A New APPROACH to HIV Testing: Adaptation of POCT for Pharmacies to Reduce Risk and Optimize Access to Care in HIV (APPROACH)

May 6, 2020 updated by: Deborah Kelly, Memorial University of Newfoundland

A New APPROACH to HIV Testing: Adaptation of POCT for Pharmacies to Reduce Risk and Optimize Access to Care in HIV - A Type II Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study

An estimated 21% of Canadians with HIV are unaware of their infection. There is a need to improve access to HIV testing to detect infections earlier so individuals can access care early and take steps to prevent transmission to others. Barriers to HIV testing include limited access or reluctance to go to traditional testing sites (doctor's offices and sexually transmitted infection clinics), and the lengthy wait time to receive test results from standard laboratory-based HIV testing (usually 1-2 weeks). These deterrents are particularly significant for those at highest risk of infection, who may be socially marginalized or stigmatized. In rural areas, HIV testing may only be available through doctor's offices and hospitals, yet many Canadians do not have access to a family physician. Pharmacists are among the most trusted and accessible healthcare providers, and are well positioned to improve access to HIV testing. Point of care tests for HIV are easy to administer and results are available within minutes, making them ideal for use in the community pharmacy setting. Point of care testing (POCT) by pharmacists can ensure individuals receive their test results, and facilitate timely linkages to care and treatment. This adaptation grant will look at factors influencing the acceptability and feasibility of pharmacist-provided rapid POCT for HIV in two Canadian provinces, including pharmacies in both urban and rural areas. The effectiveness of pharmacist-delivered POCT will be considered from a variety of perspectives including people living with or at risk of HIV, as well as pharmacists as the service providers.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: There is a need to improve access to HIV testing to detect infections earlier so individuals can access care and prevent transmission. Barriers to testing include limited access or reluctance to go to traditional testing sites, and the lengthy wait time to receive results. Pharmacists are trusted, accessible health providers and are well positioned to offer HIV testing. Point of care tests (POCT) for HIV are easy to administer and results available within minutes, making them ideal for use in the pharmacy setting. HIV POCT may overcome barriers to standard testing for those at high risk and in healthcare resource-limited settings. Preliminary data suggest pharmacist-administered POCT can reach those who have never had an HIV test. Implementation and effectiveness of pharmacist-delivered POCT is the focus of this study. Study goals: To determine whether a multi-faceted HIV POCT program adapted for community pharmacies in two Canadian provinces is acceptable, feasible and effective in reaching those at high risk and those who have never been tested. Implementation and effectiveness of an integrated, contextualized model of HIV POCT in urban and rural pharmacies in Newfoundland (NL) and Alberta (AB) will be assessed. Participant characteristics, responses to satisfaction measures on the participant questionnaire, and pharmacist time to offer HIV POCT were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Pre-testing questionnaire data was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. ANOVA was used to assess differences in participants' Denver HIV Risk Scores between provinces, and urban versus rural testing sites, and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) was used to assess differences in participant satisfaction with the testing experience based on province, urban/rural testing site, sex, and history of prior HIV testing. Fisher's Exact tests were used to assess whether history of prior HIV testing depended on province or urban/rural centre for testing. Qualitative data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach. Interview transcripts and extensive field notes were included for analysis from the participant interviews and pharmacist focus groups. Transcripts from participant interviews were coded using an open or emergent scheme where codes were developed and modified throughout the coding process. Descriptive codes were assigned to identify recurring concepts, and sub-themes were then identified and. Themes from the pharmacist focus groups were considered according to the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behaviour (COM-B) model to understand behaviour change, which considers opportunities and challenges in the context of professional capability, opportunity, and motivation to offer the HIV POCT program. Impact: This study will inform further modifications to the pharmacy HIV POCT model to optimize effectiveness and increase scalability prior to full adoption and implementation. This will form the basis for a subsequent grant application. Knowledge gained can be used to scale up effective testing programs to increase the number of high risk individuals getting tested. The pharmacy is a novel venue to offer HIV testing, and if successful could be a widely accessible option applicable to other provinces and other countries. This study will provide proof of concept for pharmacy based POCT for other sexually transmitted and blood-borne infections (STBBI) (once tests become available) and successful implementation may also lead to pharmacist-delivered pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) programs, to further reduce HIV infection rates.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

