Emotional Intelligence Program for Adolescents With Antisocial Behavior (DYNAMIS) (DYNAMIS)

January 26, 2024 updated by: Universidad del Valle, Colombia

Results of an Emotional Intelligence Program for Adolescent Offenders Based on Salovey and Mayer's Ability Model.

This study assessed the effectiveness of an emotional intelligence program based on the Salovey and Mayer model among adolescents exhibiting antisocial behavior. A quasi-experimental design was employed, involving 231 Colombian adolescent offenders (122 in the experimental group). A 12-session psychological protocol was implemented. The primary question it aims to address is whether it is feasible for adolescents with antisocial behavior to reduce negative emotional symptoms related to mental health, such as anxiety, stress, and depression, while simultaneously improving their emotional skills. It was observed that those who completed the program showed significant improvements in emotional intelligence, emotional balance, and resilience while experiencing a decrease in emotional symptoms, particularly in stress.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Emotional intelligence programs have been shown to enhance mental health, social adjustment, and overall well-being in adolescents, primarily implemented in educational settings but adaptable to specific clinical populations. The goal of this study was to assess the effectiveness of an emotional intelligence program tailored for adolescents with antisocial behavior based on the Salovey and Mayer ability model. Given previous findings suggesting that emotional intelligence programs can aid in improving mental health and social adjustment in adolescents, there arises a need to evaluate the efficacy of such programs in correctional settings. This study aimed to ascertain the effectiveness of an emotional intelligence program designed for adolescents with antisocial behavior. It also supported the notion that implementing emotional intelligence programs in socio-educational centers working with such adolescents could be an effective strategy to enhance their psychological and social well-being. Additionally, it highlights the necessity of incorporating emotional intelligence training in intervention processes within correctional contexts.

The study employed a quasi-experimental design with both intervention and control groups, conducting pre-post intervention measures. The study involved 231 Colombian adolescent participants aged between 14 and 18 (Mean = 15.55, SD = 1.30), with 122 in the intervention group (Mean = 15.64, SD = 1.29, 19.7% female) and 109 in the control group (Mean = 15.44, SD = 1.30, 27.5% female). Questionnaires were utilized to evaluate emotional intelligence, emotional experiences, resilience, emotional symptoms (depression, anxiety, and stress), and life satisfaction.

The comparative analyses revealed significant differences between the intervention and control groups. Adolescents who completed the program demonstrated improvements in emotional intelligence, emotional balance, and resilience while experiencing a notable reduction in emotional symptoms, particularly stress.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

231

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Valle Del Cauca
      • Cali, Valle Del Cauca, Colombia, 760042
        • Arcadio de Jesús Cardona Isaza

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The inclusion criteria were being enrolled in the first year or higher grades of secondary education, having parental and authority permission, and being between 14 and 18 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The exclusion criteria were being younger than 14 or older than 18, openly refusing to participate, lacking authorization, and having the scheduled completion of the judicial measure during the program execution period.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
Does not receive intervention
The program is based on the emotional intelligence skills model (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Salovey & Mayer, 1990), which suggests that emotional intelligence consists of four hierarchical branches or components: (a) perception of emotions, (b) facilitating thinking using emotions, (c) understanding emotions, and (d) managing and handling emotions. The program comprises 12 sessions and additional activities to be carried out after each session, alongside counseling from the program's leading professionals. The sessions follow a similar structure, involving session framing, motivation on the central theme, group activity for sharing ideas and experiences, individual activities, review, and task assignment. The first and second sections focus on analyzing the personal reality and current emotional conditions of the participants, while the final session is designed for both celebration and program evaluation. The remaining nine sessions address the four branches of the skill model.
Experimental: Experimental
A 12-session psychological program The intervention program consisted of 12 sessions of 80 minutes with a weekly frequency. The first session was diagnostic, and the following nine correspond to the following topics: perception (2), facilitation (2), labeling and understanding (2), emotional regulation, and management (3). The last session was evaluative. The intervention included practical tasks in context and supervision by clinical psychologist.
The program is based on the emotional intelligence skills model (Mayer & Salovey, 1997; Salovey & Mayer, 1990), which suggests that emotional intelligence consists of four hierarchical branches or components: (a) perception of emotions, (b) facilitating thinking using emotions, (c) understanding emotions, and (d) managing and handling emotions. The program comprises 12 sessions and additional activities to be carried out after each session, alongside counseling from the program's leading professionals. The sessions follow a similar structure, involving session framing, motivation on the central theme, group activity for sharing ideas and experiences, individual activities, review, and task assignment. The first and second sections focus on analyzing the personal reality and current emotional conditions of the participants, while the final session is designed for both celebration and program evaluation. The remaining nine sessions address the four branches of the skill model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional Intelligence
Time Frame: 4 months
Attention, Clarity and Emotional Repair. Trait Meta Mood Scale (TMMS-24)
4 months
Emotional symptoms of mental health
Time Frame: 4 months. The scale rates emotional symptoms from normal to extremely severe. Depression (0-9, normal- 28+ extremely severe). Anxiety (0-7, normal- 20+ extremely severe). Stress (0-4, normal- 34+ extremely severe.
Depression, anxiety and stress scale (DASS-21)
4 months. The scale rates emotional symptoms from normal to extremely severe. Depression (0-9, normal- 28+ extremely severe). Anxiety (0-7, normal- 20+ extremely severe). Stress (0-4, normal- 34+ extremely severe.
Positive and negative emotional experiences
Time Frame: 4 months. The items are presented on a Likert scale ranging from "Very rarely or never" to "Very often or always" (5).(Range 5-30)
Positive and negative emotional experiences (SPANE)
4 months. The items are presented on a Likert scale ranging from "Very rarely or never" to "Very often or always" (5).(Range 5-30)
Emotional Intelligence
Time Frame: 4 months. It offers five alternative answers. High scores on the factors indicate a higher degree of emotional intelligence.
Attention, Clarity and Emotional Repair. Trait Meta Mood Scale (TMMS-24)
4 months. It offers five alternative answers. High scores on the factors indicate a higher degree of emotional intelligence.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Affective balance
Time Frame: 4 months. The affective balance scale is derived from the difference between the two SPANE sub-scales (SPANE-P and SPANE-N).
Positive and negative emotional experiences scale (SPANE)
4 months. The affective balance scale is derived from the difference between the two SPANE sub-scales (SPANE-P and SPANE-N).
Satisfaction with life
Time Frame: 4 months. Scores between 31-35 indicate the individual is very satisfied; 26-30, satisfied; 21-25, somewhat satisfied; 20, neutral; 15-19, somewhat dissatisfied; 10-14, dissatisfied; and 5-9, very dissatisfied.
Satisfaction with life Scale (SWLS)
4 months. Scores between 31-35 indicate the individual is very satisfied; 26-30, satisfied; 21-25, somewhat satisfied; 20, neutral; 15-19, somewhat dissatisfied; 10-14, dissatisfied; and 5-9, very dissatisfied.
Resilience
Time Frame: 4 months. It consists of 10 items designed as a Likert-type scale with five response options. The final score for the questionnaire is obtained by summing the responses (range 0-40).
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10)
4 months. It consists of 10 items designed as a Likert-type scale with five response options. The final score for the questionnaire is obtained by summing the responses (range 0-40).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1102812
  • PSI2017-84005-R (Other Grant/Funding Number: Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are available whit request to the authors.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Undefined

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data that support the findings of this study are available whit request to the authors.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Health Wellness 1

3
Subscribe