Efficacy of an Intra-articular Injection of Botulinum Toxin A Associated With Splinting for Base-of-thumb Osteoarthritis (RHIBOT)

Short-term Efficacy of a Single Ultrasound-guided Intra-articular Injection of Botulinum Toxin A Associated With Splinting for Base-of-thumb Osteoarthritis: a Randomized Controlled Double-blind Pilot Study

The primary purpose of this study is to determine whether a single ultrasound-guided intra-articular injection of botulinum toxin A associated to splinting is effective in reducing pain at 3 months in base-of-thumb osteoarthritis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Base-of-thumb osteoarthritis is a common condition affecting middle-age persons. Base-of-thumb osteoarthritis induces pain and hand-specific limitations in activities. For short and midterm effects, therapeutic options usually include splinting, exercise therapy and intra-articular injections of glucocorticoids or hyaluronic acid. However, evidence of efficacy of intra-articular therapies in base-of-thumb osteoarthritis and international guidelines are inconsistent. Recently, the use of intra-articular botulinum toxin A as a pain killer has raised intense interest. The exact mechanisms of pain modulation by botulinum toxin A in osteoarthritis are unclear. It has been suggested that botulinum toxin A could directly reduce peripheral sensitization and indirectly reduce central sensitization. Indeed, recent studies suggest an inhibitory role of botulinum toxin A on the release of mediators involved in nociception, such as P substance, calcitonin gene-related peptide and glutamate. Open and randomized controlled trials of botulinum toxin A in knee osteoarthritis support short to mid-term positive clinical effects on pain. However, no study has reported results for base-of-thumb osteoarthritis

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75014
        • Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Service de Rééducation et de Réadaptation de l'Appareil Locomoteur et des Pathologies du Rachis, Hôpital Cochin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Pain intensity on a self-administered 11-point pain numeric rating scale ≥ 30
  • Pain involving the base-of-thumb
  • X-ray evidence of base-of-thumb osteoarthritis with at least 2 of the 4 following items involving the trapeziometacarpal joint : osteophytes, joint space narrowing, subchondral bone sclerosis or subchondral cysts
  • 1990 American College of Rheumatology classification criteria for hand osteoarthritis adapted to base-of-thumb osteoarthritis
  • Medical examination
  • Written consent
  • Health insurance
  • For women of childbearing age, a negative urinary pregnancy test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of thumb surgery
  • History of inflammatory or crystal-associated rheumatic disease
  • Neurological disorders involving the hands other than carpien canal syndrom
  • Collagen disorders involving the hands : Dupuytren, Marfan or Ehlers-Danlos diseases
  • Osteoarthritis predominating at the scaphotrapezial joint on X-Ray
  • Hand or wrist trauma ≤ 2 months
  • Hand or wrist intra-articular injections ≤ 2 months
  • Contra-indication to botulinum toxin A injection or to splinting
  • Cognitive or behavioral disorders making the assessment impossible
  • Participant unable to speak, read and write french
  • Bilateral BTOA without predominant symptomatic side
  • Pregnancy and breast feeding
  • Persons referred to in Articles L 1121-5; 6; 8; 9 of the Public Health Code (protected minors or adults, guardianship or trusteeship, etc.)
  • Patient with epilepsy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intra-articular botulinum toxin A and splinting
Ultrasound-guided injection of 50 Allergan Unities of botulinum toxin A (Botox®, Allergan) resuspended in 1 ml of saline in the trapeziometacarpal joint and custom-made thermoformed plastic splint to be worn for 48 hours after intra-articular injection then nightly
Ultrasound-guided injection of 50 Allergan Unities of botulinum toxin A (Botox®, Allergan) resuspended in 1 ml of saline in the trapeziometacarpal joint and custom-made thermoformed plastic splint to be worn for 48 hours after intra-articular injection then nightly
Other Names:
  • Allergan
  • Botox®
Active Comparator: Intra-articular saline and splinting
Ultrasound-guided injection of 1 ml of saline in the trapeziometacarpal joint and custom-made thermoformed plastic splint to be worn for 48 hours after intra-articular injection then nightly
Ultrasound-guided injection of 1 ml of saline in the trapeziometacarpal joint and custom-made thermoformed plastic splint to be worn for 48 hours after intra-articular injection then nightly

