Adjunctive Corticosteroids for Tuberculous Meningitis in HIV-infected Adults (The ACT HIV Trial)

A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial of Adjunctive Dexamethasone for the Treatment of HIV-infected Adults With Tuberculous Meningitis

The investigators will conduct a randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial of adjunctive dexamethasone in the initial (6-8 weeks) treatment of tuberculous meningitis in Vietnamese adults. The trial will address a primary hypothesis in all enrolled patients, and a secondary hypothesis in a sub-group of enrolled patients who develop anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury (DILI). The primary hypothesis is adjunctive dexamethasone increases survival from TBM in HIV co-infected adults. The secondary hypothesis is current guidelines for the management of anti-tuberculosis drug-induced liver injury in those with TBM result in the premature interruption of rifampicin and isoniazid (the critical active drugs in early therapy) and are thereby placing participants at risk of poor outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mycobacterium tuberculosis causes ~9 million new cases of tuberculosis and ~1.5 million deaths annually, around 0.4 million of whom are co-infected with HIV. Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most severe form of tuberculosis, killing around 30% of all sufferers despite appropriate anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy. It is especially common in young children, and in those infected with HIV.

There is a longstanding hypothesis that death from TBM results from an excessive intracerebral inflammatory response. The corollary of this hypothesis has been that adjunctive anti-inflammatory treatment with corticosteroids (e.g. dexamethasone) improves survival, which has been demonstrated in predominantly HIV-uninfected individuals in a small number of trials. Yet how corticosteroids improve survival, and whether they do so in HIV-infected patients, remains uncertain. The primary objective of this trial is to determine whether or not adjunctive corticosteroids reduce deaths from TBM in HIV-infected adults.

Adjunctive dexamethasone might improve outcomes from HIV-associated TBM by diverse mechanisms. First, it may control the early intracerebral inflammatory response, reducing cerebral oedema and intra-cranial pressure. Second, it may prevent the potentially life-threatening complications of hydrocephalus, infarction and tuberculoma formation. Third, it may prevent the incidence of anti-retroviral (ARV) treatment-associated neurological immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS). Finally, dexamethasone may help reduce the risk of drug-induced liver injury and thereby improve outcome by enabling uninterrupted anti-tuberculosis treatment.

The current evidence-base for using adjunctive corticosteroids for the treatment of HIV-associated TBM is restricted to 98 adults recruited to a trial in Vietnam published in 2004. This trial randomized a total of 545 subjects (98 of them HIV-positive) and reported an overall reduction in 9-month mortality due to dexamethasone from 41.3% (112/271) to 31.8% (87/274) (hazard ratio of time to death 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.92, P=0.01). While there was no clear evidence of treatment effect heterogeneity according to HIV status, the number of included HIV-infected subjects was low and the observed benefit in that subgroup was smaller: 61.4% (27/44) in the dexamethasone group died, compared to 68.5% (37/54) in the placebo group (hazard ratio of time to death 0.86; 95% CI 0.52-1.41; P=0.55).

There are limited data from HIV-infected patients with TBM treated with dexamethasone, but findings from studies using corticosteroids in HIV-infected individuals with other forms of tuberculosis and other opportunistic infections suggest corticosteroids may cause harm in those with advanced HIV infection. There is evidence that corticosteroids may increase the risk of HIV-associated malignancies, especially Kaposi sarcoma. Furthermore, a recent trial of adjunctive dexamethasone for HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis performed in Southeast Asia and Africa found dexamethasone was associated with worse outcomes, with increased risk of secondary infections, hyperglycaemia and electrolyte abnormalities, and disability.

On the basis of these limited data most international guidelines cautiously recommend dexamethasone should be given for HIV-associated TBM, but all acknowledge the paucity of evidence and the need for additional controlled trial data. Our trial will meet the need for more data and aims to provide definitive evidence as to the risk/benefit of adjunctive dexamethasone in the treatment of this important and very severe disease.

Our secondary objective is to investigate alternative management strategies in a subset of patients who develop drug-induced liver injury that will enable the safe continuation of rifampicin and isoniazid therapy whenever possible. The investigators will perform an open, randomised comparison of three management strategies with the aim of demonstrating which strategy results in the least interruption in R and H treatment. All patients enrolled in the trial will be eligible to take part in this study, with the exception of those known to have TBM caused by isoniazid resistant or MDR M. tuberculosis. Consent will be sought at enrolment, with an option given to patients to enrol in the main study, but not the 'drug-induced liver injury strategy study'.

