- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03135119
Integrating Animal-Assisted Therapy Into Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Maltreated Youth (TF-CBT+AAT)
May 16, 2022 updated by: Brian Allen, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Integrating Animal-Assisted Therapy Into Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Maltreated Youth: A Randomized Feasibility Trial
This study will examine the incremental benefit of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) as an adjunct intervention when combined with Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) for the treatment of maltreated youth.
In addition, the development of therapeutic rapport and the intensity of stress experienced during treatment sessions will be examined as mediational mechanisms of treatment outcome.
This project will help determine whether a larger study to test the beneficial effects of AAT for maltreated youth is feasible and warranted.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The eventual goal of this line of research is to determine whether, and through what mechanisms, Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT) is beneficial for the treatment of maltreated youth.
The current project is a feasibility study to determine if larger clinical trials are warranted.
The specific aims of the current study are (1) to examine whether the integration of AAT into standard Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) enhances treatment effectiveness, (2) to evaluate the tolerability and feasibility of AAT when integrated into TF-CBT, and (3) to evaluate hypothesized mediational processes that may explain observed positive effects for the integration of AAT.
Maltreated youth may display myriad emotional and behavioral symptoms; prominent among these is posttraumatic stress (PTS).
TF-CBT is a well-established evidence-based treatment for PTS and other symptoms subsequent to child maltreatment and, therefore, is a suitable intervention for this trial.
Sixty (60) maltreated youth (ages 6-17) displaying elevated PTS will be assigned to receive TF-CBT or TF-CBT+AAT using a blocked randomization procedure.
The TF-CBT protocol is the standard twelve 90-minute sessions typically used in research trials.
Youth in the TF-CBT+AAT condition will receive the standard protocol with a certified service dog present in the room for each session and the youth will be allowed to interact with the dog during session.
A pre-post design will be used to ascertain whether the addition of AAT prompts greater PTS reduction as well as greater improvements in other outcomes, including internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and emotion regulation.
Outcome metrics include caregiver and youth-reported objective measures, and respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) assessed via an electrocardiogram (ECG) during both a resting and stress reactivity paradigm.
Feasibility metrics assessed include treatment satisfaction, ability to implement the TF-CBT techniques with a dog in the room, treatment disrupting events attributable to the dogs, and whether the dogs experience significant stress as a result of their participation.
Stress experienced by the dog will be determined through RSA, salivary cortisol, and behavioral responses.
Two prominent hypotheses regarding the mechanism of effect for AAT will be examined.
First, therapeutic rapport will be assessed at multiple increments to determine whether the presence of the dog improved the quality or efficiency of development of rapport.
Second, RSA will be recorded for the youth during treatment sessions to determine if the presence of the dog yielded a lower intensity of stress during the sessions.
Both therapeutic rapport and level of in-session stress will be examined as mediating variables to determine whether either explained enhanced treatment outcomes.
To improve the methodological rigor of the study, data will be collected by research assistants blinded to the youth's treatment condition and the same clinicians will implement both treatment conditions, thereby eliminating clinician-specific effects on outcomes.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
33
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States, 17110
- Penn State Hershey Medical Center-TLC Research and Treatment Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
6 years to 17 years (Child)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- A caregiver willing to participate with the youth
- An allegation of child maltreatment investigated by child protective services (CPS) or the police
- A raw score of ≥ 39 (borderline or clinical elevation) on the caregiver- report version of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for the DSM-5.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Severe developmental delays and/or psychiatric problems that necessitate a higher level of care for the child. An allegation of child maltreatment investigated by child protective services (CPS) or the police
- Intellectual deficits for the child (IQ < 80 on a cognitive screener)
- Caregiver inability to complete assessment measures due to psychiatric, cognitive, or other limitation
- The available caregiver is suspected or known to have perpetrated maltreatment
- A fear of dogs, a dog allergy, or any prior history of aggression toward animals for the child and/or caregiver
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: TF-CBT
Youth will receive standard Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
|
TF-CBT is typically described as including 3 phases, each focusing on a common goal and encompassing a third of treatment (4 sessions).
The first phase focuses on skills-building and includes psychoeducation, parenting skills training, relaxation skills training, affect modulation skills training, and cognitive coping skills training.
The second phase involves focused gradual exposure activities, including construction of a narrative account of the child's maltreatment experiences and cognitive processing of maladaptive thoughts.
The third phase emphasizes the child's mastery over environmental reminders of the maltreatment and includes sharing the trauma narrative with the caregiver, in vivo exposure to physical stimuli, and enhancing future development.
|
|
Experimental: TF-CBT+AAT
Youth will received Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy with Animal-Assisted Therapy as an adjunct.
|
TF-CBT, as described in the other arm, with animal-assisted therapy as an adjunct intervention.