123

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada, A1A 0L1
        • School of Pharmacy, Memorial University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consistent with current testing guidelines and the National HIV POCT Action Plan HIV testing will be offered to anyone age 18+ who requests a test and is not known to be HIV+.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anyone unwilling to sign the consent form will be unable to participate in the study or receive HIV POCT.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SCREENING
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
OTHER: Patients requesting a HIV screening test
Using a Type II hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness study design investigators will assess the implementation and effectiveness of a multi-faceted, integrated, contextualized model of HIV POCT in pharmacies in urban and rural settings in NL and AB, Canada. This design will be flexible, responsive and capable of capturing changing elements at multiple points in time. A mixed methods approach will be used to assess Implementation and Effectiveness aims.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patients Requesting a Rapid HIV Test at a Community Pharmacy Study Site
Time Frame: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)
Number of patients who presented to a community pharmacy test site and requested a rapid HIV test.
Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)
Number of Reactive Test Results
Time Frame: Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)
Number of patients who requested a rapid HIV test at a community pharmacy and received a reactive test result
Collected at the end of the study period (6-8 months)
Total Time Required for the HIV Testing Process
Time Frame: From time of participant consenting through to providing pre-test counseling, administering the test & explaining the result, post-test counseling, & referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated, 30-40 minutes on average
This was the time of the total patient pharmacist interaction, which began with the pharmacist explaining the study and ended with referring the patient for additional sexually transmitted blood borne infections (STBBI) counselling. The entire testing process included time spent explaining the study and consenting the participant, providing pre-test counselling, administering the test and explaining the result, post-test counselling, and referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated.
From time of participant consenting through to providing pre-test counseling, administering the test & explaining the result, post-test counseling, & referring the participant for additional STBBI testing as indicated, 30-40 minutes on average
Participant Satisfaction With Testing Experience
Time Frame: Completed immediately after each individual participants testing process was completed, approximately 10 minutes on average

Once the testing was completed (see Outcome 3) prior to leaving, participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire which assessed perception of the testing experience including factors that influenced their decision to be tested at the pharmacy & whether they would have sought HIV testing elsewhere if not at the pharmacy.

Information was captured using a percentage continuous response scale from 0 to 100%. Participants were instructed to answer the questions by marking an "x" on the line at the point which represented their experience. For example, in response to the question "How likely are you to buy a lottery ticket today?", the participant was instructed that if they were 50% certain, they would mark an "x" at the 50% notch on the line.

Questions were positively worded, with higher scores indicating higher agreement.

Not all patients answered all questions; reported data is based on the number of respondents for each question.

Completed immediately after each individual participants testing process was completed, approximately 10 minutes on average
Participants Self-identified HIV Risk Behaviours
Time Frame: Immediately prior to testing process, participant completed the survey, approximately 5 - 10 minutes on average

Prior to initiating the testing process participants were asked to complete a de-identified, blinded questionnaire that included demographic data (age, gender, ethnicity, relationship status, highest education attained, and income level) as well as information about HIV risk factors and previous HIV testing history.

Pre-testing questionnaire data on HIV risk factors was used to calculate a Denver HIV Risk Score (www.denverptc.org/resource.php?id=33) for each participant, as a means to predict their probability of having an undiagnosed HIV infection. Patients who score 30 points or greater on the Denver HIV Risk Score are considered at increased risk of undiagnosed HIV infection and should be offered routine screening.

Not all patients answered all questions; numbers of respondents for each question is provided.

Immediately prior to testing process, participant completed the survey, approximately 5 - 10 minutes on average

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

February 14, 2017

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2017

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2017

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 7, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

3
Subscribe