Rotation of an Intraocular Lens - HOYA Vivinex iSert P261 (Rot P261)

May 15, 2017 updated by: Rupert Menapace, Medical University of Vienna

Age-related cataract is the main cause of impaired vision in the elderly population worldwide. In the UK, more than half of people who are over 65 years old have some cataract development in one or both eyes. The only treatment that can restore functional visual ability is cataract surgery where the opacified crystalline lens is removed by phacoemulsification and an artificial intraocular lens is implanted. It is estimated that around 10 million cataract operations are performed around the world each year. Cataract operations are generally very successful, with a low risk of serious complications.

During the past two decades, cataract surgery underwent tremendous change and modernisation resulting in today's small incision phacoemulsification surgery and a safe technique with a short rehabilitation time for the patient. Traditional spherical monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) restore best-corrected vision and may lessen the need for spectacles. These IOLs correct only the spherical portion of the total refractive error and do not correct corneal astigmatism. Astigmatism is a visually disabling refractive error affecting the general population, especially those with cataract. At least 15% to 20% of cataract patients have 1.5 diopters (D) or more of corneal or refractive astigmatism. With increased patient expectations, the trend is not only to remove the cataract but also to address the problem of pre-existing astigmatism at the time of surgery.

Surgical-induced astigmatism can be reduced by smaller incisions, i.e. microincision cataract surgery (MICS), which by definition is surgery performed through incisions smaller than 2.0 mm, reducing the need for suturing. This results in better corneal optical quality, thus improving visual outcomes. There are also other surgical options to correct preexisting astigmatism during cataract surgery like: selectively positioning of the phacoemulsification incision; astigmatic keratotomy with corneal or limbal relaxing incisions; excimer laser refractive procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy, laser in situ keratomileusis, and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy; or implanting pseudophakic toric posterior chamber intraocular lenses (IOLs).

Toric IOLs have been shown to result in good visual and refractive outcomes. Combined with MICS, these IOLs can allow effective correction of cylindrical errors intraoperatively, improving visual quality and thus leading to spectacle independence. Plate haptic and loop haptic toric IOLs have been considered for about a decade but have been associated with postoperative rotational instability. Rotation of a toric lens from its intended orientation degrades its corrective power, with approximately 3.3% loss of cylindrical power for every degree off axis. A misorientation of approximately 30° negates the effectiveness of astigmatic correction, and a misorientation of more than 30° may induce additional astigmatism. Although some patients are asymptomatic despite induced astigmatism, others experience symptoms such as blurred or distorted vision, headache, fatigue, eyestrain, squinting, or eye discomfort. Thus, IOL orientation stability is an essential goal in toric IOL design.

RATIONALE

The purpose of this study is to assess the axial IOL rotation and optical quality (refraction, visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, decentration and tilt) and capsular bag reaction after micro-incision surgery with an IOL implantation in cataract patients - HOYA Vivinex iSert® model P261.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University Vienna

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

46 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Uni- or bilateral age-related cataract necessitating phacoemulsification extraction and posterior IOL implantation
  • Need for spherical IOL correction between 15.00 and 25.00 D
  • Pupil dilation of ≥ 6.5 mm
  • Age 50 and older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Corneal abnormality
  • Pseudoexfoliation
  • Preceding ocular surgery or trauma
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma
  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy
  • Iris neovascularization
  • History of uveitis/iritis
  • Microphthalmus
  • Recurrent intraocular inflammation of unknown etiology
  • Blind fellow eye
  • Uncontrolled systemic or ocular disease
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: 0°
Implantation of the intraocular lens Vivinex p261 on axis 0°
Other: 45°
Implantation of the intraocular lens Vivinex p261 on axis 45°
Other: 90°
Implantation of the intraocular lens Vivinex p261 on axis 90°
Other: 135°
Implantation of the intraocular lens Vivinex p261 on axis 135°

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of axial intraocular lens position
Time Frame: 7 months
Change in axial intraocular lens position from end of surgery (baseline axis) to 4-7 months (end of study visit)
7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 6, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 2, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

October 2, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2017

Last Verified

May 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EK 1437/2014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intraocular Lens

Clinical Trials on Intraocular Lens Implantation

Subscribe