Evaluation of Clear Aligner Trays to Straighten Teeth

November 27, 2024 updated by: Solventum Orthodontics Corporation

Evaluation of 3M Clear Aligner for Correction of Class I, II and III Malocclusion Study

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of Clear Aligners to correct tooth malocclusions with the use of attachments and/or buttons, as determined by the amount of teeth movement and overall achievement goals of the treatment plan.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multi-center study with a maximum duration of 24 months or longer depending on refinements, to assess the safety and efficacy of 3M Clear Aligners, with the use of attachments to correct teeth malocclusions.

The subject population for this study will be male and female subjects ≥ 14 years of age. Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate in the study. Up to a total of 180 subjects may be enrolled at up to 12 different clinical research sites, (up to 15 subjects per site).

The subjects will undergo a target of up to 24 months (or longer depending on refinements) of treatment to align the teeth to the planned target. Subjects will wear the Clear Aligners for at least 22 hours per day, with the exception of consumption of meals and beverages, with the exception of water, which can be consumed while wearing the aligners. During each 6-week period between follow up visits, subjects will wear each set of Clear Aligners for 2 weeks, in the order indicated per the Orthodontists treatment plan.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80209-3244
        • Benson Orthodontics
    • Georgia
      • Kennesaw, Georgia, United States, 30144
        • Depew Orthodontics
    • Maryland
      • Catonsville, Maryland, United States, 21228
        • Orthodontics Associates
    • Minnesota
      • Woodbury, Minnesota, United States, 55125
        • Henseler Orthodontics
      • Woodbury, Minnesota, United States, 55125
        • Horton Orthodontics
    • Ohio
      • Fairlawn, Ohio, United States, 44333
        • Mellion Orthodontics
      • Norwalk, Ohio, United States, 44857
        • Wolf/Chhibber Orthodontics
    • Texas
      • McKinney, Texas, United States, 75070
        • Simply Smiles Orthodontics
    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
        • Riolo Orthodontics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject is at least 14 years of age.
  2. Subject is willing and able to give informed consent.
  3. Subject is willing to be digitally scanned at each 6-week visit, including after application of attachments.
  4. Subject has a need for single or double arch orthodontic treatment with a target duration of 18 months or less.
  5. Subject has good oral hygiene defined by the orthodontist.
  6. Subject has only permanent dentition.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has skeletal discrepancies requiring surgery
  2. Subject is undergoing active dental work
  3. Subject has severe open bite > 2 mm
  4. Subject has severe overjet > 4 mm
  5. Subject has deep bite > 3 mm
  6. Subject has over crowding per arch > 4 mm
  7. Subject has dental prostheses/implants that will interfere with projected teeth movement
  8. Subject is taking systemic steroid medication
  9. Subject is taking Biphosphonates or any other medication for treatment of osteoporosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 3M Clear Aligner
Clear Aligner for Orthodontic Treatment
Clear Aligner used to straighten teeth to desired outcome
Other Names:
  • 3M Clear Aligner

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful Correction of Malocclusion
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Achievement of target setup per treatment plan as determined by Orthodontist.
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individual Tooth Movement
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Achievement of individual tooth movement measured per treatment plan and digital scan
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Treatment Time for Tooth Movement
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Achievement of individual tooth movement measured per treatment plan
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Effective Use of Attachments
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Effective use of attachment by tracking attachment bond failures by visual assessment
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Orthodontist Satisfaction
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Orthodontist satisfaction with treatment outcome
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Software Satisfaction
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Orthodontist satisfaction with treatment management software -Ease of use in ordering products
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Aligner Comfort
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Aligner comfortable to wear
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Appearance Satisfaction
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with appearance during treatment
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Aligner Ease of Cleaning
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with ease of cleaning during treatment
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Ease of Insertion
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically aligners easy to insert
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Mid Course Corrections/Refinements Needed
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Number of mid course refinements or corrections
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Ease of Aligner Removal
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically with aligner removal
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

3M

Investigators

  • Study Director: Gail E Maxey, BA, CCRA, 3M Company

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 9, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

October 9, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 3, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • US-05-013821/11-050005

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Clear Aligner

Subscribe