Burst Biologics Spinal Fusion Registry

December 27, 2019 updated by: Burst Biologics

Multicenter Prospective Registry to Evaluate Use and Outcomes of Burst Biologics Products in Spinal Fusion Surgery

A multicenter patient registry was created with aim of documenting how spine and neurosurgeons are utilizing Burst Biologics products along with patient outcomes. These include radiographic measures such as fusion outcome, instrumentation integrity, and clinical outcomes (symptom and function improvement) based on surgeon and patient based outcome assessments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Spinal fusion surgery remains the most common intervention despite the increasing prevalence of various motion preservation and alternative stabilization devices for patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatment and experience back and/or leg pain and decreased function/quality of life. Donor site morbidity and availability limit the use of autogenous bone and over the past two decades' surgeon interest in alternative bone grafts has steadily increased. Bone morphogenic proteins, synthetic bone graft substitutes, and various allograft products are widely available to surgeons. Limitations on the use of allografts in the past were mainly attributed to less than optimal donor screening and processing techniques which removed viable components needed to aid in the bone healing process.

In recent years, the focus and scientific advances in various allograft processing techniques have allowed the retention of various viable cytokines, growth factors, and cell populations which result in enhanced osteogenic and osteoinductive properties. Rigorous donor bone screening and meticulous testing has virtually eliminated the risk of disease transmission.

A unique proprietary cryoprotection processing technique for allograft tissue was developed by Smart-Surgical, Inc. and a complete line of allograft products was created and is now marketed by Burst Biologics (dba). In addition, rigorous standardized laboratory assay techniques and statistical analysis provide consistency and uniformity of the biologically active components of Burst allograft products.

This prospective registry was designed as an observational study to ascertain how commercially available Burst Products are being used by surgeons performing spinal fusion as well as determining relevant patient outcomes.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Carrollton, Georgia, United States, 30117
        • Recruiting
        • Carrollton Orthopaedic Clinic
        • Contact:
          • Brad G Prybis, MD
    • Kentucky
      • Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42001
        • Recruiting
        • Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky
        • Contact:
          • K. Brandon Strenge, MD
    • Maryland
      • Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20817
        • Recruiting
        • OrthoBethesda
        • Contact:
          • Joseph O'Brien, MD
    • North Carolina
      • Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27518
        • Recruiting
        • Cary Orthopedics
        • Contact:
          • Sameer Mathur, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients in the study will be drawn from the individual surgeons practice. Patients will be either candidates for spinal fusion surgery after having failed conservative treatment or will have had spinal fusion surgery and the surgeon determined that the use of a Burst Biologic product is or was clinically indicated.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient aged 18 years or older
  • Patient diagnosed with a degenerative spine disorder, has failed conservative treatment, and has decided to undergo surgery.
  • The surgeon has determined that a Burst Biologic product is or was clinically indicated.
  • Patient capable of understanding the content of the Informed Consent Form
  • Patient willing and able to participate in the registry protocol including follow-up visits and clinical evaluations.
  • Patient who has agreed to participate in the registry by providing consent according to the applicable local law and the declaration of Helsinki.

Exclusion Criteria:

The following are relative contraindications for the use of Burst Products, however the investigator surgeon is solely responsible for the determination of patient eligibility for surgery:

  • Severe vascular or neurological disease
  • Uncontrolled diabetes
  • Severe degenerative disease (other than degenerative disc disease)
  • Hypercalcemia, abnormal calcium metabolism
  • Existing acute or chronic infections, especially at the site of the operation
  • Inflammatory bone disease such as osteomyelitis
  • Malignant tumors
  • Patients who are or plan to become pregnant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
BioBurst Fluid, Burst Allograft
Spinal Fusion with BioBurst Fluid or Burst Allograft
BioBurst Fluid or Burst Allograft used to augment spinal fusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fusion Rate (%) . Number of patients fused/all patients operated (%)
Time Frame: 12 Months
Determined by CT Scan or Plain Radiographs
12 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 Months
12 Months
Change from Baseline in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Change from Baseline in Short Form-12
Time Frame: 12 Months
SF12 Score
12 Months
Change from Baseline in Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Time Frame: 12 Months
NDI Score
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Steven M Czop, R.Ph., Medical Affairs Officer

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

March 24, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 24, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 27, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease

Clinical Trials on BioBurst Fluid, Burst Allograft

Subscribe