Project I Test: Implementing HIV Testing in Opioid Treatment Programs

June 16, 2023 updated by: Lisa Metsch, Columbia University

A Cluster RCT to Increase HIV Testing in Substance Use Treatment Programs

This study will test two active evidence-based "practice coaching" (PC) interventions to improve opioid treatment programs' (OTPs') provision and sustained implementation of on-site 1) HIV testing and linkage to care and 2) HIV/Hepatitis C virus (HCV) testing and linkage to care among patients seeking/receiving substance use disorder treatment.

Aims are:

Aim 1: To evaluate the effectiveness of the PC interventions on improving patient uptake of HIV testing in OTPs including the incremental impact of the HIV/HCV intervention on HIV testing.

Aim 2: To examine, using mixed-methods, the impact of the PC interventions on the initiation and sustained provision of HIV testing and timely linkage to care.

Aim 3: To evaluate the health outcomes, health care utilization, and cost-effectiveness of the PC interventions compared incrementally to one another and to the control condition.

Primary Hypothesis:

  1. The two PC interventions will result in significantly higher proportions of patients tested for HIV than the information control condition during the "initial impact" period (7-12 months post-randomization or T3), controlling for the proportion of patients tested during the baseline period, T1 (Primary) and during the "sustained impact" period, 13-18 months post-randomization or T4 (Secondary).
  2. The HIV/HCV PC intervention will result in significantly higher proportions of patients tested for HIV than the HIV PC intervention during the initial impact period (7-12 months post-randomization or T3), controlling for the proportion of patients tested during the baseline period, T1 (Secondary) and during the "sustained impact" period, 13-18 months post-randomization or T4 (Secondary).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Using the most recent National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS) data available from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) as the sampling frame, 51 sites will be randomly selected to participate in the study. Site randomization to condition will occur on a rolling basis. Selected sites will be invited to participate in the study and randomly assigned to one of the three intervention conditions (17 sites per condition) -- information control, HIV PC, and HIV/HCV PC. The control condition will be an HIV testing informational product consisting of the official NIDA/SAMHSA Blending Initiative product, "HIV Rapid Testing in Substance Abuse Treatment Programs," ARTAS intervention information and Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) information that will be provided to OTPs to educate and motivate them about the importance of offering on-site HIV testing and linkage to care. In the active PC conditions, champions and key OTP staff will be provided coaching and support for the implementation of an innovation (i.e., offering HIV testing on-site and linking persons living with HIV to care) and for sustaining resulting improvements in testing.

De-identified aggregate client data on HIV and HCV testing and linkage to care will be provided by the sites for four 6-month-long time intervals: T1 (up to 6 months prior to randomization), T2 (during the intervention/control period, up to 6 months post-randomziation), T3 (7-12 months post-randomization), and T4 (13-18 months post-randomization). Qualitative and quantitative site-level data will also be collected immediately preceding randomization and again during interval T3.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Recruiting
        • Columbia University Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lisa Metsch, PhD
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible sites must:

    1. See at least 150 unduplicated patients/year/site
    2. Be capable and willing to prospectively collect data on the number of patients who a) are offered any HIV and/or HCV tests; b) completed these tests; c) are referred to care/evaluation (and type of referral) if positive; and d) are linked to care/evaluation within 30 days of diagnosis
    3. Be capable and willing to provide patient demographics, testing data within demographic categories of gender and race/ethnicity (in aggregate) and data on HIV/HCV test reimbursement processes and outcomes
    4. Have key staff willing to consent to participate in study surveys, qualitative interviews and intervention coaching throughout the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Sites will be excluded if:

    1. Over 50% of patients served in the prior 6 months were HIV or HCV tested
    2. They are terminated via PI decision/discretion