Eligible patients will be randomised to one of three strategies:

  1. Observe: measure transaminases, bilirubin, and INR every 3 days; do not change/stop anti-tuberculosis drugs unless transaminases rise to ≥10x normal, or total bilirubin rises >2.0mg/dl (>34 µmol/L), or INR >1.5 or symptoms of hepatitis worsen (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain), in which case go to Strategy 3.
  2. Stop Pyrazinamide (Z) alone. Observe, measuring transaminases, bilirubin, and INR every 3 days. If transaminases do not fall to < 5x ULN by day 5, or total bilirubin rises >2.0mg/dl (>34 µmol/L), or INR >1.5 or symptoms of hepatitis worsen at any time (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain), go to Strategy 3.
  3. Current standard of care (the current USA CDC guidelines): stop rifampicin (R), isoniazid (H) and Z immediately and add levofloxacin and an aminoglycoside to ethambutol. Restart R (at full dose) once transaminases are <2X ULN and no hepatitis symptoms. If no increase in transaminases after 7 days add isoniazid (at full dose) and stop levofloxacin and aminoglycoside. If transaminases remain normal on full dose R and H, Z was the likely cause and it should not be re-started and treatment duration should be extended to ≥12 months. If transaminases rise ≥ 5x ULN, or ≥3x ULN with symptoms, at any time after re-introduction of R and/or H the physician should stop R and/or H (depending on which was associated with the transaminase rise). If neither R or H can be used, treat with levofloxacin, an aminoglycoside and ethambutol. If R can be used, but not H, treat with R, levofloxacin and ethambutol. If H can be used, but not R, treat with H, levofloxacin and ethambutol.

The primary endpoint is the proportion of time in the 60 days following randomisation during which neither rifampicin nor isoniazid are given (or the subject is dead). For example, if RH is interrupted for 18 days and the participant dies 48 days after randomization, the endpoint will be 50% [(18+(60-48))/60]. Rifampicin and isoniazid are considered critical drugs in early TBM treatment; inability to use these agents (either through bacterial resistance or patient intolerance) is associated with poor outcome. The vast majority of interruptions are expected to be shorter than one month for strategy 3 (standard of care) but as management strategies 1 and 2 delay the time point of the interruption, a longer cut-off of 60 days was chosen.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

520

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Jakarta, Indonesia
        • Cipto Mangunkusumo hospital
      • Jakarta, Indonesia
        • Eijkman-Oxford Clinical Research Unit
      • Jakarta, Indonesia
        • RSUP Persahabatan Hospital
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
        • Hospital For Tropical Diseases
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
        • Oxford University Clinical Research Unit
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
        • Pham Ngoc Thach Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (18 years or older)
  • HIV-infected
  • Clinical diagnosis of TBM (≥5 days of meningitis symptoms, and CSF abnormalities) and anti-tuberculosis chemotherapy either planned or started by the attending physician

Note: Published diagnostic criteria will be applied to all enrolled participants at the end of the study when all mycobacterial culture results are available. The criteria will sub-divide all cases into definite, probable and possible TBM, and those with an alternative diagnosis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • An additional brain infection (other than TBM) confirmed or suspected: positive CSF Gram or India Ink stain; positive blood or CSF Cryptococcal antigen test; cerebral toxoplasmosis suspected and attending physician wants to give anti-toxoplasmosis treatment with anti-tuberculosis treatment
  • More than 6 consecutive days of two or more drugs active against M. tuberculosis immediately before screening
  • More than 3 consecutive days of any type of orally or intravenously administered corticosteroid immediately before randomisation
  • Dexamethasone considered mandatory for any reason by the attending physician
  • Dexamethasone considered to be contraindicated for any reason by the attending physician
  • Previously been randomised into the trial for a prior episode of TBM
  • Lack of consent from the participant or family member (if the participant is incapacitated by the disease)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Dexamethasone
standard anti-tuberculosis drugs plus dexamethasone for 6-8 weeks
Active treatment with dexamethasone from randomisation (IV followed by oral according to disease severity at the start of treatment): dexamethasone for intravenous injection and dexamethasone for oral ingestion
Placebo Comparator: Identical placebo
standard anti-tuberculosis drugs plus placebo for 6-8 weeks

