- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03014479
Study of the QOL Evaluation of Trelagliptin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (TRENDS)
December 7, 2023 updated by: Takeda
The purpose of this study is to assess the reduction in treatment burden during 12 weeks of trelagliptin administration in patients with type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise therapy only.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to assess the reduction in treatment burden during 12 weeks of trelagliptin administration in patients with type 2 diabetes on diet and exercise therapy only.
Eligible participants will be randomized to either the study drug (trelagliptin) group or the comparative drug (daily DPP-4 inhibitor) group.
Treatment burden will be assessed using Diabetes Therapy Related -QOL (DTR-QOL) questionnaire and Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
219
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Osaka, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 16
-
-
Aichi
-
Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 17
-
Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 18
-
-
Gunma
-
Kanra, Gunma, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 25
-
-
Hyogo
-
Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 9
-
-
Ibaraki
-
Koga, Ibaraki, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 27
-
-
Kanagawa
-
Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 14
-
Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 11
-
Yamato, Kanagawa, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 10
-
-
Miyagi
-
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 4
-
Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 5
-
-
Nara
-
Kashihara, Nara, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 3
-
-
Osaka
-
Kashiwara, Osaka, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 15
-
Suita, Osaka, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 1
-
-
Saitama
-
Okegawa, Saitama, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 24
-
-
Tochigi
-
Oyama, Tochigi, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 26
-
-
Tokyo
-
Adachi-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 23
-
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 6
-
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 7
-
Edogawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 22
-
Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 19
-
Ota-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 21
-
Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 12
-
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 13
-
Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 20
-
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 2
-
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
- Takeda Selected Site 8
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants diagnosed as type 2 diabetes.
- Participants with a stable diet and exercise therapy only for at least 12 weeks prior to the start of the screening period.
- Participants who require a DPP-4 inhibitor treatment.
- Participants with Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) >=6.5 % and <10.0 % at the start of the screening period.
- Participants who completed DTR-QOL questionnaire at the start of the screening period.
- Participants who have received less than 2 types of medication for treatment of comorbidities (such as hypertension or dyslipidemia) at the start of the screening period (any number of daily doses).
- Participants who, in the opinion of the principal investigator or the investigator, are capable of understanding the content of the clinical study and complying with the study protocol requirements.
- Participants who can provide the written informed consent prior to the initiation of any study procedures.
- Participants aged >=20 years at the time of informed consent.
- Outpatient.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants who are receiving any oral anti-diabetic medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes at the start of the screening period.
- Participants diagnosed with type 1 diabetes.
- Participants with severe renal impairment or renal failure (e.g., estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 or on dialysis).
- Participants with serious heart disease or cerebrovascular disorder, or serious pancreatic, blood, or other disease.
- Participants with a history of gastrointestinal resection.
- Participant with a proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
- Participant with malignancy.
- Participants with a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to DPP-4 inhibitors.
- Pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the study period.
- Participants who may need to add or discontinue concomitant medication or change the dose during the study period.
- Participants who will require treatment with a prohibited concomitant medication during the study period.
- Participants participating in other clinical studies.
- Participants assessed ineligible in the study by the principal investigator or the investigator.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Trelagliptin
Trelagliptin 100 mg, orally, once weekly for up to 12 weeks.
Trelagliptin 50 mg, orally, once weekly for up to 12 weeks in patients with moderate renal impairment.
|
Trelagliptin 100 mg or 50 mg
|
Active Comparator: Daily DPP-4 inhibitors
An inhibitor orally administered at the dosage and administration in the package inserts for each drug, for up to 12 weeks.
|
Alogliptin, anagliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, teneligliptin or vildagliptin
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the Diabetes Therapy Related -QOL (DTR-QOL) Questionnaire at the End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 1: Burden on Social Activities and Daily Activities] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 2: Anxiety and Dissatisfaction With Treatments] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 3: Hypoglycemia] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Each Factor Provided Through the DTR-QOL Questionnaire [Factor 4: Satisfaction With Treatment] at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12, and the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) at Each Assessment Time Point
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12 and the end of study (Week 12)
|
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level.
Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks.
Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to Week 4, 12 and the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Use of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
Reported data was the score stratified by the use of medication for treatment of comorbidities at baseline (Used/ Not used).
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Use of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level.
Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks.
Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
Reported data was the score stratified by the use of medication for treatment of comorbidities at baseline (Used/ Not used).
