Pancreatitis CytoSorbents (CytoSorb®) Inflammatory Cytokine Removal (PACIFIC)

March 10, 2017 updated by: Wolfgang Huber, Technical University of Munich

Pancreatitis CytoSorbents (CytoSorb®) Inflammatory Cytokine Removal: A Prospective Study.

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) has a mortality of up to 42%. The outcome of SAP is related to the development of SIRS and consecutive organ failures. Due to the lack of a causative therapy except the removal of bile duct stones, therapy is predominantly symptomatic.

With regard to a marked inflammatory response ("cytokine storm") during the early phase of SAP extracorporeal cytokine removal is a promising therapeutic approach.

This prospective case control study investigates the impact of early extracorporeal cytokine adsorption with the CytoSorb®-device on haemodynamics (primary endpoint) and several secondary outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) has a mortality of up to 42%. The outcome of SAP is related to the development of SIRS and consecutive organ failures. Due to the lack of a causative therapy except the removal of bile duct stones, therapy is predominantly symptomatic.

Severity and mortality are associated to an early systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and to septic complications at a later stage of disease.

With regard to a marked inflammatory response ("cytokine storm") during the early phase of SAP extracorporeal cytokine removal is a promising therapeutic approach.

This prospective case control study investigates the impact of early extracorporeal cytokine adsorption with the CytoSorb® device on haemodynamics (primary endpoint) and several secondary outcomes.

Patients with high probability of SAP (APACHE-II-score ≥10) are eligible for 7 days after the onset of pain.

The patients will be treated for 48h with two consecutive 24h sessions of cytokine absorption with the CytoSorb®-device.

All patients will be under haemodynamic Monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution The primary endpoint is defined as an improvement of the vasopressor dependency index of ≥20% (if no vasoactive drugs are used at baseline, the cardiac power index cardiac power index (CPI) will be used as primary endpoint).

The outcome analysis will be based on comparison of the incidence of the primary endpoint in 30 Intervention patients compared to 60 matched controls.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Proven acute pancreatitis:

    • typical pain
    • at least 3-fold increase in serum lipase
    • onset of pain within 7 days before inclusion AND
  • APACHE-II ≥10 AND
  • ≥1 criterion of "severe sepsis" AND
  • Haemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution AND
  • ≥ 1 marker of poor prognosis of acute pancreatitis:

    • Haematocrit > 44% (men), >40% (women)
    • Blood glucose > 125 mg/dL
    • C-reactive protein (CRP) > 10mg/dL
    • Computed tomography score category C-E
    • Age >55 years
    • Leukocytes >16 G/L
    • Glutamate oxaloacetate transferase (GOT) >250 U/L
    • Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) >350 U/L
    • Calcium <2,0mmol/L

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • lack of informed consent of patient or representative
  • pre-existing disease with life expectancy <3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: CytoSorb
CytoSorb therapy for 48h
Two consecutive 24h treatments with the CytoSorb-device
NO_INTERVENTION: Matched controls
60 matched controls with SAP and transpulmonary thermodilution monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Haemodynamics
Time Frame: Within 48h after the onset of CytoSorb treatment
Improvement of the vasopressor dependency index >=20%. (Improvement of cardiac power index >=20% in case of no vasopressor use at baseline)
Within 48h after the onset of CytoSorb treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality-1
Time Frame: 28 days from inclusion into the study
28-days-mortality
28 days from inclusion into the study
Mortality-2
Time Frame: From admission to the ICU until discharge or transfer from the ICU (up to one year)
ICU-mortality
From admission to the ICU until discharge or transfer from the ICU (up to one year)
Mortality-3
Time Frame: From admission to discharge from the hospital (up to one year)
Hospital-mortality
From admission to discharge from the hospital (up to one year)
Inflammation
Time Frame: Within 48h after the onset of CytoSorb treatment
IL-6, CRP and PCT-values levels compared to before CytoSorb treatment
Within 48h after the onset of CytoSorb treatment
Respiratory outcome
Time Frame: Within 28 days after the onset of CytoSorb treatment
Ventilator-free days
Within 28 days after the onset of CytoSorb treatment
Renal function and its Change over time
Time Frame: Within 28 days after the onset of CytoSorb treatment
Daily classification according to KDIGO; comparison vs. before Cyto Sorb treatment
Within 28 days after the onset of CytoSorb treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wolfgang Huber, Professor, II. Medizinische Klinik; Klinikum rechts der Isar; Technische Universität München

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

March 15, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2018

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

July 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

March 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

March 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on SIRS

Clinical Trials on CytoSorb

Subscribe