Morbidity in Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (MIOMIE)

January 26, 2017 updated by: Matthias Paireder, Austrian Society Of Surgical Oncology

Morbidity In Open Versus Minimally Invasive Hybrid Esophagectomy

The MIOMIE trial is a prospective randomized controlled study comparing open and laparoscopic gastric tube formation in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Aim of this trial was to compare the minimally invasive approach with the standard open procedure regarding morbidity and mortality.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Esophageal resection is still associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Standardized preoperative efforts could increase the outcome of these patients. While early reports of medical pioneers focused particularly on safety and feasibility, more recent studies showed that implementation of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was widely accepted. Since first reports of MIE, different techniques and adjustments have been discussed. A recent publication of a large prospective trial in Phase II showed the safety of a total minimally invasive approach (video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and laparoscopy). Surgical technique however is still a subject of debate and the level of evidence remains still low. Proving feasibility does not warrant a paradigm shift, as experience is an important factor for safety and patient benefit.

The aim of this study was to evaluate morbidity and mortality of open esophagectomy (OE) versus hybrid-MIE in a randomized controlled setting.

Prior to surgery patients will be randomized either the minimally invasive surgery group (laparoscopic gastric tube formation and thoracotomy) or the the open surgery group (open gastric tube formation with an open laparotomy approach). Randomizing tool is the "randomizer" of the medical university of vienna. (link is attached below)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and the esophagogastric junction in (Siewert) type I and II position
  • esophageal squamous cell cancer
  • patients, who require esophageal resection due to above mentioned diagnosis
  • patients, who gave their informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • individuals who did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded from the study.
  • patients with tumor localization in the upper third of the esophagus and requiring cervical resection were excluded.
  • patients, presenting other than AC or ESCC or showed contraindication for laparoscopy (history of large abdominal surgery or signs of hostile abdomen)
  • patients with a history or presence of any other malignancy, except carcinoma in situ or basalioma

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: minimally invasive esophagectomy
minimally invasive (laparoscopic) gastric mobilisation and gastric tube formation.
In the MIE group the laparoscopic procedure was performed for gastric tube formation. The patient was placed in supine position with legs apart. The surgeon stands between the legs using a five-trocar technique. Laparoscopy will be followed by an anterolateral thoracotomy in the fourth intercostal space.
Active Comparator: open esophagectomy
open gastric mobilization and gastric tube formation
in the open group the gastric mobilization and gastric tube formation will be perfumed with an open surgical approach. Laparotomy will be performed, followed by an anterolateral thoracotomy in the fourth intercostal space.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days
anastomotic leakage, gastric conduit necrosis and/or pneumonia
30 days
mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ICU stay
Time Frame: 90 days
length of stay at the intensive care unit (ICU)
90 days
hospital stay
Time Frame: 90 days
length of stay at the hospital
90 days
overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
long term overall survival
5 years
relapse free survival
Time Frame: 5 years
long term relapse free survival
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 19, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2017

First Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 27, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 26, 2017

Last Verified

January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • AUT-MIOMIE-RCT

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Cancer

Clinical Trials on minimally invasive esophagectomy

3
Subscribe