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Daily Doses of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Times or ≥2 Times) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Daily Doses of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Times or ≥2 Times) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level.
Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks.
Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Total Number of Daily Tablets of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Tablets or ≥2 Tablets) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Total Number of Daily Tablets of Medication for Treatment of Comorbidities (<2 Tablets or ≥2 Tablets) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level.
Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks.
Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for All Question Items in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Doses of the Study Drug or Comparative Drug (Once Weekly, Once Daily or Twice Daily) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Total Score for Questions About Treatment Satisfaction in the DTSQ at the End of Study Stratified by the Number of Doses of the Study Drug or Comparative Drug (Once Weekly, Once Daily or Twice Daily) at Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level.
Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks.
Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to the end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Score Per Question in the DTR-QOL Questionnaire at the End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
|
DTR-QOL Questionnaire is a self-reported instrument assessing impact of diabetes treatment on health-related QOL.
It includes 29 items across 4 subscales; Factor 1: Burden on social activities and daily activities (13 questions), Factor 2: Anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment (8 questions), Factor 3: Hypoglycemia (4 questions) and Factor 4: Treatment satisfaction (4 questions).
Each item is scored ranging from 1 to 7. Every score of the questions in Factor 1-3 and the score in Factor 4 converted into reverse (1-7 will be converted to 7-1) will be simply added up, and scores of each factor and the total figure will be subsequently converted from 0 to 100 (the best and worst scores will be equivalent to 100 and 0).
Higher scores reflect better QOL and positive changes relative to baseline indicate improvement of QOL.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
|
Change From Baseline in Score Per Question in the the DTSQ at the End of Study
Time Frame: Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
|
The DTSQ is a self-reported instrument consists of 6 questions about treatment satisfaction and 2 questions regarding blood sugar level.
Each question answered on a 7-point Likert scale from 0 to 6, based on concern with the diabetes treatment and experiences in the past few weeks.
Higher total score for questions about treatment satisfaction indicate greater satisfaction with treatment and experiences.
|
Baseline (Week 0), up to end of study (Week 12)
|
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment.
An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Hypoglycemia
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
|
Duration of Hospitalization for Type 2 Diabetes (Excluding Educational Hospitalization Without Worsening of Diabetes)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
The investigators checked any hospitalization of study participants for type 2 diabetes after the first administration of the study drug or comparative drug (excluding educational hospitalization without worsening of diabetes).
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Number of Participants With Hospitalization for Type 2 Diabetes (Excluding Educational Hospitalization Without Worsening of Diabetes)
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Study Director, Takeda
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 18, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 21, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
October 21, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 5, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 5, 2017
First Posted (Estimated)
January 9, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
December 22, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 7, 2023
Last Verified
December 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Trelagliptin-4002
- JapicCTI-173482 (Registry Identifier: JapicCTI)
- U1111-1189-9256 (Registry Identifier: WHO)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available for all interventional studies after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received (or program is completely terminated), an opportunity for the primary publication of the research and final report development has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com
for details).
To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias.
Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes
-
Antonio Di MauroCompletedType-2 DiabetesItaly
-
DiaMedica Therapeutics IncCompletedDiabetes Type 2Netherlands
-
RenJi HospitalUnknownType 2 Diabetes.China
-
University of Erlangen-Nürnberg Medical SchoolCompletedType 2-diabetesGermany
-
Chengdu Brilliant Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.Not yet recruitingType 2 Diabetes Mellitus
-
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical UniversityRecruitingType 2 Diabetes MellitusChina
-
Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityRecruitingType 2 Diabetes MellitusChina
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited States
-
Imperial College LondonAstraZeneca; Huma; North West London Collaboration of CCGs (NWL CCGs); Imperial...CompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusUnited Kingdom
-
Universiti Sains MalaysiaCompleted
Clinical Trials on Trelagliptin
-
TakedaCompletedType 2 Diabetes MellitusJapan
-
TakedaCompleted
-
TakedaCompleted
-
British University In EgyptNermeen Ashoush; Shereen Mowaka; Mariam M. TadrosUnknownDiabetes MellitusEgypt
-
CSPC ZhongQi Pharmaceutical Technology Co., Ltd.CompletedDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2China
-
British University In EgyptCompleted
-
TakedaCompleted
-
TakedaCompleted
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedHealthyKorea, Republic of