Clinical Study of TripleA for Treatment of Alcohol Addiction in Outpatient Care

December 9, 2021 updated by: Kontigo Care AB

Clinical Study of TripleA Connected to Diagnosis, Care and Aftercare of Alcohol Addiction in Outpatient Care

The primary objective is to investigate differences in the alcohol consumption pattern between alcohol addicts receiving conventional treatment and those who receive a combination of conventional treatment and TripleA.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study is a 12-month open-label and randomised comparison between the control group receiving only conventional treatment and the intervention group receiving conventional treatment enhanced with TripleA.

The studies have been designed to reflect as far as possible the conventional care for alcohol dependence. The TripleA product is intended to strengthen the existing methods used during the assessment phase, treatment phase and aftercare of alcohol dependence.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

115

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in care at Addiction and Neuropsychiatry Uppsala University Hospital and at Nämndemansgården Uppsala
  • 18 years or older
  • Meets at least 2 of the criteria for addiction/substance syndrome according to Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders-5 (DSM-5)
  • Ability to understand and communicate in Swedish
  • Ability to handle the technical equipment used in the study (alcoholometer and Smartphone)
  • Access to a fixed place (living, place for sleeping, place where the phone can be charged

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Schizophrenia
  • Substance syndrome related to other substances than alcohol and nicotin
  • Lowered lung function (not able to reach acceptable expiration volume for the alcoholometer function)
  • The patient is taken care of within the frame for The Act on Care of Addicts
  • Not suitable to participate according to the Investigator
  • Has not consumed any alcohol during the 4 weeks defined as baseline timeline follow back
  • Normalized Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin (CDT) and Phosphatidyl-Ethanol (PEth)-values in blood samples at visit 1

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Conventional treatment and TripleA
Conventional treatment and TripleA medical device consisting of alcoholometer, a Bluetooth mobile app on cell phone and information stored on computer for caregiver
NO_INTERVENTION: Conventional treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients With no Heavy Drinking Days After 12 Months
Time Frame: Four weeks period before the 12 months visit
Difference between the treatment arms in percentage of patients with no heavy drinking days during the 4-weeks period before the 12 months follow-up visit .
Four weeks period before the 12 months visit

