Perflutren Protein-Type A Microspheres and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Improving Response to Radioembolization Therapy in Patients With Liver Cancer

March 29, 2024 updated by: john eisenbrey, Thomas Jefferson University

Ultrasound Microbubble Destruction and Perfusion Quantification for Improving Radioembolization Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This phase II trial studies how well perflutren protein-type A microspheres and contrast-enhanced ultrasound work in improving response to radioembolization therapy in patients with liver cancer. Ultrasound contrast agents, such as perflutren protein-type A microspheres, use gas microbubbles to improve image quality. Using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging will "pop" these microbubbles and cause tumors to become more sensitive to radiation therapies.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Characterize the ability of localized ultrasound contrast agent destruction to improve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) response to yttrium Y-90 (Y90) radioembolization.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:

I. Determine if contrast-enhanced ultrasound estimated tumor perfusion can reliably predict HCC response to radioembolization 1-14 days post treatment.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 groups.

GROUP I: Patients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres intravenously (IV) over 10 minutes and undergo contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) over 60 minutes at 1-6 hours and at approximately 7 and 14 days after yttrium Y-90 radioembolization.

GROUP II: Patients undergo standard of care yttrium Y-90 radioembolization.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month and at 3-4 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

104

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be scheduled for sub-lobar radioembolization therapy of a previously untreated HCC mass < 6 cm visible on grayscale ultrasound
  • Be medically stable
  • If a female of child-bearing age, have a negative pregnancy test prior to each ultrasound exam
  • Have signed informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Females who are pregnant or nursing
  • Patients who are medically unstable, patients who are seriously or terminally ill, and patients whose clinical course is unpredictable; for example:

    • Patients on life support or in a critical care unit
    • Patients with unstable occlusive disease (e.g., crescendo angina)
    • Patients with clinically unstable cardiac arrhythmias, such as recurrent ventricular tachycardia
    • Patients with uncontrolled congestive heart failure (New York heart Association [NYHA] class IV)
  • Patients with recent cerebral hemorrhage
  • Patients with known sensitivities to albumin, blood, or blood products
  • Patients with known hypersensitivity to perflutren
  • Patients with known cardiac shunts
  • Patients with known congenital heart defects
  • Patients with severe emphysema, pulmonary vasculitis, or a history of pulmonary embolism
  • Patients with respiratory distress syndrome
  • Patients with a history of bleeding disorders
  • Patients with bilirubin levels > 2 mg/dL

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group I (perflutren protein-type A microspheres, CEUS)
Patients receive perflutren protein-type A microspheres IV over 10 minutes and undergo CEUS over 60 minutes at 1-6 hours and at approximately 7 and 14 days after yttrium Y-90 radioembolization.
Undergo CEUS
Undergo standard of care Y-90 radioembolization
Other Names:
  • Yttrium Y 90 Microsphere Therapy
  • Yttrium-90 Radioembolization
Given IV.
Other Names:
  • Optison
Active Comparator: Group II (standard of care)
Patients undergo standard of care yttrium Y-90 radioembolization.
Undergo standard of care Y-90 radioembolization
Other Names:
  • Yttrium Y 90 Microsphere Therapy
  • Yttrium-90 Radioembolization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment response to yttrium Y-90 radioembolization
Time Frame: Up to 4 months
Measured using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Will be tested with a non-parametric Mann- Whitney U-test of the difference in response distributions between control (radioembolization alone) and experimental group (ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction [UTMD] + radioembolization). The outcome variable in this analysis, the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) score, is treated as an ordinal variable in this analysis.
Up to 4 months
Tumor perfusion measured by contrast-enhanced ultrasound between ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction pulses
Time Frame: Up to 14 days
Perfusion will be characterized in terms of contrast replenishment time intensity curves fit with a 2-parameter exponential recovery curve. The relationship between the normalized perfusion values from this image processing and the patients' subsequent mRECIST scores in the UTMD + radioembolization group will be evaluated with Spearman's rank order correlation.
Up to 14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Eisenbrey, PhD, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 27, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 22, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging

3
Subscribe