Evaluation of a Simplified Strategy for the Long-term Management of HIV Infection (Simpl'HIV) (Simpl'HIV)

August 28, 2019 updated by: Calmy Alexandra

Evaluation of a Simplified Strategy for the Long-term Management of HIV Infection: a Non-inferiority, Randomized, Controlled, Open-label Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether maintenance antiretroviral therapy could be simplified to DTG + FTC dual therapy and/or patient-centered monitoring once virological suppression is achieved. Using a factorial design, the study aims to assess the efficacy of DTG + FTC dual therapy to maintain virological suppression through 48 weeks of follow-up as well as the costs of a patient-centered ART laboratory monitoring.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a pragmatic multicentre, 2x2 factorial randomized controlled trial with 1:1:1:1 randomization to switching to DTG-based maintenance dual therapy in association with FTC or continuation of cART, and to patient-centered monitoring or continuation of standard monitoring.

Patients will be followed during 48 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

186

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Basel, Switzerland
        • Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Basel
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Departement of Infectious Disease, Bern University Hospital
      • Genève, Switzerland
        • Infectious diseases consultation, University Hospitals of Geneva
      • Lausanne, Switzerland
        • Infectious Diseases Service, Lausanne University Hospital
      • Lugano, Switzerland
        • Department of Infectious Diseases, Lugano Regional Hospital
      • St. Gallen, Switzerland
        • Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, Kantonspital St.Gallen
      • Zürich, Switzerland
        • Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital of Zurich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Informed consent as documented by signature;
  2. Documented HIV-1 infection;
  3. Enrolled in the Swiss HIV Cohorte Study (SHCS) or receiving care from a medical doctor of the SHCS network;
  4. ≥ 18 years of age;
  5. HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL at screening and for at least 24 weeks before screening on effective suppressive cART, one blip with less than 200 copies/mL being allowed during this period if followed by at least 2 results < 50 copies/mL.
  6. On standard cART at the time of inclusion, i.e.:

    • 2 NRTIs + either 1 NNRTI, 1 boosted PI or 1 INSTI;
    • NRTI-sparing triple ARV regimen (e.g. 1 NRTI + 1 NNRTI + 1 InSTI);
    • Dual therapy with protease inhibitor.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. HIV-2 infection;
  2. Previous ART change for unsatisfactory virological response, i.e. slow initial virological suppression, incomplete suppression or rebound. Change of drug or drug class for convenience or toxic effect prevention or management is allowed.

    Note: patients with documented genotype(s) presenting only a M184V mutation remain eligible;

  3. Creatinine clearance < 50ml/min;
  4. ASAT or ALAT >2.5x upper limit of the norm;
  5. Known hypersensitivity, intolerance or allergy to DTG or FTC;
  6. Known or suspected non-adherence (defined as <80% adherence, i.e. missed doses > 1x/week) to current treatment in the last 6 months;
  7. Concomitant use of drugs that decrease DTG blood concentrations including carbamazepine, oxcarbamazepine, phenytoin, phenobarbital, St John's wort and rifampicin;
  8. Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding;
  9. a. Presence of any INSTI-resistance. Non-availability of INSTI resistance testing is NOT an exclusion criteria.

    b. Non availability of previous routine resistance test, at least for reverse transcriptase and protease genes.

    Note: Subjects remain eligible in the absence of any previous resistance test only if they are on their first-line antiretroviral regimen;

