- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03041519
Zero-fluoroscopic Ablation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Ablation for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias (ZFOVA)
January 31, 2017 updated by: Yan Wang, Tongji Hospital
Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled, Prospective Trial to Compare the Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of Zero-fluoroscopic Ablation Versus Conventional Fluoroscopic Ablation for the Treatment of Ventricular Arrhythmias.
This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopy approach using Ensite NavX as the only imaging modality with conventional fluoroscopic approach for the catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias; conventional fluoroscopic approach use fluoroscopy plus Ensite NavX or plus Carto as the imaging modality.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Catheter ablation is a well-established treatment to treat patients with a wide range of heart rhythm disturbances.
Fluoroscopy is a imaging modality routinely used for the ablation of arrhythmias.Due to the rising concern regarding the harmful effects of radiation exposure to both the patients and operation staffs; three-dimensional mapping systems, including CARTO and Ensite NavX, have been developed and implemented in electrophysiological procedure for the navigation of catheters inside the heart chambers.
Ensite NavX system can be used for zero-fluoroscopy approach for catheter ablation of arrhythmias.
This study is intended to compare the feasibility, safety and efficacy of a zero-fluoroscopy approach using Ensite NavX as the only imaging modality with conventional fluoroscopic approach for the catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias; conventional fluoroscopic approach use fluoroscopy plus Ensite NavX or plus Carto as the imaging modality.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
300
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430030
- Recruiting
- Tongji Hospital
-
Contact:
- Guangzhi Chen, PhD
- Phone Number: 86-27-83662842
- Email: chengz2003@163.com
-
Contact:
- Yan Wang, PhD
- Phone Number: +86-13697326307
- Email: newswangyan@126.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 90 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ventricular Tachycardia
- Ventricular Premature Complexes
Exclusion Criteria:
- Organic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular premature complexes
- Drug-induced ventricular tachycardia or ventricular premature complexes
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Zero-fluoroscopy ablation
Zero-fluoroscopy ablation will be performed under the guidance of Ensite NavX for mapping and ablation and fluoroscopy will not be used during the procedure.
|
Catheter ablation will be performed under the guidance of Ensite NavX and without fluoroscopy.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional fluoroscopy ablation
Conventional fluoroscopy ablation will be performed under fluoroscopic guidance plus Ensite NavX for mapping and ablation during the procedure.
|
Catheter ablation will be performed under the guidance of fluoroscopy pllus Ensite NavX.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Procedural success rates
Time Frame: 3 months
|
3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Total procedure time
Time Frame: during procedure
|
during procedure
|
|
Fluoroscopy time
Time Frame: during procedure
|
during procedure
|
|
Complications
Time Frame: 1 year
|
1 year
|
|
Immediate success rate
Time Frame: 10~30minutes
|
10~30minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Andrade JG, Rivard L, Macle L. The past, the present, and the future of cardiac arrhythmia ablation. Can J Cardiol. 2014 Dec;30(12 Suppl):S431-41. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.07.731. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
- Anselmino M, Sillano D, Casolati D, Ferraris F, Scaglione M, Gaita F. A new electrophysiology era: zero fluoroscopy. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2013 Mar;14(3):221-7. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e3283536555.
- Kozluk E, Gawrysiak M, Piatkowska A, Lodzinski P, Kiliszek M, Malkowska S, Zaczek R, Piatkowski R, Opolski G, Kozlowski D. Radiofrequency ablation without the use of fluoroscopy - in what kind of patients is it feasible? Arch Med Sci. 2013 Oct 31;9(5):821-5. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2013.38676. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
October 1, 2011
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
July 1, 2017
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
December 1, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 29, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 31, 2017
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
February 2, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
February 2, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 31, 2017
Last Verified
January 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TJHXXG-ZF-VT-20161220
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.