Specified Drug-Use Survey of Trelagliptin Tablets "Survey on Long-term Use in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus"

December 7, 2023 updated by: Takeda
The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of trelagliptin tablets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the routine clinical setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The drug being tested in this survey is called trelagliptin tablet. This tablet is being tested to treat people who have type 2 diabetes mellitus.

This survey is an observational (non-interventional) study and will look at the long-term safety and efficacy of the trelagliptin tablet in the routine clinical setting. The planned number of observed patients will be approximately 3000.

This multi-center observational trial will be conducted in Japan.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3198

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Takeda selected site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the routine clinical setting

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Have severe ketosis, diabetic coma or precoma, or type 1 diabetes mellitus
  2. Have severe infection, perioperative status, or serious trauma
  3. Have severe renal impairment or on dialysis due to end-stage renal disease
  4. Have a history of hypersensitivity to any ingredients of this drug

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Trelagliptin 100 mg
Trelagliptin 100 mg tablet, orally, once weekly for up to 36 months. Participants received interventions as part of routine medical care.
Trelagliptin tablets
Other Names:
  • Zafatek tablets

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Events
Time Frame: 36 months
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.
36 months
Number of Participants Who Had One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
Time Frame: 36 months
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. Adverse drug reaction refers to AE related to administered drug.
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Mean Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was the change in the mean value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was the change in the mean value of fasting blood glucose collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was the change in the mean value of fasting insulin level collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beat-cell Function (HOMA-beta)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was the change in the mean value of HOMA-beta. HOMA-beta measures as following; HOMA-beta = fasting insulin (microU/mL) ×360/ [fasting glucose (mg/dL) - 63].
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucagon
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was the change in the mean value of fasting glucagon collected between baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 8.0 Percent)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control (defined as reduction in HbA1c values < 8.0 Percent) at baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 7.0 Percent)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control (defined as reduction in HbA1c values < 7.0 Percent) at baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good Glycemic Control (Reduction in HbA1c Values < 6.0 Percent)
Time Frame: Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)
The reported data was percentage of participants who achieved good glycemic control (defined as reduction in HbA1c values < 6.0 Percent) at baseline and timepoints (up to final assessment point: Month 36).
Baseline, up to final assessment point (up to Month 36)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Study Director, Takeda

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Trelagliptin-5001
  • JapicCTI-183980 (Registry Identifier: JapicCTI)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

IPD from eligible studies will be shared with qualified researchers according to the criteria and process described on https://vivli.org/ourmember/takeda/. For approved requests, the researchers will be provided access to anonymized data (to respect patient privacy in line with applicable laws and regulations) and with information necessary to address the research objectives under the terms of a data sharing agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Clinical Trials on Trelagliptin

3
Subscribe