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HIV Testing Practice Coaching Intervention Group
The HIV Testing Practice Coaching (PC) Intervention is designed to improve the provision and sustained implementation of on-site HIV testing and linkage to care among OTP patients.
The practice coaches (PCs) will work with the programs a) to establish capabilities, reimbursement systems and/or partnerships necessary to support HIV testing and evidence-based linkage to care and b) to reduce barriers (e.g., staffing, training) to the implementation and sustained provision of HIV testing. Information on Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) also will be provided. The intervention will occur over approximately 29 weeks (or 6 months) consisting of four distinct evidence-based phases designed to establish competency in the implementation of organizational change towards establishing HIV testing outcomes among OTP clientele.
Experimental: HIV and HCV Testing Practice Coaching Intervention Group
The HIV and HCV Testing Practice Coaching (PC) Intervention will leverage the HIV PC intervention and follow the same interventional steps described above, and, in addition, provide information and training to support joint HIV/HCV testing and linkage to care among OTP patients.
The practice coaches (PCs) will work with the program team a) to establish capabilities, reimbursement systems and/or partnerships necessary to support HIV and HCV testing and evidence--based linkage to care and b) to reduce barriers (e.g., staffing, training) to the implementation and sustained provision of HIV and HCV testing. Also, due to the expense of HCV treatment, and potentially more complicated mechanisms for linking HCV-positive patients to further evaluation and care which may take more time than anticipated, PCs will provide OTPs with basic education and motivation about the importance of HCV testing for reasons other than immediate curative treatment. Information on PrEP also will be provided. The intervention will occur over approximately 29 weeks (or 6 months).
Other: Information Control Group
The administrators of OTPs assigned to the control condition will receive a website link to and hard copy of the NIDA/SAMHSA Blending Initiative product for HIV rapid testing.
The OTPs assigned to this group will be provided access to the NIDA/SAMHSA Blending Initiative product for HIV rapid testing. Resources generated from the HIV rapid testing Blending Initiative product include a fact sheet, resource guide, marketing materials, and an Excel-based budgeting tool. In addition to the HIV-specific materials, the website provides opportunities for training, self-study progress, workshop, and distance learning. OTPs also will receive a link to the Anti-Retroviral Treatment and Access to Services (ARTAS) intervention training website which provides information and training courses. Sites also will receive a hard (or electronic) copy of the ARTAS implementation manual and information about the provision of HIV testing, linkage to care and PrEP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of OTP patients HIV tested at 6 months post intervention or control, while controlling for HIV testing during the baseline period (T1)
Time Frame: The period 7-12 months post site-randomization (T3).
The primary outcome measure will be a contrast of the proportion of OTP patients HIV tested during T3, controlling for HIV testing at baseline (T1). The primary test will be whether the proportion of patients tested across the two PC interventions--HIV Testing PC Intervention Group and HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group--differs from the proportion of patients tested in the Information Control Group.
The period 7-12 months post site-randomization (T3).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of OTP patients HIV tested at 12 months post intervention or control
Time Frame: The period 13-18 months post site-randomization.
The secondary outcome measure will be the proportion of OTP patients HIV tested during T4, controlling for HIV testing at baseline (T1). One test will be whether the proportion of patients tested across the two PC interventions--HIV Testing PC Intervention Group and HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group--differs from the proportion of patients tested in the Information Control Group. A second test will be whether the proportion of OTP patients HIV tested during T4 in the HIV Testing PC Intervention Group differs from the proportion of patients tested in the HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group.
The period 13-18 months post site-randomization.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
OTPs' incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)
Time Frame: 6 months post randomization (T2).
The ICER is a statistic used to summarize the cost-effectiveness of a health care intervention and is defined by the difference in cost between two possible interventions, divided by the difference in their effect. One ICER will be calculated for the difference between the Information Control Group and HIV Testing PC Intervention Group. A second ICER will be calculated for the difference between the HIV Testing PC Intervention Group and the HIV/HCV Testing PC Intervention Group.
6 months post randomization (T2).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa Metsch, PhD, Columbia University
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Feaster, PhD, University of Miami
  • Principal Investigator: Jemima Frimpong, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
  • Study Director: Lauren Gooden, PhD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 12, 2017

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 26, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

June 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 16, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data and associated documentation may become available to other researchers under a data-sharing agreement. All interested researchers must contact the PI and provide a proposal explaining the analysis that will be conducted and specify which IPD is needed to accomplish this.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C

Clinical Trials on HIV Testing Practice Coaching Intervention

3
Subscribe