Trial Outcomes for Massage: Caregiver-Assisted vs. Therapist-Treated (TOMCATT)

March 29, 2023 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Trial Outcomes for Massage: Caregiver-Assisted vs. Therapist-Treated (TOMCATT)

Given the modest effectiveness of current treatments and the burden chronic neck pain places on Veterans, the investigators' research proposal is significant in several regards. First, Trial Outcomes for Massage: Caregiver-Assisted vs. Therapist-Treated (TOMCATT) Study directly addresses a high priority area for the VA and is well aligned with the VHA Pain Management Strategy and VHA Pain Management Directive 2009-053. Second, because previous massage studies have included relatively small sample sizes, this trial will provide information vital to fill an evidence vacuum regarding effectiveness of a massage treatments for chronic neck pain. Third, TOMCATT will extend the current understanding of non-pharmacological treatments. Fourth, if the study hypotheses are corroborated massage may emerge as an effective, safe, affordable, sustainable, and accessible treatment for Veterans.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Neck pain is the fourth leading cause of disability in the US, after back pain, depression, and joint pain, and accounts for more than 10 million medical visits per year. Conventional treatments (medications, physical therapy) are widely used for chronic neck pain, yet have modest effectiveness and may carry risks, such as the toxicities associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids. As a result many patients live with chronic, often debilitating, pain. Patients unable to find relief frequently turn to complementary health approaches. Complementary therapies are exceptionally popular among Veterans; 82% reported use of at least one complementary therapy and nearly all (99%) were willing to try massage for pain relief. Neck pain is the second most common reason for using a complementary therapy, with massage used for neck pain more commonly than all other complementary therapies except chiropractic care. Of all complementary approaches, massage was the most preferred by Veterans. In a national survey, almost two-thirds (61%) of individuals with neck pain who used both complementary and conventional treatments perceived complementary to be more helpful, whereas only 6% perceived conventional treatments to be better.

Objectives: The Trial Outcomes for Massage: Caregiver-Assisted vs. Therapist-Treated (TOMCATT) Study is a 2-arm, parallel group, randomized clinical trial that will last 6 months. The TOMCATT Study will target 264 Veterans with chronic neck pain and will compare therapist-treated massage to a waitlist control arm on primary, secondary, and exploratory outcomes. There was previously an additional group staff randomized 102 Veterans and their Care Allies to, but are no longer randomizing into this group.

Methods: This study sample will include 264 Veterans with chronic neck pain. Patients from the 5 primary care clinics at the Roudebush VA Medical Center (RVAMC) and 3 community based outpatient clinics (Terre Haute, Martinsville, and Bloomington) will be recruited to participate. The Trial Outcomes for Massage: Caregiver-Assisted vs. Therapist-Treated (TOMCATT) Study will be a 2-arm, parallel group, randomized clinical trial. Eligible participants will be randomized to one of two study arms: 1) Patients in the therapist-treated arm will receive 3 months of twice weekly massage delivered by certified massage therapists. The second and comparator arm will be a waitlist control. The trial will last 6 months and compare therapist-delivered massage to control on neck pain outcomes. The investigators will compare changes in pain-related disability (primary outcome) between the two groups (Aim 1) and examine secondary outcomes: pain severity, quality of life, depression, anxiety, and stress (Aim 2) as well as exploratory outcomes. To examine the implementation potential of the intervention, including facilitators and barriers, the investigators will conduct post-study, in-depth qualitative interviews of a subsample of study participants (Veteran patients and caregivers) the massage group and the no-longer enrolling CAM group(Aim 3). Lastly, the investigators will assess treatment fidelity and compare the relative intervention costs and budget impact for both interventions. The intervention period will last for 3 months, after which time Veterans will be followed for an additional 3 months.

Innovation: The TOMCATT Study is a novel extension of the investigators' prior work, has strong implementation potential, and innovates by placing caregivers in a treatment delivery role that has the potential to reach a greater number of Veterans with chronic neck pain while also producing substantial cost-savings. Although studies have shown that massage is effective for pain, caregiver-delivered strategies have not been tested or implemented in any systematic way across VA.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

395

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-2803
        • Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic neck pain for 6 months or longer
  • Neck pain of at least moderate severity (NDI score greater than or equal to 10)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neck pain secondary to vertebral fracture or metastatic cancer
  • Complex neck pain (e.g. cervical radiculopathy or recent whiplash injury)
  • Any massage professional massage therapy within the last 6 months
  • Active suicidal ideation
  • Moderate to severe cognitive impairment
  • Pending neck surgery
  • Involvement in active pain or massage trials

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Therapist treated massage (TT-M)
Participants randomized to the therapist-treated massage (TT-M) arm will receive a standardized Swedish massage protocol tailored to chronic neck pain. Massage sessions will involve a maximum of 60 minutes of hands-on, table time and occur twice a week (a frequency which balances practicality and efficacy) for 3 months.
Participants randomized to the therapist-treated massage (TT-M) arm will receive a standardized Swedish massage protocol tailored to chronic neck pain. Massage sessions will involve a maximum of 60 minutes of hands-on, table time and occur twice a week (a frequency which balances practicality and efficacy) for 3 months.
Other Names:
  • TT-M
No Intervention: Wait list control (WL-C)
Participants in the waitlist control will be instructed to continue their medical care as normal and to not begin any massage treatment during the 6 months of the study. At the competition of the final 6 month outcome, participants in the control arm will be eligible to attend a caregiver training session and receive a complementary massage session from a TOMCATT study therapist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Neck Disability index
Time Frame: 3 month
The NDI is the standard instrument for measuring self-rated disability due to neck pain. The NDI was developed as a modification of the well-validated Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Index. The NDI consists of 10-items that assess pain and functioning. All items are framed as a "problem right now" and are scored on a 6-point numeric rating scores of 0 to 5, with 5 being "worst." The total score ranges from 0 to 50, with higher scores representing greater disability from chronic neck pain. The NDI has strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.80) and construct validity. Scoring of the NDI involves: 1) summing the score for each item (raw score); or 2) raw score can be multiplied by 2 to produce a percentage score. The following scoring intervals aid interpretation: 0 - 4 = no disability; 5 - 14 = mild; 15 - 24 = moderate; 25 - 34 = severe; and > 34 = complete disability. At least a 5-point change is defined as "clinically meaningful."
3 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Brief pain inventory (BPI)
Time Frame: baseline, 1,3 and 6 month outcomes
The Brief Pain Inventory is an 11-item, multidimensional pain measurement tool with reliability in patients with arthritis as well as other pain conditions. The BPI rates the intensity of pain as well as the interference of pain with mood, physical activity, work, social activity, relations, sleep, and enjoyment of life.
baseline, 1,3 and 6 month outcomes
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) pain
Time Frame: baseline, 1,3 and 6 month outcomes
Pain interference will be assessed with the 4-item short form included in the PROMIS-29 Profile designed to measure physical functioning as a part of overall self-reported health and validated in large clinical and community samples
baseline, 1,3 and 6 month outcomes
Medical outcomes study Veterans RAND 36 Item Health Survey (VR-36) (modified from Medical Outcomes Study SF-36)
Time Frame: baseline, 1,3 and 6 month outcomes
Health-related quality of life will be measured with the VR-36, a modified version of the Medical Outcomes Study SF-36 widely used in VA research and available in the public domain. Internal consistency is high.
baseline, 1,3 and 6 month outcomes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IIR 15-333

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Therapist treated massage

3
Subscribe