Treatment with matched placebo:

Standard saline for intravenous injection and placebo oral tablets containing cellulose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival until 12 months after randomisation
Time Frame: 12 months from randomisation
The primary endpoint is overall survival, i.e. the time from randomization to death, during a follow-up period of 12 months. Survivors known to be alive at 12 months will be censored at that time-point and subjects who withdrew or were lost to follow-up before 12 months will be censored at the date they were last known to be alive.
12 months from randomisation

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neurological disability at 12 months (modified Rankin score)
Time Frame: at 12 months

Neurological disability will be assessed by the modified Rankin score (see below) on months 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and 24 from randomisation. The main endpoint is the 12 month assessment and subjects who died before 12 months will be treated as having a score of 6 ('Dead').

The Modified Rankin Scale Score Description 0 No symptoms

  1. Minor symptoms not interfering with lifestyle
  2. Symptoms that lead to some restriction in lifestyle, but do not interfere with the patients ability to look after themselves
  3. Symptoms that restrict lifestyle and prevent totally independent living
  4. Symptoms that clearly prevent independent living, although the patient does not need constant care and attention.
  5. Totally dependent, requiring constant help day and night.
  6. Death
at 12 months
Time to new neurological event (defined as a fall in GCS of ≥2 points for ≥48 hours, new focal neurological sign, or new onset of seizures) or death by 12 months
Time Frame: by 12 months
A neurological event is defined as a fall in Glasgow coma score by ≥2 points for ≥2 days from the highest previously recorded Glasgow coma score (including baseline) or the onset of any of the following clinical adverse events: cerebellar symptoms, focal neurological signs, or onset of seizures.
by 12 months
Rate of neurological IRIS events up to 6 months from randomisation
Time Frame: 6 months from randomisation
The rate is defined as the number of IRIS events divided by the observed person-time of follow-up in each treatment group.
6 months from randomisation
Time to new AIDS-defining illness or death by 12 months
Time Frame: by 12 months
AIDS-defining illnesses will be defined as per the WHO classification.
by 12 months
Serious adverse events by 12 months
Time Frame: by 12 months
Comparison of the frequency of serious adverse events between treatment groups will form an important part of the study analysis.
by 12 months
HIV-associated malignancy by 12 months
Time Frame: by 12 months
The three major HIV-associated malignancies are Kaposi sarcoma, high grade B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and invasive cervical cancer.
by 12 months
Overall survival
Time Frame: by 24 months
The main analysis of this trial will be performed at the time point where all randomized subjects have completed 12 months of follow-up. However, all participants will continue to be followed up for 24 months and overall survival will be reported once 24 month follow-up has been completed for all participants.
by 24 months
Neurological disability
Time Frame: by 24 months
The main analysis of this trial will be performed at the time point where all randomized subjects have completed 12 months of follow-up. However, all participants will continue to be followed up for 24 months and neurological disability will be reported once 24 month follow-up has been completed for all participants.
by 24 months
Time to new AIDS defining event or death
Time Frame: by 24 months
The main analysis of this trial will be performed at the time point where all randomized subjects have completed 12 months of follow-up. However, all participants will continue to be followed up for 24 months and this outcome will be reported once 24 month follow-up has been completed for all participants.
by 24 months
Rate of HIV-related malignancy
Time Frame: by 24 months
The main analysis of this trial will be performed at the time point where all randomized subjects have completed 12 months of follow-up. However, all participants will continue to be followed up for 24 months and this outcome will be reported once 24 month follow-up has been completed for all participants.
by 24 months
Recurrence of TBM within 24 months of follow-up
Time Frame: 24 months
This outcome will be reported once 24 month follow-up has been completed for all participants.
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

April 26, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

March 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Oxford University Clinical Research Unit recognizes the ethical obligation to ensure that optimal use is made of the data and specimens that the investigators collect for our research and the value of sharing individual level data. The investigators aim to ensure that data generated from all our research are collected, curated, managed and shared in a way that maximizes their benefit. When sharing data the investigators have an obligation to ensure that the interests of research participants, researchers and other stakeholders are appropriately protected. The Oxford University Clinical Research Unit data sharing policy and the data request form outline the default procedures for data sharing.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on Dexamethasone

Subscribe