Facilitating Treatment Entry and Family Planning in Substance-using Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Mothers

November 17, 2020 updated by: Angela L Stotts, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Facilitating Treatment Entry and Family Planning in Substance-using NICU Mothers

The purpose of this pilot study is to assess whether the hospital-based, adaptive behavioral intervention strategy promotes treatment entry and reduces risk of additional substance-exposed pregnancies (SEPs), as well as HIV and Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) risks among substance-using NICU mothers. Additionally, to assess whether the intervention increases use of professional obstetrical/gynecological resources for contraception to reduce substance-exposed pregnancies (SEPs).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • have an infant in the NICU at Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital (CMHH)
  • have a positive urine drug screen at delivery or have an infant with a positive urine or meconium drug screen or self-reported drug use to a healthcare provider or had a documented positive drug screen during pregnancy
  • have access to a telephone.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • currently attending substance abuse treatment
  • severe cognitive, and/or psychiatric impairment, per judgment of NICU and research staff, that precludes cooperation with study protocol
  • inability to read, write, speak English or Spanish
  • inability or unwillingness to provide signed consent for participation; (5) inability or unwillingness to meet study requirements.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MI and ACT
Participants will receive behavioral therapy including Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).
Participants will receive Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT).
Active Comparator: Conventional Care
Conventional care from the hospital for NICU mothers who test positive for drug use, which includes visits and resources from hospital social workers.
Conventional care from the hospital for NICU mothers who test positive for drug use, which includes visits and resources from hospital social workers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Entry
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Number of participants having at least one treatment session at a licensed substance use facility or with a licensed counselor
8 weeks
Substance Exposed Pregnancy (SEP) risk as as assessed by a modified Time-Line Follow Back-SEP (TLFB-SEP)
Time Frame: 2 months
Substance Exposed Pregnancy (SEP) risk as as assessed by a modified Time-Line Follow Back-SEP (TLFB-SEP)
2 months
Substance Exposed Pregnancy (SEP) risk as as assessed by a modified Time-Line Follow Back-SEP (TLFB-SEP)
Time Frame: 6 months
Substance Exposed Pregnancy (SEP) risk as as assessed by a modified Time-Line Follow Back-SEP (TLFB-SEP)
6 months
HIV and HCV risk as assessed by Behavioral Risk Assessment for Infectious Disease (BRAID)
Time Frame: 2 months
HIV and HCV risk as assessed by Behavioral Risk Assessment for Infectious Disease (BRAID)
2 months
HIV and HCV risk as assessed by Behavioral Risk Assessment for Infectious Disease (BRAID)
Time Frame: 6 months
HIV and HCV risk as assessed by Behavioral Risk Assessment for Infectious Disease (BRAID)
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 2 months
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
2 months
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
Time Frame: 6 months
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
6 months
Current position regarding motivation for change as assessed by the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA)
Time Frame: 2 months
Current position regarding motivation for change as assessed by the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA)
2 months
Current position regarding motivation for change as assessed by the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA)
Time Frame: 6 months
Current position regarding motivation for change as assessed by the University of Rhode Island Change Assessment (URICA)
6 months
Psychological flexibility as assessed by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Substance Abuse (AAQ-SA)
Time Frame: 2 months
This self-report measure of psychological flexibility will assess a participant's willingness to have undesirable thoughts and feelings related to drug use while still pursuing self-identified goals. This version of the AAQ was specifically developed for substance-abusing populations.
2 months
Psychological flexibility as assessed by the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Substance Abuse (AAQ-SA)
Time Frame: 6 months
This self-report measure of psychological flexibility will assess a participant's willingness to have undesirable thoughts and feelings related to drug use while still pursuing self-identified goals. This version of the AAQ was specifically developed for substance-abusing populations.
6 months
Number of participants whose infant had routine follow-up pediatric appointments
Time Frame: 6 months
Medical records will be used, with participant consent, to assess the number of participants whose infant had routine follow-up pediatric appointments.
6 months
Number of participants whose infant had acute care visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Medical records will be used, with participant consent, to assess the number of participants whose infant had acute care visits.
6 months
Number of participants whose infant had emergency department visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Medical records will be used, with participant consent, to assess the number of participants whose infant had emergency department visits.
6 months
Number of participants whose infant was re-hospitalized
Time Frame: 6 months
Medical records will be used, with participant consent, to assess the number of participants whose infant was re-hospitalized.
6 months
Number of participants who lost custody of the infant
Time Frame: 6 months
Medical records will be used, with participant consent, and additionally the research team will collaborate with the NICU social worker and the assigned child protective services (CPS) caseworker, with participant consent, to obtain information about the number of participants who lost custody of the infant.
6 months
Number of participants for which any additional abuse or neglect complaints were filed after baseline
Time Frame: 6 months
Medical records will be used, with participant consent, and additionally the research team will collaborate with the NICU social worker and the assigned child protective services (CPS) caseworker, with participant consent, to obtain information about the number of participants for which any additional abuse or neglect complaints were filed after baseline.
6 months
Drug use
Time Frame: 2 months
Number of participant who test positive for drug use as assessed by urine drug screen
2 months
Drug use
Time Frame: 6 months
Number of participant who test positive for drug use as assessed by urine drug screen
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Angela Stotts, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 5, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

January 3, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-15-0990
  • R34DA041465 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use Disorders

Clinical Trials on Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT)

3
Subscribe