- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02977871
Bladder Flap Versus Omission of Flap During Cesarean Section of Primiparous Women
November 30, 2016 updated by: Berna Aslan Cetin, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
A Randomized Trial Comparing Bladder Flap Versus Omission of Flap During Cesarean Section of Primiparous Women
Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed on women.
Over the years minor variations of each surgical step have been introduced, and cesarean sections are not standardized and many different techniques are employed during surgery.
Creation of a bladder flap has been an integral surgical step of the cesarean section for many years.
The role of the bladder flap and its usefulness in cesarean section is not known well.
Further, in some cases the bladder flap is omitted during cesarean section.
The aim of the current study is to compare operating time and postoperative urinary symptoms in cesarean sections using either bladder flap or omission of flap.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Cesarean section is the most common surgical procedure performed on women.
The main aspects of the surgical approach to low-transverse cesarean delivery have not changed much since1926.
Over the years minor variations of each surgical step have been introduced, and cesarean sections are not standardized and many different techniques are employed during surgery.
Creation of a bladder flap has been an integral surgical step of the cesarean section for many years.
The evidence on the role of the bladder flap and its usefulness in cesarean section is very limited.
In emergent cesarean sections where rapid delivery is the main goal, the bladder flap is usually omitted.
Literature about the usefulness of a bladder flap is limited and more randomized studies are needed.
Most of the study outcomes were focusing operating time however, the investigator in the current study additional focused on postoperative urinary symptoms and dynamics.
The aim of the current study is to compare operating time and postoperative urinary symptoms in cesarean sections using either bladder flap or omission of flap.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
201
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Istanbul, Turkey, 34303
- Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 40 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
Female
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- primiparous women >37 weeks without high-risk pregnancy
Exclusion Criteria:
- presence of microbiologically confirmed urinary tract infection before delivery, twin pregnancies, cervical dilatation at admission ≥4 cm, estimated fetal weight>4000 gr, history of previous abdominal surgery
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: No Bladder Flap group
Routine uterine incision performed during cesarean section without incision and dissection of the bladder peritoneum.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: Bladder Flap group
Routine uterine incision performed during cesarean section with an incision and a dissection of a bladder flap.
|
Performing uterine incision and cesarean section with a bladder flap.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total operation time
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Total operation time from skin incision to the end of operation
|
1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Estimated blood loss
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Estimated blood loss during surgery will be measured in terms of mL
|
1 hour
|
|
Bladder injury
Time Frame: up to 48 hour
|
Bladder injury during cesarean section will be assessed by the number and percentage of patients who had injury
|
up to 48 hour
|
|
Urinary retention
Time Frame: up to 48 hour
|
Postoperative urinary retention will be measured by number and percentage of patients who develop this complication
|
up to 48 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Berna Aslan Cetin, MD,ObGyn, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Pelosi MA 2nd, Pelosi MA 3rd. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;105(4):900; author reply 901. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000158756.29999.0a. No abstract available.
- Wood RM, Simon H, Oz AU. Pelosi-type vs. traditional cesarean delivery. A prospective comparison. J Reprod Med. 1999 Sep;44(9):788-95.
- Berghella V, Baxter JK, Chauhan SP. Evidence-based surgery for cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Nov;193(5):1607-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.063.
- Mahajan NN. Justifying formation of bladder flap at cesarean section? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009 Jun;279(6):853-5. doi: 10.1007/s00404-008-0838-6. Epub 2008 Nov 19.
- O'Neill HA, Egan G, Walsh CA, Cotter AM, Walsh SR. Omission of the bladder flap at caesarean section reduces delivery time without increased morbidity: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:20-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.020. Epub 2013 Dec 22.
- Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Fogertey P, Roehl K, Stamilio D, Macones GA. Utility of the bladder flap at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Apr;119(4):815-21. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31824c0e12.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
July 1, 2016
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 1, 2016
Study Completion (Actual)
November 1, 2016
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 21, 2016
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 25, 2016
First Posted (Estimate)
November 30, 2016
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
December 1, 2016
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 30, 2016
Last Verified
November 1, 2016
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1828 (Other Identifier: VA IRB)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section Niche
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityCompletedPregnancy | Cesarean Section | Elective Cesarean SectionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research...CompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Ataturk UniversityUnknownCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; Complications, Wound, Dehiscence | Cesarean Section, Repeated | Cesarean, Uterine Scar Thickness | Cesarean, Residual Myometrial ThicknessTurkey
-
Asfendiyarov Kazakh National Medical UniversityCenter for Perinatology and Pediatric Surgery, Almaty, Kazakhstan; Zhalyn Scientific...RecruitingSkin Wound Healing After Cesarean Section | Cesarean Section Scar HealingKazakhstan
-
Odense University HospitalHvidovre University Hospital; Smith & Nephew, Inc.; University of Southern Denmark and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgical Wound Infection | Cesarean Section; Dehiscence | Complications; Cesarean Section | Infection; Cesarean Section | Complications; Cesarean Section, Wound, Dehiscence | Wound; Rupture, Surgery, Cesarean SectionDenmark
-
Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research HospitalCompletedCesarean Section Complications | Cesarean Section; DehiscenceTurkey
-
Chiayi Christian HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital, BordeauxMinistry of Health, FranceRecruiting
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedCesarean SectionUnited States
Clinical Trials on Bladder flap
-
Alexandria UniversityCompletedCS Scar Defect(Niche) How to AvoidEgypt
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted
-
Assiut UniversityUnknown
-
Mountain Area Health Organization CenterUnknown
-
National Naval Medical CenterCompleted
-
West China HospitalUnknown
-
St Vincent's University Hospital, IrelandPelvExCompletedRectal Cancer | Pelvic Cancer | Flap Necrosis | Flap Disorder | Perioperative Complication | Flap IschemiaIreland
-
Recep Tayyip Erdogan UniversityEnrolling by invitationSoft Tissue InjuriesTurkey
-
The National Institute of LymphologyThe DrMarga Practice Group; The Center for Restorative Breast Surgery, LLCUnknownBreast Cancer | Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer (brca1, brca2) | Congenital Lymphedema | Acquired LymphedemaUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompleted