Urinary Incontinence and Anxiety in Pregnancy

June 21, 2021 updated by: Esin Merve Erol Koç

The Impact of Urinary Incontinence on Anxiety Status in Pregnancy Period: A Prospective Case-control Study

This prospective case-control study aimed to evaluate the impact of presence, and severity of urinary incontinence (UI) on pregnancy related anxiety. The study included 160 pregnant women with uncomplicated pregnancies at the second trimester. The pregnant women with UI (n=80) were compared to the control group including continent pregnant women (n=80) in terms of Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Scores (PRAQ-R2) and Incontinence Consultation Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) in pregnant women. Pelvic Organ Prolapse Questionnaire (POP-Q) was considered for the diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapsus. The UI was also divided into subgroups as stress (SUI), urge (UUI), and mixed (MUI) types and they were also compared to the control group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the impact of the presence and the severity of UI on pregnancy related anxiety status in a well-defined pregnant cohort. The correlations were also analyzed in terms of the UI subtypes as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), urge urinary incontinence (UUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). A total of 160 pregnant women applied to outpatient clinics of Obstetrics and Urology Departments were included in the current study. Patients were compared in two groups in terms of Study group including pregnant women who were diagnosed with the UI (n=80) and Control group including healthy pregnant women (n=80). The study was approved by the institutional review board of Ankara Training and Research Hospital (# 0067/2019). All the participants were informed, and written consent was obtained before the participated the study.

Physical examination was performed to diagnose the pelvic organ prolapse and the findings were classified through the five categories based on Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q). According to POP-Q, only the pregnant women diagnosed with category 0 or category 1 were included in the study. All the pregnant women included in the current study were married and multiparous women, at the second trimester of the pregnancy, with uncomplicated pregnancies and regular pregnancy follow-up. Pregnancies complicated by chronic maternal diseases (rheumatological diseases, renal failure, vascular malformations, hypertension, cardiac disease, diabetes mellitus, obesity, hypo-hyperthyroidy, congenital hematological disorders), acute inflammatory conditions (acute pancreatitis, acute appendicitis), pregnancy complications (gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes), history of alcohol consumption, having multiple pregnancies, psychiatric diseases, cognitive disorders, neurogenic bladder, fecal incontinence, chronic constipation, chronic cough, urinary infection, history of pelvic surgery including incontinence surgeries and/or taking medication for UI were excluded from the current study. Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised (PRAQ-R2) scale was used to evaluate the anxiety status of the participants. The International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire - Short Form (ICIQ-SF) which has been defined by Hajebrahimi et al. as a reliable scale, and validated in Turkish by Demircan et al. was used for the evaluation of UI. This scale includes questions about the frequency of UI, the conditions at which UI occurs and how much it affects the social life of the person. UI subtypes were diagnosed according to the definitions of the International Continence Society.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey, 06800
        • Esin Merve Erol Koç

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 38 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Study group: The pregnant women who were diagnosed with the urinary incontinence (n=80) with category 0 or category 1 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) score in physical examination.

Control group: Consisted of healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies (n=80). They had no complaint of urinary incontinence and their gynecological examination did not reveal any finding of pelvic organ prolapse.

The pregnant women included both in the Study and Control group were married and multiparous women, at the second trimester of the pregnancy, with uncomplicated pregnancies and regular pregnancy follow-up.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The pregnant women who were diagnosed with the urinary incontinence (n=80) with category 0 or category 1 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) score in physical examination.

Healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies (n=80) with no complaint or finding of urinary incontinence.

Married and multiparous women, at the second trimester of the pregnancy, with uncomplicated pregnancies and regular pregnancy follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnancies complicated by chronic maternal diseases, acute inflammatory conditions, pregnancy complications, history of alcohol consumption, having multiple pregnancies, psychiatric diseases, cognitive disorders, neurogenic bladder, fecal incontinence, chronic constipation, chronic cough, urinary infection, history of pelvic surgery including incontinence surgeries and/or taking medication for urinary incontinence were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pregnant women with the diagnosis of urinary incontinence (Study group)
The pregnant women who were diagnosed with the urinary incontinence (n=80) with category 0 or category 1 Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) score in physical examination.
Gynecological examination was performed to the whole pregnant cohort included in the study to diagnose either the pelvic organ prolapse according to the POP-Q system or to be sure that they have no findings of pelvic organ prolapse.
Gynecological examination was performed to the whole pregnant cohort included in the study to diagnose either the pelvic organ prolapse according to the POP-Q system or to be sure that they have no findings of pelvic organ prolapse.
ICIQ-SF questionnaire was applied to the Study group to determine the severity of urinary incontinence.
PRAQ-R2 questionnaire was applied to the whole pregnant cohort included in the study to determine their anxiety status.
Healthy pregnant women (Control group)
Control group consisted of healthy women with uncomplicated pregnancies (n=80). They had no complaint of urinary incontinence and their gynecological examination did not reveal any finding of pelvic organ prolapse.
Gynecological examination was performed to the whole pregnant cohort included in the study to diagnose either the pelvic organ prolapse according to the POP-Q system or to be sure that they have no findings of pelvic organ prolapse.
PRAQ-R2 questionnaire was applied to the whole pregnant cohort included in the study to determine their anxiety status.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q)
Time Frame: 10 minutes
graded between 0-4.
10 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pregnancy-Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised 2 (PRAQ-R2)
Time Frame: 20 minutes
scored between 10-50 points.
20 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incontinence Consultation Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF)
Time Frame: 20 minutes
scored between 1-21 points.
20 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Esin Merve Erol Koç, MD, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 2, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

June 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available if needed by the review board.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Gynecological examination

3
Subscribe