Effect of Cannabis and Endocannabinoids on HIV Neuropathic Pain

May 24, 2024 updated by: Brook Henry, University of California, San Diego

Effect of Cannabis Administration and Endocannabinoids on HIV Neuropathic Pain Primary Study - Phase 2

Acute cannabis administration is reported to alleviate HIV neuropathic pain (HIV-NP), but there is limited knowledge about the effects of cannabis constituents (delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol/THC and cannabidiol/CBD), the consequences of long-term cannabis use, and the impact of cannabis on endocannabinoid (EC) function in people living with HIV- NP. Our objective is to address these three fundamental gaps in our knowledge by: 1) examining the acute effects of various CBD/THC products on HIV-NP, 2) utilizing a mHealth text messaging protocol, Individual Monitoring of Pain and Cannabis Taken (IMPACT) to monitor daily real-world cannabis use and changes in pain; and 3) studying the relationship between cannabinoids, EC biomarkers, and chronic neuropathic pain

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Our objective is to assess 120 community-dwelling people living with HIV who have neuropathic pain and are currently using cannabis. These participants will be enrolled in a study that consists of two phases:

Phase 1) This will involve a cross over study involving three different doses of vaporized cannabis that contain THC and varying concentrations of CBD:

  • Low CBD session: 8 puffs of 1.9% THC + 0.01% CBD
  • Medium CBD sessions: 4 puffs of 1.4% THC + 0.01% CBD plus 4 puffs of 1.4% THC + 5.1% CBD
  • High CBD sessions: 8 puffs of 1.4% THC + 5.1% CBD

This phase will examine the acute effects of cannabis on pain intensity, blood endocannabinoid levels, and the relationship of pain with heart rate variability (HRV).

Phase 2) This phase will involve the association between dispensary-obtained cannabis and changes in pain reported via IMPACT, a mHealth text messaging program that will serve as a useful tool to monitor the relationship between pain and cannabis use. Text messaging is an effective method to modify health behaviors, monitor substance use, and track pain. Our group has recently demonstrated the feasibility of using short message service (SMS) texting to promote anti-retroviral therapy adherence and monitor daily methamphetamine (METH) use in persons living with HIV neuropathy with bipolar disorder or METH dependence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103
        • UC Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, UC San Diego

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. the ability to provide informed consent
  2. age 18 or older
  3. HIV infection documented at the HNRP or assessed by an HIV test at screening;
  4. a diagnosis of HIV sensory neuropathy
  5. current use of cannabis
  6. the ability to describe the THC and CBD content in the products they use, i.e., obtaining cannabis from dispensaries that list THC and CBD content
  7. ability to respond to daily text message

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. meeting criteria for current substance or alcohol dependence
  2. traumatic brain injury
  3. dementia or Alzheimer's disease
  4. psychosis
  5. a respiratory condition, i.e., pulmonary disease, that would be exacerbated by inhaling vaporized cannabis
  6. history of cardiovascular disease, including myocardial infarction or stroke;
  7. uncontrolled hypertension, defined as a systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg or a diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mm Hg
  8. pregnancy, breastfeeding, or unwillingness to prevent pregnancy during the cannabis administration portion of the study (using birth control in female participants of child- bearing age)
  9. unwillingness or inability to receive or respond to text messages

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Low CBD session
In the morning, participants will inhale 8 puffs of vaporized cannabis containing 1.9% THC + 0.01% CBD. They will then undergo experimental testing as described below under Outcome Measures.
vaporization of cannabis
Other Names:
  • marijuana
Active Comparator: Medium CBD session
In the morning, participants will inhale 8 puffs of vaporized cannabis 4 puffs will contain 1.9% THC + 0.01% CBD and 4 puffs will contain 1.4% THC + 5.1% CBD. They will then undergo experimental testing as described below under Outcome Measures.
vaporization of cannabis
Other Names:
  • marijuana
Active Comparator: High CBD session
In the morning, participants will inhale 8 puffs of vaporized cannabis containing 1.4% THC + 5.1% CBD. They will then undergo experimental testing as described below under Outcome Measures.
vaporization of cannabis
Other Names:
  • marijuana

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 1 - Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Time Frame: Pain is measured once before they receive study medication and then 2 minutes after drug treatment.
This is a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the self-reported level of pain. 0 is the minimum score, indicating no pain. 10 is the maximum score indicating highest level of pain.
Pain is measured once before they receive study medication and then 2 minutes after drug treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase 1 - Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: The PGIC was measured two minutes after drug administration.
This is a 7-point ordinal scale that asks the participant to rate improvement in their pain after drug administration compared to before drug administration. The scale range is 1 to 7. A score of 1 indicates the greatest improvement (reduction) in pain. A score of 7 indicates that pain is worse.
The PGIC was measured two minutes after drug administration.
Phase 1 - Von Frey Test
Time Frame: The von Frey test was administered before drug administration and two minutes after drug administration.
This test measures sensitivity to pain causes by physical contact with the skin. The von Frey filament is applied to the dorsum of the more painful foot until bending is observed for 3 seconds. Pain is rated using a visual analog score (VAS). The scale is 0 to 100, where 0 indicates no pain and 100 indicates the worst pain.
The von Frey test was administered before drug administration and two minutes after drug administration.
Phase 1 - Marijuana Subscale (M-scale) of the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI)
Time Frame: The M-scale was administered 2 minutes after drug treatment.
The M-scale has 12 true/false statements describing the subjective effects of marijuana on participants after they take the drug. Each question is scored as 0 or 1. The scale ranges from 0 (minimum score) to 12 (maximum score). A lower score indicates that the participant is experiencing fewer side effects of the drug. A higher score indicates that the participant is experiencing more side effects of the drug. Reported side effects on this scale include dry mouth, slower movements, shaking hands, and having a pleasant feeling.
The M-scale was administered 2 minutes after drug treatment.
Phase 1 - Levels of the Endocannabinoid Biomarker Anandamide (AEA)
Time Frame: AEA was quantified 60 minutes after drug administration.
Anandamide levels in plasma were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS).
AEA was quantified 60 minutes after drug administration.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Brook L Henry, PhD, University of California, San Diego

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 24, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The principal investigator, Brook Henry PhD (blhenry@ucsd.edu), will supply individual participant data to other researchers after the project is completed.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cannabis

Clinical Trials on Cannabis

Subscribe