Evaluation of Scanoskin for the Assessment of Vitiligo

September 27, 2019 updated by: Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust

Comparison of Scanoskin With Planimetry as an Objective Measure of Vitiligo.

The aim of this study is to establish whether the use of a special digital camera (SIAscopy) can provide an accurate and reliable measure of vitiligo which is at least equivalent to the current gold standard of planimetry. If so, SIAscopy could be used as an objective diagnostic and prognostic tool in the management of vitiligo patients within dermatology departments and allow a fair and accurate assessment of new potential treatments.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Vitiligo is a common, disfiguring skin complaint which affects between 0.5 and 2% of the world population and which presents with de-pigmented patches of skin. Highly stigmatising it has a profound psychological impact on those affected and negatively impacts quality of life. Efficacy of current therapies which include topical steroids/calcineurin inhibitors and ultraviolet light are limited and new treatments are required. Numerous papers including the 2010 Cochrane review have highlighted the need for a consensus on outcome measures which could then facilitate meta-analyses and provide robust clinical recommendations. No standard method of measuring skin re-pigmentation has been identified to date and current best practice relies on clinician assessment and use of various non-standardised grading systems (of which there are over 40 none of which has been proven superior or accepted by the consensus of clinicians) and in addition are neither robust nor objective. Measurement of skin pigment levels can be achieved using portable devices such as Spectrophotometric Intracutaneous Analysis scope (SIAscope) using an imaging modality called ScanoskinTM. Unlike other digital methods reported in the literature, this has been validated as a quantitative measure of melanin content in the skin, it is portable, easy to use and not prohibitively expensive. The aim of this study is to determine if ScanoskinTM is equivalent to the current gold standard of planimetry (mainly used in research setting) for establishing extent of vitiligo. In addition the investigators want to assess whether it offers a more objective standardised measure of vitiligo compared with clinician assessment (current accepted best clinical practice) which could then be utilised to provide a meaningful assessment of new and existing treatment modalities. In addition the investigators will assess whether ScanoskinTM is able to identify subclinical disease which could affect clinical decisions regarding treatment strategies and also assess whether improvements in pigmentation correlate with patient satisfaction and quality of life scores.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

15

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SW10 9NH
        • Chelsea And Westminster Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All adult patients attending outpatient dermatology clinics at Chelsea & Westminster Hospital and diagnosed with vitiligo will be invited to take part in the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients diagnosed with vitiligo (any form) by a Consultant Dermatologist/Specialist Dermatology trainee.
  • Who undergo any form of treatment or observation.
  • Informed consent for enrolment into the study.
  • Referred for assessment and treatment at Chelsea & Westminster Hospital Dermatology Department.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients not consenting to participate.
  • Patients with insufficient English to comprehend the Patient Information Sheet (regrettably we are unable to offer translation services for this scope).
  • Patients without capacity to comprehend the Patient Information Sheet would be deemed unable to give informed consent and therefore not included.
  • Patients unable to undertake the imaging process for whatever reason.
  • Patients unable to attend for follow up assessment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Scanoskin with planimetry as an objective measure of vitiligo.
Time Frame: 3 years
Comparing planimetry to Scanoskin ability to work out surface area and percentage pigmentation of vitiligo lesions
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Determine whether Scanoskin can identify subclinical disease
Time Frame: 3 years
Taking standardised Scanoskin images of unaffected skin over time to determine if Scanoskin can pick up subclinical disease
3 years
Determine whether Scanoskin can identify subclinical response to treatment
Time Frame: 3 years
Comparing images to non affected areas over time
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucy J Thomas, MBChB, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust
  • Study Director: Declan Colllins, MBBS, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 20, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

April 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • C&W17/029

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Vitiligo

3
Subscribe