ReNovaCell in Non-segmental Vitiligo

September 12, 2019 updated by: Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders

Autologous Cell Suspension Grafting Using ReNovaCell in Non-segmental Vitiligo Patients: a Randomized Controlled Study

Rationale:

Autologous epidermal cell suspension grafting is an effective method of surgical treatment in vitiligo, which is suitable for treating large areas with good cosmetic results. The RenovaCell Autologous Cell Harvesting Device (Avita Medical Europe Limited, Cambridge, UK) (previous name: ReCell) is a device which, compared to other forms of autologous epidermal cell suspension grafting, is easier in use showing similar results. Efficacy and safety of the ReCell device was proven in segmental vitiligo and piebaldism. However, the efficacy in non-segmental vitiligo is not yet confirmed in randomized controlled trials. The investigators hypothesize that grafting using the ReNovaCell device in combination with standard of care is also effective in stable non-segmental vitiligo and more effective than standard of care alone.

Objective:

Primary: to assess the efficacy and safety of ReNovaCell grafting combined with 311 nm UVB therapy and topical anti-inflammatory therapy for the treatment of stable non-segmental vitiligo. Secondary: to assess, satisfaction, cosmetic acceptability, noticeability and persistence of repigmentation after ReNovaCell transplantation.

Study design: Prospective, observer-blinded, randomised, within subject, controlled, study.

Study population: 20 patients ≥ 18 years with stable non-segmental vitiligo receiving standard of care (311 nm UVB therapy and topical anti-inflammatory therapy) for at least 6 months at the Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders (NIPD) at the Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam.

Intervention: In patients already receiving standard of care (311 nm UVB therapy + topical anti-inflammatory therapy) 2 comparable depigmented regions are randomised to receive ReNovaCell grafting or no grafting. Standard of care will be given according to the standard treatment protocol of our institute.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

Primary outcome:

Objective assessment of the degree of repigmentation three and six months after ReNovaCell grafting with a digital image analysis system. To assess the pigmentation, the contours of pigmentation are copied on a transparent sheet before, three and six months after treatment, after which the sheets are scanned and digital image analysis is used to compute the affected surface. By comparing pre- and post-treatment pictures, the relative surface showing repigmentation expressed as percentage of the selected treated patch is computed.

Secondary outcomes:

  • Patient Reported Outcomes: satisfaction, cosmetic acceptability, noticeability
  • General patient assessed outcome per treatment region on a scale from 0-3 (poor, moderate, good or excellent).
  • Visual assessment of percentage repigmentation by blinded observer and color match to normal skin
  • Visual assessment of side effects per treatment region (hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation and scarring on a scale from 0-3) by a blinded investigator.
  • A small amount of the suspension of the included patients and the redundant lesional punchgrafts of all patients will be used for flow cytometric analyses of the cellular composition of the grafted cell suspension, and expression analysis of melanin synthesis-related genes. These data will be correlated to the clinical data.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: As the study involves large depigmented lesions, which are too large to treat in regular surgical treatment (punch grafting), patients will not miss any regular treatment. The time investment for the patient will be approximately 20 minutes for the punchgrafting session, 75 minutes for the cell suspension grafting session and 15 minutes for the three follow-up visits. Two of the five visits are part of the standard of care UVB follow-up regimen and are therefore not additional due to the study. Infection in the grafted area or the donor site may occur but is very rare; the risk of mild textural changes in the donor site is moderate. Hyperpigmentation of the treated area does occur often, although this improves over time in most cases. In case of improvement of the depigmentation, patients may receive another treatment for the (contralateral) untreated side.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105AZ
        • Nipd / Amc

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with, non-segmental vitiligo receiving 6 months of standard of care, consisting of topical corticosteroids or immune modulators and NB-UVB phototherapy
  • Age ≥18
  • Patient is willing and able to give written informed consent
  • At least two comparable (in location and diameter) depigmented lesions of at least 10 cm2 or one large lesion of at least 30 cm2 on the extremities, face or trunk.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with signs of activity (spreading of lesions and/or koebnerisation) during standard of care treatment or showing depigmentation in the test punch grafting
  • Skin type I
  • Recurrent HSV skin infections
  • Hypertrophic scars
  • Keloid
  • Cardiac insufficiency
  • Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to (UVB or UVA) light and/or allergy to local anaesthesia.
  • Patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Patients not competent to understand what the procedures involves
  • Patients with a personal history of melanoma or non-melanoma skin cancer
  • Patients with atypical nevi.
  • Known allergy to clarithromycin

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: No ReNovaCell treatment
Lesion on the same patient that receives only standard therapy, no ReNovaCell treatment.
Experimental: ReNovaCell treatment
Lesion on the same patient that receives the ReNovaCell treatment
Other Names:
  • Autologous cell suspension grafting

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
degree of repigmentation
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months
Objective assessment of the degree of repigmentation three and six months after ReNovaCell grafting with a digital image analysis system.
3 and 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Reported Outcomes: satisfaction, cosmetic acceptability, noticeability
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Visual assessment of percentage repigmentation by blinded observer and color match to normal skin
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Visual assessment of side effects per treatment region
Time Frame: 6 months
Visual assessment of side effects per treatment region (hyperpigmentation, hypopigmentation and scarring on a scale from 0-3) by a blinded investigator
6 months
flow cytometric analyses of the cellular composition of the grafted cell suspension
Time Frame: at time of autologous cell suspension grafting
at time of autologous cell suspension grafting

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 16, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 16, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 12, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL57683.018.16

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitiligo

3
Subscribe