It could be used for direct confirmation for the C-A-B and searching the possible cause of cardiac arrest.

A half-day curriculum was designed, and comprised of one-hour didactics and 3-hour small-group hand-on training. Assessments were performed, including a written test, the US image acquisition and a satisfaction survey. From August 1, 2014 to March 31, 2016, the multi-center emergency physicians who attended the US-C-A-B curricula were enrolled prospectively.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ultrasound is a frequently used diagnostic tool in the emergency department and suggested to have a role during resuscitation. The aims of this study were to develop a novel, resuscitative ultrasound-circulation-airway-breathing (US-C-A-B) protocol, to implement a short curriculum and to assess the feasibility.

The US-C-A-B protocol was built in an advanced life support-compliant manner. It involved a 3-part assessment: (1) C: subxiphoid 4-chamber view of the heart; (2) A: tracheal ultrasound; and (3) B: bilateral lung sliding. It could be used for direct confirmation for the C-A-B and searching the possible cause of

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • Recruiting
        • National Taiwan University Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The enrolled participants were emergency physicians of the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH), the Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital (FEMH) and the Chang-Kung Memorial Hospital (CKMH), three teaching hospitals in Taiwan.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not emergency physicians.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: ultrasound training
The aims were to develop a novel, resuscitative ultrasound-circulation-airway-breathing (US-C-A-B) protocol, to implement a short curriculum for ultrasound training and to assess the feasibility.
Through the ultrasound-circulation-airway-breathing training curriculum to integrate the ultrasound into clinical practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The time of the US image acquisition
Time Frame: 6 months
The 6-month evaluation was performed in cardiac arrest patients. The ultrasound operation time was from the time to initiate the ultrasound exam to when the sonographers to inteprete the results, using the ultrasound recorder.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Learning efficacy was assessed with a written test with 10 multi-choice questions.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The written test with 10 multi-choice questions, including ALS knowledge, and still US image interpretation of C-A-B was performed before and after completion of the course.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
A satisfaction survey with a 5-point Likert scale.
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The post-course satisfaction survey queried the participants in regards to educational value, knowledge acquisition and self-confidence at the end of the course. The survey consisted of 5 items, using a 5-point Likert scale.
through study completion, an average of 1 year
The time of the US image acquisition
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
The participants were asked for to produce adequate views of each C-A-B category and consecutive C-A-B exams in the same live model after completion, recorded by the DVD recorder. The time to achieve the views was measured from positioning of the probe on the skin to maintaining an adequate image for at least 3 seconds. The videos were edited that the faces of the participants were covered, and reviewed blindly and independently by the authors. The 6-month evaluation was performed in cardiac arrest patients. The ultrasound operation time was from the time to initiate the ultrasound exam to when the sonographers to inteprete the results, using the ultrasound recorder.
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Wan-Ching Lien, Ph.D., National Taiwan University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 26, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

November 2, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 21, 2017

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 201505089RINA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound Therapy; Complications

Clinical Trials on ultrasound training

Subscribe