- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03141788
Evaluation of Clear Aligner Trays to Straighten Teeth
Evaluation of 3M Clear Aligner for Correction of Class I, II and III Malocclusion Study
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, multi-center study with a maximum duration of 24 months or longer depending on refinements, to assess the safety and efficacy of 3M Clear Aligners, with the use of attachments to correct teeth malocclusions.
The subject population for this study will be male and female subjects ≥ 14 years of age. Subjects who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate in the study. Up to a total of 180 subjects may be enrolled at up to 12 different clinical research sites, (up to 15 subjects per site).
The subjects will undergo a target of up to 24 months (or longer depending on refinements) of treatment to align the teeth to the planned target. Subjects will wear the Clear Aligners for at least 22 hours per day, with the exception of consumption of meals and beverages, with the exception of water, which can be consumed while wearing the aligners. During each 6-week period between follow up visits, subjects will wear each set of Clear Aligners for 2 weeks, in the order indicated per the Orthodontists treatment plan.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80209-3244
- Benson Orthodontics
-
-
Georgia
-
Kennesaw, Georgia, United States, 30144
- Depew Orthodontics
-
-
Maryland
-
Catonsville, Maryland, United States, 21228
- Orthodontics Associates
-
-
Minnesota
-
Woodbury, Minnesota, United States, 55125
- Henseler Orthodontics
-
Woodbury, Minnesota, United States, 55125
- Horton Orthodontics
-
-
Ohio
-
Fairlawn, Ohio, United States, 44333
- Mellion Orthodontics
-
Norwalk, Ohio, United States, 44857
- Wolf/Chhibber Orthodontics
-
-
Texas
-
McKinney, Texas, United States, 75070
- Simply Smiles Orthodontics
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98101
- Riolo Orthodontics
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is at least 14 years of age.
- Subject is willing and able to give informed consent.
- Subject is willing to be digitally scanned at each 6-week visit, including after application of attachments.
- Subject has a need for single or double arch orthodontic treatment with a target duration of 18 months or less.
- Subject has good oral hygiene defined by the orthodontist.
- Subject has only permanent dentition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has skeletal discrepancies requiring surgery
- Subject is undergoing active dental work
- Subject has severe open bite > 2 mm
- Subject has severe overjet > 4 mm
- Subject has deep bite > 3 mm
- Subject has over crowding per arch > 4 mm
- Subject has dental prostheses/implants that will interfere with projected teeth movement
- Subject is taking systemic steroid medication
- Subject is taking Biphosphonates or any other medication for treatment of osteoporosis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: 3M Clear Aligner
Clear Aligner for Orthodontic Treatment
|
Clear Aligner used to straighten teeth to desired outcome
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Successful Correction of Malocclusion
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Achievement of target setup per treatment plan as determined by Orthodontist.
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Individual Tooth Movement
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Achievement of individual tooth movement measured per treatment plan and digital scan
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Treatment Time for Tooth Movement
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Achievement of individual tooth movement measured per treatment plan
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Effective Use of Attachments
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Effective use of attachment by tracking attachment bond failures by visual assessment
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Orthodontist Satisfaction
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Orthodontist satisfaction with treatment outcome
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Software Satisfaction
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Orthodontist satisfaction with treatment management software -Ease of use in ordering products
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Aligner Comfort
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Aligner comfortable to wear
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Appearance Satisfaction
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Subject satisfaction with appearance during treatment
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Aligner Ease of Cleaning
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Subject satisfaction with ease of cleaning during treatment
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Ease of Insertion
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically aligners easy to insert
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Mid Course Corrections/Refinements Needed
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Number of mid course refinements or corrections
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
|
Ease of Aligner Removal
Time Frame: The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Subject satisfaction with treatment; specifically with aligner removal
|
The expected duration of subject participation was to be 6 to 24 months. Due to additional time needed for orthodontic refinements, the actual longest duration was approximately 28 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Director: Gail E Maxey, BA, CCRA, 3M Company
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- US-05-013821/11-050005
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Malocclusion
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityPEBS DENTAL CLINICRecruitingClass II Div 1 Malocclusion | Class III Malocclusion | Class II Division 2 Malocclusion | Class I MalocclusionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Hesham Nabil Ali Al-QamhawyAl-Azhar UniversityRecruitingBimaxillary Protrusion | Malocclusion, Angle Class II, Division 1 | Class I MalocclusionEgypt
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionGöteborg University; Region Halland; Västra GötalandsregionenNot yet recruitingClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1 | OverjetSweden
-
Universidad Complutense de MadridOrtoestetic (https://ortoestetic.com)Not yet recruiting
-
TC Erciyes UniversityCompletedClass III Skeletal MalocclusionTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Damascus UniversityCompletedCLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSIONSyria
-
mahmoud abdelhameed mohamedCompleted
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakRecruiting
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompletedClass II Malocclusion | Class II Malocclusion, Division 1Turkey
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompleted3D Evaluation of Powerscope Appliance in Treatment of Skeletal Class 2 Malocclusion (Powerscope app)Class II Malocclusion, Division 1Egypt
Clinical Trials on Clear Aligner
-
University of MichiganCompletedMicrobial Colonization | Orthodontic AlignerUnited States
-
University of GenovaUniversity of Milan - Prof. Maspero Cinzia; University of Milan - Dr. Abate...Not yet recruitingJuvenile Idiopathic Arthritis | Malocclusion, Angle Class IIItaly
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillRecruiting
-
Lokman Hekim ÜniversitesiCompletedMalocclusion; Displaced or Missing TeethTurkey
-
Mersin UniversityCompletedCrowding, Tooth | Angle's Class I MalocclusionTurkey
-
Mansoura UniversityRecruitingAnterior CrossbiteEgypt
-
Faculty of Dental Medicine for GirlsCompletedSpacing Between Anterior Teeth | The Present Study Aimed to Evaluate Root Parallelism in Cases of Anterior Teeth Spacing Treated with Clear Aligner Versus Fixed Orthodontic AppliancesEgypt
-
Ozge GungorAkdeniz UniversityCompleted
-
Jordan University of Science and TechnologyCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedOrthodontics | Orthodontic Treatment | Tooth CrowdingUnited States