Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for cT1N0M0 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

September 5, 2018 updated by: Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital

A Multi-center, Randomized-controlled, Open-label Clinical Trial: Sublobar Resection Versus Lobectomy for cT1N0M0 Non-small-cell Lung Cancer

The incidence rate of ground-glass opacity (GGO) has been increasing these years. A great number of retrospective studies suggested that sublobar resection was better for some GGO patients. However, no prospective clinical study supports the perspective. This study is prospective, multi-center, randomized-controlled. The aim of this study is to investigate whether sublobar resection is inferior to lobectomy for cT1N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer or not.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cT1N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer
  • ground-glass opacity, ≤2cm, GGO≥25%
  • eligible for both lobectomy and sublobar resection
  • intraoperative pathology is minimally-invasive adenocarcinoma or invasive adenocarcinoma
  • intraoperative pathology of biopsied station 10 lymph node is negative

Exclusion Criteria:

  • intraoperative pathology is benign nodule, atypical adenomatous hyperplasia, or adenocarcinoma in-situ
  • intraoperative pathology of biopsied station 10 lymph node is positive
  • multiple GGOs, lesions other than dominant lesion are malignant or >5mm
  • history of thoracic surgery
  • history of malignancy in recent 5 years
  • unstable systemic disease
  • patients with psychiatric disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Sublobar group
Patients receive sublobar resection, including wedge resection and segmentectomy.
Patients receive sublobar resection, which includes wedge resection and segmentectomy.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Lobectomy group
Patients receive lobectomy.
patients receive lobectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: five years after surgery
survival status of patients after surgery
five years after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Morbidity rate
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
the rates of complications related to treatment during perioperative period
up to 30 days after surgery
Mortality rate
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
the rates of death related to treatment during perioperative period
up to 30 days after surgery
Disease Free Survival
Time Frame: five years after surgery
recurrence status of patients after surgery
five years after surgery
Local and distant recurrence rates
Time Frame: five years after surgery
recurrence rate of local and distant locations respectively
five years after surgery
Pulmonary Function: forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) in liter
Time Frame: 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery
FEV1 of patients after surgery
3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery
Pulmonary Function: forced vital capacity (FVC) in liter
Time Frame: 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery
FVC of patients after surgery
3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery
Pulmonary Function: diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in mL/min/mmHg
Time Frame: 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery
DLCO of patients after surgery
3rd, 6th, 12th, and 24th month after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 18, 2017

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

April 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

September 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 5, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data of all case report forms are to be collected and shared with other researchers at the end of followup.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Clinical Trials on sublobar resection

Subscribe