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in base-of-thumb pain 3 months post-injection
Time Frame: 3 months post injection
Mean change from baseline in average base-of-thumb pain intensity in the previous 48 hrs on a self-administered 11-point pain numeric rating scale (0 no pain - 100 maximal pain)
3 months post injection

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in base-of-thumb pain 1 month post-injection
Time Frame: 1 month post injection
Mean change from baseline in average base-of-thumb pain intensity in the previous 48 hrs on a self-administered 11-point pain numeric rating scale (0 no pain - 100 maximal pain)
1 month post injection
Change in base-of-thumb pain 6 months post-injection
Time Frame: 6 months post injection
Mean change from baseline in average base-of-thumb pain intensity in the previous 48 hrs on a self-administered 11-point pain numeric rating scale (0 no pain - 100 maximal pain)
6 months post injection
Change in hand function 3 months post-injection
Time Frame: 3 months post injection
Mean change from baseline in average hand-specific limitations in activities in the previous 2 weeks on the self-administered Cochin Hand Function Scale (0 no limitations - 90 maximal limitations)
3 months post injection
Change in hand function 6 months post-injection
Time Frame: 6 months post injection
Mean change from baseline in average hand-specific limitations in activities in the previous 2 weeks on the self-administered Cochin Hand Function Scale (0 no limitations - 90 maximal limitations)
6 months post injection
Change in patient's global assessment 3 months post-injection
Time Frame: 3 months post-injection
Mean change from baseline in patient's global assessment on a self-administered 11-point numeric rating scale (0 worst possible - 100 best possible)
3 months post-injection
Change in patient's global assessment 6 months post-injection
Time Frame: 6 months post-injection
Mean change from baseline in patient's global assessment on a self-administered 11-point numeric rating scale (0 worst possible - 100 best possible)
6 months post-injection
Percentage of OARSI responders 3 months post-injection
Time Frame: 3 months post-injection
OARSI response is defined as an improvement in pain (0 to 100 numeric rating scale) or in function (0 to 90 Cochin Hand Function Scale) ≥ 50% and absolute change ≥ 20/100 on pain numeric rating scale or ≥ 9/90 on Cochin Hand Function Scale respectively , or improvement in at least 2 of the 3 following items: 1/ pain ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 10/100, 2/ function ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 9/90, 3/ patient's global assessment (0 to 100 numeric rating scale) ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 10/100
3 months post-injection
Percentage of OARSI responders 6 months post-injection
Time Frame: 6 months post-injection
OARSI response is defined as an improvement in pain (0 to 100 numeric rating scale) or in function (0 to 90 Cochin Hand Function Scale) ≥ 50% and absolute change ≥ 20/100 on pain numeric rating scale or ≥ 9/90 on Cochin Hand Function Scale respectively , or improvement in at least 2 of the 3 following items: 1/ pain ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 10/100, 2/ function ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 9/90, 3/ patient's global assessment (0 to 100 numeric rating scale) ≥ 20% and absolute change ≥ 10/100
6 months post-injection
Analgesics consumption at 3 months
Time Frame: from injection to 3 months post-injection
Self-reported consumption of analgesics (non-opioid, weak and strong opioids) using a self-administered 4-class scale (never; several times a month; several times a week; daily)
from injection to 3 months post-injection
Analgesics consumption at 6 months
Time Frame: from 3 to 6 months post-injection
Self-reported consumption of analgesics (non-opioid, weak and strong opioids) using a self-administered 4-class scale (never; several times a month; several times a week; daily)
from 3 to 6 months post-injection
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs consumption at 3 months
Time Frame: from injection to 3 months post-injection
Self-reported consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs using a self-administered 4-class scale (never; several times a month; several times a week; daily)
from injection to 3 months post-injection
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs consumption at 6 months
Time Frame: from 3 to 6 months post-injection
Self-reported consumption of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs using a self-administered 4-class scale (never; several times a month; several times a week; daily)
from 3 to 6 months post-injection

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: François RANNOU, MD, PhD, AP-HP , université Paris Descartes
  • Principal Investigator: Christelle NGUYEN, MD, PhD, AP-HP, université Paris Descartes

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 29, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 13, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 30, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 26, 2021

Last Verified

June 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Base-of-thumb Osteoarthritis

Clinical Trials on botulinum toxin A

3
Subscribe