- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03016923
Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) for Upper Extremity Hemiplegia in Children With Cerebral Palsy
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Functional Electrical Stimulation Paired With Intensive Therapy to Improve Hand Function in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Functional electrical stimulation (FES) has increasingly gained interest as a therapeutic intervention for the improvement of motor function in individuals with disabilities. FES involves the administration of electrical pulses to stimulate motor neurons and initiate muscle contractions, It has been used primarily for individuals with spinal cord injury or those who have experienced a stroke leading to the loss of or decreased motor function of the limbs. The repeated application of FES to the affected limb has been shown to enable individuals with hemiplegia to voluntarily control movements of the affected upper limb. A new FES system, has recently been developed and indicated for use for the improvement of arm and hand function in patients with hemiplegia due to stroke or spinal cord injury. FES is a non-invasive therapy that involves transcutaneous delivery of electrical stimulation to the affected upper limb, patient participation and the assistance of therapists to improve voluntary arm and hand movements such as reaching and grasping.
The new FES system has shown effectiveness in both adults with acute stroke and children with chronic acquired stroke. In a randomized controlled trial, FES paired with intensive therapy compared to intensive therapy alone was shown to significantly improve hand function for adults with acute stroke. Participants in the trial had limited mobility or complete immobility of the affected arm and those who received FES paired with intensive therapy had clinically significant improvements in hand movements compared to those who only received intensive therapy. Recently, transcutaneous FES paired with intensive hand therapy (3 one-hour sessions per week for 16 weeks) has more recently been shown to improve hand function in children with chronic acquired stroke.
The efficacy of FES seen in patients with stroke opens up the possibility for its use in other similar populations, including children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy (HCP). However, there is currently limited research on the efficacy of FES with this population. In a preliminary study, the use of FES alone over a treatment period of 6 weeks in children with HCP was shown to significantly improve wrist movement. However, most of the research to date on the effects of FES on children with HCP has been focused on gait and lower limb function. There is currently a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of FES paired with intensive therapy on hand function in children with HCP. FES paired with intensive therapy holds significant potential to improve the hand function of children with HCP and warrants further investigation.
Therefore, the proposed research seeks to address two main objectives:
- To investigate the effectiveness of FES to improve upper limb function in children with HCP.
- To assess the effects of FES on upper limb function in children with HCP at six months post-intervention.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of hemiplegic CP
- Age between 6 to 18 years
- Ability to cooperate, understand and follow instructions during the administration of FES paired with intensive hand therapy
- Baseline total QUEST score between 20-80 out of 100 points
- Be seizure-free for a required period of at least 1 year with or without medication , and have no prior history of known cardiac arrhythmias/stimulants
- No pacemaker or implanted metallic or electronic device
- No edema, skin rash, allergy or wound on the affected upper limb where FES will be administered.
- No Botulinum toxin upper limb injections within 6-months of study entry, and no Constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) within 4 months of study entry. Participants should also refrain from receiving these treatments throughout the duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- The participant's forearm is too small to accommodate the standard FES electrodes.
The participant's muscles do not respond to the electrical stimulation as tested at the baseline assessment visit. Response to electrical stimulation will be tested at the baseline visit and is described in detail in the section entitled "Muscle Responsiveness Testing" below. Based on the Muscle Responsiveness Testing procedures and criteria, the withdrawal criteria for non-response to electrical stimulation is defined as:
- More than 3 muscle groups out of 11 not- responding to FES or
- The participant reports a discomfort level score of 8 or 10 on the FACES scale (Appendix A) for any of the 11 muscle groups.
- Participant receives any other active occupational therapy or hemiplegic hand intervention during the FES intervention period.
- Participant attends less than 36/48 FES intervention sessions.
- Participant develops new-onset seizures during the FES intervention period.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: FES Therapy
FES therapy will be administered over the course of 1 hour sessions that will be take place 3 times per week over 16 weeks, for a total of 48 sessions.
|
FES therapy will be administered over the course of 1 hour sessions that will be take place 3 times per week over 16 weeks, for a total of 48 sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Quality of Upper Extremities Skills Test (QUEST) as a measure of Movement patterns and hand function
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) as a measure of change in a child's self-perception of occupational performance over time
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Grip Strength Test as a measure of hand and forearm muscular strength
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Jebsen-Taylor Test of Hand Function (JTTHF) as a measure of hand functions required in activities of daily living
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e., prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention. JTTHF will also be assessed at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks during the intervention period.
|
Change from Baseline (i.e., prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention. JTTHF will also be assessed at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, and 16 weeks during the intervention period.
|
Children's Hand-use Experience Questionnaire (CHEQ) as a measure of children's experience in using the affected hand in bi-manual activities
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Proprioception Task as a measure of joint-position sense
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Two-point Orientation Discrimination (2POD) as a measure of tactile spatial acuity
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Stereognosis Test as a measure of is the ability to recognize and identify common objects through tactile manipulation without the use of visual cues
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Change from Baseline (i.e, prior to intervention), at 4 months post-intervention, and at 6 months post-intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Darcy Fehlings, MD, MSc, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Staudt M, Gerloff C, Grodd W, Holthausen H, Niemann G, Krageloh-Mann I. Reorganization in congenital hemiparesis acquired at different gestational ages. Ann Neurol. 2004 Dec;56(6):854-63. doi: 10.1002/ana.20297.
