Materiovigilance After Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse Surgery (VIGI-MESH)

September 19, 2023 updated by: Poitiers University Hospital

Observatory of Materiovigilance After Surgery of Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse in Women.

Observatory of Materiovigilance After Surgery of Urinary Incontinence or Prolapse in Women Implantable medical devices (meshes) used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (genital prolapse, rectal prolapse), or incontinence surgery may be source of severe complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

RATIONAL Implantable medical devices (meshes) used in pelvic organ prolapse surgery (genital prolapse, rectal prolapse), or incontinence surgery may be source of severe complications.

MAIN OBJECTIVE Estimate the incidence of severe complications during or after surgery of urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse in adult women depending on the type of surgery performed.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES Estimate the incidence of severe complications after urinary incontinence or prolapse surgery as a function of time since surgery.

Compare the incidence rates of severe complications considering the type of procedure (with or without mesh, vaginal or laparoscopic, etc.), comorbidities, mesh type, surgeon experience, and surgical volume centre.

Report the health and satisfaction of operated women. Estimate the risk of revision surgery for failure or recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME Per- and post-operative complications (less than 12 months after surgery), or late (after 12 months) severe (grade III or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo classification)

OTHER OUTCOMES Time lapse of occurrence of severe complications Surgical recovery for failure or recurrence Health and perceived improvement (OMS, EQ5D, an PGI-I questionnaires)

DESIGN Prospective multicentre cohort allowing the constitution and analysis of an observatory off surgery for genital prolapse, rectal prolapse and urinary stress incontinence in women.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  • Operated for urinary incontinence, genital prolapse, or rectal prolapse in one of the centres participating in the observatory
  • 18 years old or more.

SUBJECTS NUMBER Estimated at 3000 per year during 5 years in 18 participating centres

STUDY LENGTH Duration of the inclusion period: 2 years with the initial grant from ANSM (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des produits de santé, French Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency), after new funding by ANSM 5 years of inclusion in total.

Duration of participation of subjects: 2 years with grant from ANSM, after the new funding by ANSM 10 years.

Total duration of the study: 3 years with the grant from ANSM, 15 years with the new funding.

ANALYSIS PLANNED The one-year analysis will be based on multivariate logistic regression analysis (considering confounding factors). The 10-year (or intermediate-term) analysis will use survival analysis methods to account for delays in complications: Kaplan-Meier curves; Model of Cox proportional hazards.

PERSPECTIVES The observatory should make it possible to precise the tolerance and the short- and long-term consequences of the use of these implantable devices (meshes) in pelvic organ prolapse or incontinence surgery in women and to specify the risk factors for severe complications.

The observatory will enable to make comparisons between the different types of meshes and different surgical procedures, and to identify those that may present problems.

Clinical practice recommendations may be issued as well as standards for marketing.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

19000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aix-en-Provence, France, 13090
        • Centre l'Avancée - Clinique Axium
      • Angers, France, 49900
        • C.H.U. d'Angers
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • CHRU De Besancon
      • Bordeaux, France, 33200
        • CHU de Bordeaux
      • Béthune, France, 62400
        • Centre Hospitalier de Béthune
      • Caen, France, 14033
        • CHU caen
      • Châtellerault, France, 86106
        • Centre Hospitalier Camille Guérin
      • Clamart, France, 92140
        • Hôpital Antoine-Béclère
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 630003
        • CHU Estaing
      • Dunkerque, France, 59240
        • Centre Hospitalier de Dunkerque
      • Hénin-Beaumont, France, 62800
        • Polyclinique d'Hénin-Beaumont
      • La Rochelle, France, 17000
        • Hopital La Rochelle- Ré- Aunis
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Chu Lille
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Hôpital St Vincent de Paul
      • Limoges, France, 87000
        • CHU de Limoges
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Montpellier, France, 34070
        • Clinique Beausoleil
      • Nancy, France, 54511
        • CHRU de NANCY
      • Nantes, France, 44000
        • CHU Nantes
      • Nîmes, France, 30029
        • CHRU Caremeau
      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Hôpital Bichat
      • Paris, France
        • Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • La Pitié-Salpétrière
      • Plérin, France, 21900
        • Centre briochin d'Urologie
      • Poissy, France, 78300
        • CHI Poissy-St-Germain
      • Poitiers, France, 86000
        • CHU De Poitiers
      • Reims, France, 51000
        • CHU de Reims
      • Strasbourg, France, 37200
        • CHU Strasbourg
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Hopital Foch
      • Toulon, France, 83000
        • Clinique UROVAR
      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • CHU de Toulouse

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women operated for urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or rectal prolapse in one of the centres participating in the observatory, aged 18 years old or more.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Operated for urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, or rectal prolapse in one of the centres participating in the observatory
  • 18 years old or more.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of severe complications
Time Frame: 10 years
Grade III or more according to Clavien-Dindo classification
10 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time lapse of occurrence of severe complications
Time Frame: 10 years
10 years
Surgical recovery for failure or recurrence
Time Frame: 10 years
Number participent with new revision surgery for failure Number participent with new revision surgery for recurrence
10 years
Health and perceived improvement
Time Frame: 10 years
Scale OMS/ ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Groupone covers six values, from 0 to 5, where 0 represents a good state of health and 5 the death.
10 years
Health and perceived improvement
Time Frame: 10 years

EQ5D is a standardised measure of health status developed

Each of the 5 dimensions comprising the EQ-5D descriptive system is divided into 5 levels of perceived problems :

  • Level 1 : indicating no problem
  • Level 2 : indicating slight problems
  • Level 3 : indicating moderate problems
  • Level 4 : indicating severe problems
  • Level 5 : indicating extreme problems
10 years
Health and perceived improvement
Time Frame: 10 years
PGI-I, Patient Global Impression of Improvement, is a transition scale that is a single question asking the patient to rate their urinary tract condition now, as compared with how it was prior to before beginning treatment on a scale from 1. Very much better to 7. Very much worse.
10 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xavier FRITEL, PhD, MD, Poitiers University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2033

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2033

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Clinical Trials on urinary incontinence, pelvic organ or rectal prolapse surgery

Subscribe