  10. Evidence of acute or chronic hepatitis B virus infection based on results of serology testing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Continuing cART + Standard monitoring
Patients randomized to this arm will continue their current standard ART regimen (cART) and will continue a standard 3-monthly routine safety biological monitoring (including CD4 cell count, fasting lipids and glucose, renal and hepatic function tests) at their SHCS site.
Experimental: Continuing cART + Patient-centered monitoring
Patients randomized to this arm will continue their current cART and will have immunological and safety blood examinations performed once per year and at least one options (decentralised venipuncture and blood tests, delivery of ARV drugs by mail and interview by phone or skype call) for weeks 6, 12 and 36
Immunological and safety blood examinations performed only once per year at least one options (decentralised venipuncture and blood tests, delivery of ARV drugs by mail and interview by phone or skype call) for weeks 6, 12 and 36
Experimental: Switch to DTG+FTC + Standard monitoring
Patients randomized to this arm will be switched to DTG + FTC dual maintenance therapy and will have immunological and safety blood examinations performed once per year and at least one options (decentralised venipuncture and blood tests, delivery of ARV drugs by mail and interview by phone or skype call) for weeks 6, 12 and 36
Switch from standard cART to DTG + FTC dual maintenance therapy.
Experimental: Switch to DTG+FTC + Patient-centered monitoring
Patients randomized to this arm will be switched to DTG + FTC dual maintenance therapy and will have immunological and safety blood examinations performed at screening and at week 48. In addition, patients will be ask to choose at least one of the following alternative options for weeks 6, 12 and 36: decentralised venipuncture and blood tests, delivery of ARV drugs by mail and Assessment and clinical interview by phone or skype call
Immunological and safety blood examinations performed only once per year at least one options (decentralised venipuncture and blood tests, delivery of ARV drugs by mail and interview by phone or skype call) for weeks 6, 12 and 36
Switch from standard cART to DTG + FTC dual maintenance therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of DTG-based maintenance therapy (< 100 copies/ml)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA <100 copies/ml throughout 48 weeks
48 weeks
Costs of a patient-centered ART monitoring
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Direct costs of the two study arms from the health care system perspective at week 48
48 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of DTG-based maintenance therapy (<50 copies/ml)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Proportion of patients maintaining HIV-RNA <50 copies/ml throughout 48 weeks
48 weeks
Efficacy of DTG-based therapy (<50 copies/ml) by FDA snapshot analysis
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Proportion of patients with HIV-RNA < 50 cp/ml at week 48
48 weeks
HIV-RNA >100 copies/ml as time to loss of virological response (TLOVR)
Time Frame: 48 weeks
defined as the first of the two-confirmed HIV-RNA >100 copies/ml (at least two weeks apart)
48 weeks
Change in CD4 cell count
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to week 48
48 weeks
Change in HIV-DNA
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to week 48
48 weeks
Change in lipidic profile
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to week 48
48 weeks
Change in glucose profile
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to week 48
48 weeks
Change in Framingham-calculated cardiovascular risk
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to week 48
48 weeks
Change in glomerular function rate
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to week 48
48 weeks
Proportion of patients with an adverse event
Time Frame: 48 weeks
throughout week 48
48 weeks
Proportion of patients with a severe adverse event
Time Frame: 48 weeks
throughout week 48
48 weeks
Proportion of patients with CNS adverse event
Time Frame: 48 weeks
throughout week 48
48 weeks
Proportion of patients new to DTG with CNS symptoms
Time Frame: 6 weeks
at 2 and 6 week
6 weeks
PROQOL questionnaire
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to weeks 12 and 48
48 weeks
Patient's monitoring satisfaction for pts in the patient-centered monitoring arm
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to weeks 24 and 48
48 weeks
Global satisfaction of the monitoring
Time Frame: 48 weeks
at week 48
48 weeks
Proportion of patients in the patient-centered monitoring arm expressing willingness to change monitoring options
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Monitoring satisfaction throughout 48 weeks
48 weeks
Patient's treatment satisfaction at week 48
Time Frame: 48 weeks
at week 48
48 weeks
ARV treatment in the post study
Time Frame: 48 weeks
ART decided to be used in the post study period
48 weeks
Study satisfaction
Time Frame: 48 weeks
at week 48
48 weeks
Cost-effectiveness of study arms
Time Frame: 48 weeks
at week 48
48 weeks
Change in patient weight
Time Frame: 48 weeks
from baseline to week 48
48 weeks
Adherence questions
Time Frame: 48 weeks
Patient adherence to treatment throughout 48 weeks of follow-up
48 weeks
Number of study-related extra clinical visits
Time Frame: 48 weeks
performed outside trial scheduled throughout 48 weeks
48 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 18, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 19, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Antiretroviral Therapy

Clinical Trials on Patient-centered monitoring

Subscribe