During the administration of TF-CBT, a certified service dog will be in the room and the participant may elect to interact with the dog as various points throughout the sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Scores on the UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index
Time Frame: Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
This is a caregiver version of the measure designed to assess child/youth posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms.
This is a 27-item questionnaire were the frequency of each item is reported using a scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Most Days), yielding a potential full scale score ranging from 0 to 108.
For inclusion in this study, a score of at least 32 on the pre-treatment administration was required as this score denotes the "borderline" range for the measure.
Lower scores indicate fewer PTSD symptoms are present.
|
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Emotional Symptoms Subscale
Time Frame: Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a measure assessing the caregiver's observation of assorted emotional and behavioral concerns.
This study utilized the "Emotional Symptoms" subscale, which collectively assesses symptoms of depression and anxiety.
The subscale includes 5 items, each scored on a scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 2 (Certainly True).
This results in possible total scores ranging from 0 to 10 with higher scores indicating a greater level of concern.
|
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
|
Change in Scores on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders
Time Frame: Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders (SCARED) is a 41-item measure where the youth self-reports on concerns related to various forms of anxiety.
Answer options range from 0 (Not True or Hardly Ever True) to 2 (Very Often or Very True), resulting in a possible total score between 0 and 82 with higher scores indicating greater concerns.
|
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
|
Change in Scores on the Moods and Feelings Questionnaire
Time Frame: Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
The Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ) is a 13-item measure that asks youth to report their own concerns with depression-related symptoms.
Each item is answered with a 0 (Not True), 1 (Sometimes Ture), or 2 (True).
The items are summed to create a total score that may range from 0 to 26, with higher scores denoting a greater level of depressive symptoms. .
|
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Brian Allen, Penn State College of Medicine
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 15, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 18, 2020
Study Completion (Actual)
March 18, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 28, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
May 1, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
May 18, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 16, 2022
Last Verified
May 1, 2022
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00006612
- R21HD091887 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The final dataset will be stripped of individual identifiers prior to release for sharing.
Data subsets will only be made available to other users under data-sharing agreements that provide for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed.
Those wishing to access the data will need to directly contact the PI to complete the data-sharing agreement.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Data will be available starting in July, 2020, and will remain available for 5 years.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access to data will require:
- a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant;
- a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology;
- a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed;
- A letter of approval from an applicable Institutional Review Board; and,
- A signed data usage agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Child Abuse
-
Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western NorwayEducational storytelling forlag og filmCompletedChild Abuse | Oral Health | Child Neglect | Child Maltreatment | Child Sexual Abuse | Dental NeglectNorway
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Completed
-
Oral Health Centre of Expertise in Western NorwayOral Health Center of Expertise Rogaland, Norway; Childrens advocacy center... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChild Abuse | Child Neglect | Child MaltreatmentNorway
-
Yeditepe UniversityRecruitingEducational Program's Impact on Nursing Students' Knowledge and Awareness of Child Abuse and NeglectChild Abuse | Child NeglectTurkey
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompletedChild Abuse | Child MaltreatmentSweden
-
University of WashingtonEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedChild Abuse | Child NeglectUnited States
-
University of PittsburghPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Northwell Health; University of...CompletedChild Abuse | Trauma | Child Maltreatment | Physical AbuseUnited States
-
McGill UniversitySave the Children; European Network of Foundations Children and Violence Evaluation... and other collaboratorsUnknown
-
Buzzi Children's HospitalNot yet recruitingChild Abuse | Child Neglect | Child Maltreatment
-
Boston Medical CenterCenter for the Study of Social PolicyCompletedChild Abuse | Parenting | Child Development | Child Rearing | Child NeglectUnited States
Clinical Trials on TF-CBT
-
University of South FloridaCompletedPosttraumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
University of South FloridaCompleted
-
University of WashingtonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingTrauma and Stressor Related Disorders | Trauma, PsychologicalUnited States
-
Medical University of South CarolinaCompletedPost Traumatic Stress DisorderUnited States
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridMinistry of Science and Innovation, Spain; Spanish Association of Victims of...CompletedAnxiety Disorders | Major Depressive Disorder | Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
-
Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known...Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical CenterCompleted
-
Umeå UniversityForte; Region Västerbotten; Stiftelsen Kempe-Carlgrenska Fonden; Visare Norr; Region...RecruitingPost-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)Sweden
-
Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress...CompletedPost Traumatic Stress DisorderNorway
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center at...National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)RecruitingAdolescent | PTSD | Psychological TraumaUnited States
-
Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress...University of South FloridaCompletedDepressive Symptoms | Parental Stress | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) | Health Related Quality of LifeNorway