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Sober Patients During the Period Before the 6 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the 6 months visit
Difference in percentage of sober patients (zero drinks during one month reporting period) during the four weeks period before the 6 months visit.
The four weeks-period before the 6 months visit
Percentage of Sober Patients Before the 12 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the 12 months visit
Percentage of sober patients (zero drinks during one month reporting period) during the four weeks period before the 12 months visit.
The four weeks-period before the 12 months visit
Change in Total Amount of Consumed Alcohol From the Baseline Visit to the 6 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Number of drinks during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of drinks during the 4 weeks period before the 6 months visit. A positive difference means a reduction in drinking. A negative difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Change in Total Amount of Consumed Alcohol From the Baseline Visit to the12 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Number of drinks during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of drinks during the 4 weeks period before the 12 months visit. A positive difference means a reduction in drinking. A negative difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Change in Heavy Alcohol Drinking Days From the Baseline Visit to the 6 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Number of heavy drinking days during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of heavy drinking days during the 4 weeks period before the 6 months visit. A positive difference means a reduction in drinking. A negative difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Change in Heavy Alcohol Drinking Days From the Baseline Visit to the 12 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Number of heavy drinking days during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of heavy drinking days during the 4 weeks period before the 12 months visit. A positive difference means a reduction in drinking. A negative difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Change in Number of Sober Days Before the Baseline Visit Compared to the 6 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Number of sober days during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of sober days during the 4 weeks period before the 6 months visit. A negative difference means a reduction in drinking. A positive difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Change in Number of Sober Days Before the Baseline Visit Compared to Before the 12 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Number of sober days during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of sober days during the 4 weeks period before the 12 months visit. A negative difference means a reduction in drinking. A positive difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Change in Number of Standard Glasses Per Drinking Day Before the Baseline Visit Compared to Before the 6 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Number of standard glasses/drinks per drinking day during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of standard glasses/drinks per drinking day during the 4 weeks period before the 6 months visit. A positive difference means a reduction in drinking. A negative difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 6 months visit
Change in Number of Standard Glasses Before the Baseline Visit Comapred to Before the 12 Months Visit
Time Frame: The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Number of standard glasses/drinks per drinking day during the 4 weeks period before the baseline visit minus number of standard glasses/drinks per drinking day during the 4 weeks period before the 12 months visit. A positive difference means a reduction in drinking. A negative difference means increased drinking.
The four weeks-period before the baseline visit and before the 12 months visit
Time to Heavy Drinking
Time Frame: From date of randomization until the date of first heavy drinking day, assessed up to 12 months
Time period in days from randomization to first heavy drinking day. Longer time means a better result.
From date of randomization until the date of first heavy drinking day, assessed up to 12 months
Change in Health Outcome, Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS) in EQ-5D at the Baseline Visit Compared to the 6 Months Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, After 6 months
Change in health outcome, measured with the visual analog scale (EQ VAS) in EQ-5D after 6 months compared to baseline. The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring and describing health outcomes. VAS score is 0-100 where 0 is the worst possible health and 100 is the best possible health. A positive difference indicates improvement.
Baseline, After 6 months
Change in Health Outcome, Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS) in EQ-5D From the Baseline Visit Compared to the 12 Months Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, After 12 months
Change in health outcome, measured with the visual analog scale (EQ VAS) in EQ-5D after12 months compared to baseline. The EQ-5D is a standardized instrument for measuring and describing health outcomes. VAS score is 0-100 where 0 is the worst possible health and 100 is the best possible health. A positive number indicates improvement.
Baseline, After 12 months
Change in Health Outcome Measured With the Questionnaire in EQ5D After 6 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, After 6 months
Change in health outcome, measured with the questionnaire in EQ-5D after 6 months compared to baseline. The questionnaire EQ-5D in EQ-5D consists of 5 questions giving score 5 - 15. A higher positive number indicates improvement.
Baseline, After 6 months
Change in Health Outcome, Measured With the Questionnaire in EQ-5D After 12 Months Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, After 12 months
Change in health outcome, measured with the questionnaire in EQ-5D after 12 months minus baseline. The questionnaire EQ-5D in EQ-5D consists of 5 questions giving score 5 - 15. A higher positive number indicates improvement.
Baseline, After 12 months
Percentage of Patients Who Have Reduced Their AUDIT Score After 12 Months
Time Frame: After 12 months
Percentage of patients who have reduced their AUDIT score (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, score 0-40) after 12 months. Higher proportion is better.
After 12 months
Percentage of Patients With Lowered AUDIT Score With at Least One Zone After 12 Months
Time Frame: After 12 months
Percentage of patients who have reduced their Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) risk zones with at least one zone. Higher proportion is better.
After 12 months
Percentage of Patients Having a Risk Level <II (i.e. Less Than 6 AUDIT Points for Women, 8 AUDIT Points for Men) After 12 Months
Time Frame: After 12 months
Percentage of patients having a risk level <II (i.e. less than Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) points, i.e. 6 points for women, 8 points for men) after 12 months. Higher proportion is better.
After 12 months
Change in Degree of Alcohol Dependence Measured as the Difference in SADD-points at Baseline Compared to 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, After 6 months
Change in degree of alcohol dependence measured as the difference in Short Alcohol Dependence Data (SADD)-points at baseline minus 6 months Scoring: The 15 items summed for a total score than can range from 0 to 45. Scale totals are interpreted as follows: 1-9 low dependence, 10-19 medium dependence, and 20 or greater high dependence. A large positive number indicates a better result.
Baseline, After 6 months
Change in Degree of Alcohol Dependence Measured as the Difference in SADD-points at Baseline Compared to 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, After 12 months
Change in degree of alcohol dependence measured as the difference in Short Alcohol Dependence Data (SADD)-points at baseline minus 12 months. Scoring: The 15 items summed for a total score than can range from 0 to 45. Scale totals are interpreted as follows: 1-9 low dependence, 10-19 medium dependence, and 20 or greater high dependence. A large positive number indicates a better result.
Baseline, After 12 months
Compliance With Agreed Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline, After 12 months
Percentage of subjects staying in the study to the 12 months visit.
Baseline, After 12 months
Change in Concentration of the Alcohol Metabolite PEth at Baseline Compared to 6 Months Visit
Time Frame: Baseline, After 6 months
Change in concentration of the alcohol metabolite PEth at baseline minus 6 months. A larger positive change of PEth concentration is a better outcome.
Baseline, After 6 months
Change in Concentration of the Alcohol Metabolite PEth at Baseline Compared to 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, After 12 months
Change in concentration of the alcohol metabolite PEth at baseline minus 12 months. A larger positive change of PEth concentration is a better outcome.
Baseline, After 12 months
Change in Concentration of the Alcohol Metabolite CDT in the Blood at Baseline Compared to 6 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, After 6 months
CDT (Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin) concentration is given in % of total transferrin in serum, i e. CDT(%). The change is calculated as baseline CDT (%) minus CDT(%) at 6 months. A large positive difference indicates decreased drinking.
Baseline, After 6 months
Change in Concentration of the Alcohol Metabolite CDT in the Blood at Baseline Compared to 12 Months
Time Frame: Baseline, After 12 months
CDT (Carbohydrate Deficient Transferrin) concentration is given in % of total transferrin in serum, i e. CDT(%). The change is calculated as baseline CDT (%) minus CDT(%) at 12 months. A large positive difference indicates decreased drinking.
Baseline, After 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tobias Eriksson, MD PhD, Uppsala University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 15, 2018

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

June 22, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 13, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2021

Last Verified

November 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcoholism

3
Subscribe