Clinical Evaluation of the Performance of a Difluoroethane-based Cyto-selective Cryotherapy to Treat Dark Spots on the Hand in 30 Volunteers. (CBT)

September 11, 2017 updated by: Cryobeauty
This study evaluates the performance of "CRYOBEAUTY MAINS", a Cyto-selective Cryotherapy based on Difluoroethane as a treatment of Solar Lentigines in 30 volunteers. Only one application of "CRYOBEAUTY MAINS" in one hand (right or left hand according to the randomization code).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nice, France, 06200
        • Cpcad Nice Hôpital Archet 2

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Phototype II to IV
  • Subjects having brown spots (solar lentigo) on both hands, diameter ≤ 6 mm (at least 1 spot per hand).
  • Accepting not to expose themselves to the sun (or artificial UV) during the study.
  • Affiliated to a health insurance scheme in accordance with the French law on research involving the human subjects
  • Informed, having undergone a general medical examination attesting to his / her ability to participate in the study.
  • Having given informed written consent for their participation in the study.

Non inclusion Criteria:

  • Having carried out aesthetic care (exfoliants, scrubs or self-tanning, manicure, hand care, UV ...) in the month prior to the start of the study, on the hands.
  • Having applied a depigmenting product in the month prior to the start of the study, on the hands.
  • Having carried out aesthetic care at a dermatologist (laser, IPL, peeling, depigmenting creams, cryotherapy ...), on the hands, during the last 6 months.
  • Presenting dermatosis, autoimmune disease, systemic, chronic or acute illness, or any other condition that may interfere with the treatment or influence the results of the study (diabetic, circulatory, cold allergic, Raynaud's syndrome ...)
  • Any general or local treatment (dermocorticoids, corticosteroids, diuretics, etc.) likely to interfere with the evaluation of the parameter studied.
  • Participating in another study or being in an exclusion period from a previous study
  • Being unable to comply to the protocole.
  • Having Received over 4,500 euros compensation for his / her participation in clinical trials in the previous 12 months, including participation in this study.
  • Vulnerable: being unable to give or refuse consent.
  • Protected by the law (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice ...).
  • Unable to write or read in French.
  • Can not be contacted by telephone.
  • For female subjects:

    • Pregnant woman (or wanting to be pregnant during the study) or during breastfeeding.
    • Female not willing to use contraceptives.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CRYOBEAUTY MAINS
Cryotherapy medical device designed to treat solar lentigo on the randomized hand.
CYOBEAUTY MAINS diffuses Difluoroethane gas to the skin. The administration of the cryogenic gas is temperature controlled, accurate and contactless (by means of a spray nozzle), in small quantity (<1g) and during a predetermined short duration (3 seconds)
No Intervention: Control
The non randomized hand is not teated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of CRYOBEAUTY MAINS's performance
Time Frame: 8 weeks

Hexsel scoring:

  1. > Very significant clearance (about 90%); only minor evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  2. > Significant improvement (about 75%); some evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  3. > Intermediate between marked and slight improvement; about 50% improvement in the appearance of hyper pigmentation
  4. > Some improvement (about 25%); however, significant evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  5. > Hyperpigmentation has not changed since baseline
  6. > Worse (hyperpigmentation is worse than at baseline)
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of solar lentigines numbers
Time Frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Counting by enumeration of spots
0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Evaluation of solar lentigines numbers
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Counting by enumeration of spots
4 weeks
Evaluation of solar lentigines numbers
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Counting by enumeration of spots
8 weeks
Evaluation of solar lentigines colors
Time Frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Colors assessment: by using Mexameter® MX 18
0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Evaluation of solar lentigines colors
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Colors assessment: by using Mexameter® MX 18
4 weeks
Evaluation of solar lentigines colors
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Colors assessment: by using Mexameter® MX 18
8 weeks
Assessment of pain intensity
Time Frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
VAS
0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Complication and adverse events rate
Time Frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Any complications or adverse events related or not to the treatment will be collected and evaluated.
0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Complication and adverse events rate
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Any complications or adverse events related or not to the treatment will be collected and evaluated.
4 weeks
Complication and adverse events rate
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Any complications or adverse events related or not to the treatment will be collected and evaluated.
8 weeks
Assessment of ergonomic and device's readiness
Time Frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Ergonomic and device's readiness questionnaire : 6 QCM questions are given to the participants
0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Assessment of volunteers feeling (QoL)
Time Frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
MelasQoL (Melasma. Quality of Life Scale)
0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Assessment of volunteers feeling (QoL)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
MelasQoL (Melasma. Quality of Life Scale)
4 weeks
Assessment of volunteers feeling (QoL)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
MelasQoL (Melasma. Quality of Life Scale)
8 weeks
Evaluation of CRYOBEAUTY MAINS's performance
Time Frame: 0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment

Hexsel scoring:

  1. > Very significant clearance (about 90%); only minor evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  2. > Significant improvement (about 75%); some evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  3. > Intermediate between marked and slight improvement; about 50% improvement in the appearance of hyper pigmentation
  4. > Some improvement (about 25%); however, significant evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  5. > Hyperpigmentation has not changed since baseline
  6. > Worse (hyperpigmentation is worse than at baseline)
0 week : same-day following the CRYOBEAUTY MAINS treatment
Evaluation of CRYOBEAUTY MAINS's performance
Time Frame: 4 weeks

Hexsel scoring:

  1. > Very significant clearance (about 90%); only minor evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  2. > Significant improvement (about 75%); some evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  3. > Intermediate between marked and slight improvement; about 50% improvement in the appearance of hyper pigmentation
  4. > Some improvement (about 25%); however, significant evidence of hyper pigmentation remains
  5. > Hyperpigmentation has not changed since baseline
  6. > Worse (hyperpigmentation is worse than at baseline)
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Catherine Queille-Roussel, MD, CPCAD Nice

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 21, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2017-A00068-45

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Solar Lentigo

Clinical Trials on CRYOBEAUTY MAINS

3
Subscribe