- Sheffler LR, Chae J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation in neurorehabilitation. Muscle Nerve. 2007 May;35(5):562-90. doi: 10.1002/mus.20758.
- Kapadia NM, Nagai MK, Zivanovic V, Bernstein J, Woodhouse J, Rumney P, Popovic MR. Functional electrical stimulation therapy for recovery of reaching and grasping in severe chronic pediatric stroke patients. J Child Neurol. 2014 Apr;29(4):493-9. doi: 10.1177/0883073813484088. Epub 2013 Apr 12.
- Thrasher TA, Zivanovic V, McIlroy W, Popovic MR. Rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function in severe hemiplegic patients using functional electrical stimulation therapy. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008 Nov-Dec;22(6):706-14. doi: 10.1177/1545968308317436.
- Kawashima N, Popovic MR, Zivanovic V. Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: case study of a patient with chronic stroke. Physiother Can. 2013 Winter;65(1):20-8. doi: 10.3138/ptc.2011-36.
- Quandt F, Hummel FC. The influence of functional electrical stimulation on hand motor recovery in stroke patients: a review. Exp Transl Stroke Med. 2014 Aug 21;6:9. doi: 10.1186/2040-7378-6-9. eCollection 2014.
- Meadmore KL, Exell TA, Hallewell E, Hughes AM, Freeman CT, Kutlu M, Benson V, Rogers E, Burridge JH. The application of precisely controlled functional electrical stimulation to the shoulder, elbow and wrist for upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Jun 30;11:105. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-105.
- Golomb MR, Garg BP, Saha C, Azzouz F, Williams LS. Cerebral palsy after perinatal arterial ischemic stroke. J Child Neurol. 2008 Mar;23(3):279-86. doi: 10.1177/0883073807309246.
- Prosser LA, Curatalo LA, Alter KE, Damiano DL. Acceptability and potential effectiveness of a foot drop stimulator in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012 Nov;54(11):1044-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2012.04401.x. Epub 2012 Aug 27.
- Wright PA, Granat MH. Therapeutic effects of functional electrical stimulation of the upper limb of eight children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000 Nov;42(11):724-7. doi: 10.1017/s0012162200001341.
- Postans NJ, Granat MH. Effect of functional electrical stimulation, applied during walking, on gait in spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005 Jan;47(1):46-52. doi: 10.1017/s0012162205000083.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-549
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
-
Northwestern UniversityActive, not recruitingCerebral Palsy | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy | Bilateral Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
Centre Médico-Chirurgical de Réadaptation des Massues...RecruitingCerebral Palsy, Dyskinetic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Infantile Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyFrance
-
St Mary's University CollegeUniversity of GloucestershireUnknownCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy Ataxic | Cerebral Palsy, MixedUnited Kingdom
-
Hilde FeysHasselt University; ETH Zurich; Curtin UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, SpasticBelgium
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institutes of Health (NIH)RecruitingDystonic Cerebral Palsy | Dyskinetic Cerebral PalsyUnited States
-
MTI UniversityEnrolling by invitationSpastic Diplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
East Carolina UniversityRecruitingHemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Remote Ischemic ConditioningUnited States
-
October 6 UniversityCompletedSpastic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
Marmara UniversityUnknownCerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, DiplegicTurkey
Clinical Trials on FES Therapy
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalAgência Brasileira de Desenvolvimento Industrial (Brazilian Agency For Industrial...Not yet recruitingBrain Injuries | Spinal Cord Injuries | Muscle AtrophyBrazil
-
Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteRick Hansen FoundationCompleted
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity of GlasgowCompleted
-
Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria PisanaCompletedSpinal Cord Injury at C5-C7 Level
-
Battelle Memorial InstituteCompleted
-
University Hospital of FerraraCompletedStroke | Arm Motor RecoveryItaly
-
Chang Gung UniversityMackay Memorial Hospital; Chang Gung Memorial HospitalCompleted
-
Shriners Hospitals for ChildrenCompletedSpinal Cord InjuryUnited States
-
University of AlbertaRoyal Alexandra Hospital; Glenrose FoundationCompletedAcute Spinal Cord InjuryCanada