Performance Evaluation of the Nanomix eLab® CRP, PCT, and LAC Assays With the Nanomix eLab System

August 20, 2021 updated by: Nanomix

A Performance Evaluation of the Nanomix eLab® C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Lactate Assays With the Nanomix eLab System

The performance of the eLab C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Lactate Assays will be demonstrated during a method comparison study in which venous whole blood and plasma samples are used. eLab results will be compared to an FDA cleared predicate device. Demographic information will be collected for the subject. Venous blood will be collected in 2 Li-heparinized tubes (2-4ml per tube). One tube will be used for testing at the site and the second tube will be processed to plasma for storage and subsequent shipment to a designated testing site. Whole blood samples will be tested on the eLab C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Lactate test as soon as possible after collection; testing on whole blood must be completed within 30 minutes of collection. A predicate Lactate test will also be run as soon as possible after collection; testing of WB on the predicate must be completed within 30 minutes of collection. Plasma will be separated from the whole blood via centrifugation within 30 minutes of collection and tested on the eLab C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Lactate Assays and started on predicate CRP and PCT devices (If available at the site) within 30 minutes of the eLab whole blood test. The remainder of the plasma specimen and plasma from the second collection tube will be frozen within one hour of collection, then stored at approximately -20 degrees C or colder.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

184

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94110
        • UCSF- San Francisco General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Volunteers from medical wards presenting with acute illness, observation of infection and meeting SIRS criteria.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be 18 years of age or older
  • Must have provided written informed consent
  • Admitted to ICU, Emergency Department or other medical wards for acute illness and observation of infection and meeting SIRS criteria (such as elevated heart rate, tachypnea, hypotension, fever, hypothermia, or elevated respiratory rate)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing
  • Admitted to ICU after trauma
  • Admitted to ICU after surgery
  • Cardiogenic shock

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Estimates of bias relative to an FDA cleared predicate device using CLSI EP9-A3 as a guideline.
Time Frame: One timepoint at enrollment
An analysis of the results from 150-200 subjects collected across the three (3) sites will be performed to accomplish the analytical comparison endpoints. If the analysis requires more samples to cover the assay range, then, the study may be continued and more subjects enrolled. A minimum of 25 percent of the samples must have values near the clinical significant concentration. In order to meet this requirement up to 10 % of samples may be spiked. Clinical significant concentrations for CRP are defined as values greater than 10 mg/L; PCT values greater than 0.5 ng/mL and LAC values greater than 2 mmol/L.
One timepoint at enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: Tina Landess, Nanomix

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 11, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

August 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 12, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2021

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Nanomix-010s

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Nanomix eLab® System molecular diagnostic test (non-interventional)

3
Subscribe