Neuroplasticity in Parkinson´s Disease After Training (BETA-PD)

February 14, 2025 updated by: Erika Franzén, Karolinska Institutet

Effects of the HiBalance-program: Linking Clinical Signs and Symptoms to Changes in the Brain in People With Parkinson´s Disease

This project aims to determine the effects of the HiBalance program on neuroplastic changes in people with mild to moderate Parkinson´s disease. The main hypothesis is that highly challenging exercise will lead to greater gait and balance ability, increased levels of physical activity and an improved health related quality of life. The investigators further hypothesize that neuroplasticity changes will be seen in corresponding areas of the brain, neuropsychological changes on cognitive test measures, and that exercise will inhibit the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the brain through the mediation of neurotrophic factors.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disease affecting many physiological systems essential for balance control. New findings suggest that intensive, challenging and cognitively demanding exercises could induce neuroplasticity in PD. A new balance training (the HiBalance program) have therefore been developed; emphasizing critical aspects of balance control through highly challenging and progressive exercises incorporating dual/multi-tasking (Conradsson et al, 2012). In an RCT, the HiBalance-program was shown to improve balance, gait and physical activity level in favor for the training group (Conradsson et al, 2015). In this proposal the investigators will combine physiotherapy, neurology and neuroimaging to characterise and determine the effects on physical and cognitive symptoms as well as structural and functional changes and wet biomarkers in the brain after the training.

Participants will be recruited through Karolinska University Hospital and via announcements in relevant forums like for instance the Swedish Parkinson Association. According to earlier power calculations for detecting effects in balance and gait measures after this particular intervention, the investigators anticipate 40 to 50 participants in each group to detect significant changes.

The investigators will perform both per protocol analysis and intention to treat analysis using mixed model or repeated measurement ANOVAs if the data is normally distributed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Huddinge, Sweden, 14183
        • Karolinska Institutet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

56 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson´s disease
  • Hoehn & Yahr 2-3
  • ≥ 60 years of age
  • Be able to ambulate indoors without mobility aid
  • Balance impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • =< 21 points on MoCA
  • Other medical conditions that could substantially influence balance performance, voice or speech performance or participation in the interventions
  • Participating in an intensive exercise program for balance or speech during the last six months.

Additional exclusion criteria for the brain imaging will include the presence of; pacemakers, deep brain stimulators or other MRI incompatible implants, claustrophobia, inability to hear instructions without hearing aid, unilateral or bilateral blindness, severe diplopia, tremor, dyskinesia or dystonia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HiBalance
The HiBalance program is based on scientifically well-established principles of exercise training and postural control as well as current research on training in PD. The training will be conducted as a progressive individually adjusted group program in order to challenge the specific balance disorder of every participant and endorse progression. The intervention will be performed for an hour, 2 times/week in groups of six to eight participants for a total of 10 weeks and one home training session on their own.
Intervention of highly challenging balance training for 10 weeks.
Active Comparator: Speech therapy
The control group will receive a group treatment (2 times/w for 10 w + 1 home training session) consisting of speech and communication therapy performed by a speech therapist. This intervention will be performed in a sitting position. The speech and communication treatment will aim at increasing vocal loudness and improving articulatory precision. Level of difficulty is gradually increased by progressing from using loud voice and clear speech in short and automatized utterances, to using the same technique in more complex sentences and situations. The group format is used to practice techniques in communicative situations and also to introduce increasing level of multitasking by combining speech training with cognitively more challenging tasks in the group training.
Intervention conducted by speech and language therapist for 10 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mini-BESTest
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test a rating scale for dynamic balance incorporating 14 different balance and gait items that were assessed by a physical therapist on a scale from 0-2. Maximum points 28.

0-28 points with higher scores indicating better balance control

Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait Parameters
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Gait speed in m/sec
Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Neuropsychological Tests
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Composite measure of executive functions of four tests:

  1. letter fluency
  2. the verbal fluency test: category switching
  3. the colour-word interference test: switch condition (Test 1, 2 and 3 from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System)
  4. the digit span total score (from Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale)

First, the scores of each of the four tests were standardised into z-scores using pre-scores. Models using different test were compared. The model including all four tests and using the robust diagonally weighted least square estimation was chosen based on fit values. Factor loadings of the model: verbal fluency = 1.000, the verbal fluency test: category switching= 0.887, the colour-word interference test: switch condition= -0.855, the digit span total score= 0.813. Last, the z-scores of each test and person were multiplied with the factor loadings and added together to create a sum score for each person and time point. A higher value = greater executive functions

Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Quality of Life Questionnaires
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) assesses how often people with Parkinson's experience difficulties across 8 dimensions of daily living (mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communications and bodily discomfort).

The sum score is as a percentage score ranging between 0 and 100. Higher is better

Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS)
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Disease severity/symtoms in Parkinson's disease, Movement Disorder Society - Unified Parkinsons disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS) Total score.

Higher score is worse, ranging from 0-272

Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Physical Activity Measured With Accelerometers
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Number of Steps per day.
Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Intervention dependent changes in brain structure i.e. gray matter volume measured as voxels Analyses defined as: were there any significant clusters of voxels explained by the interaction of group and time. In other words, were there significant changes in voxel activity that depended on the interventions when using a cluster-based threshold using group statistics..

Note that it is not possible to report this outcome per group. Additionally, MR statistics are not reported as measures of central tendency such as the mean or any alternatives provided.

Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Task-induced Brain Activity as Measured by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Intervention dependent changes in task-induced brain activity, voxel-wise analyses of whole brain. (Name of the task performed during fMRI; the serial reaction time task.)

Analyses defined as: were there any significant clusters of voxels explained by the interaction of group and time. In other words, were there significant changes in voxel activity that depended on the interventions when using a cluster-based threshold. The measure type number was chosen because we estimated the number of significant clusters of voxels. Group statistics were perfromed

Note that for task fMRI interaction analyses, there are no meaningful values to report for the groups respectively.

Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Wet Biomarkers
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks
Mature Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (mBDNF) in serum
Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dysarthria
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline
The Dysarthria Assessment also includes the Questionnaire on Acquired Speech Disorders (QASD, Swedish: Självsvarsformulär om Förvärvade Talstörningar) which is a self-report instrument that captures the subjective symptoms and experiences of individuals living with acquired speech disorders. Three subscales are included: "My Speech and Language", "Speech and Language in Social Interaction", and "Personal and Environmental Factors". Each item is rated on a four-point scale from 0 (definitely false) to 3 (definitely true), with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The overall QASD score was determined by calculating the average score of all sub-scales.
Pre intervention baseline
Voice Strength
Time Frame: Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

The recordings were performed according to standardised routines for high-quality recordings in a sound-proof recording studio with the equipment Sony Digital Audio Tape Deck DTC-ZE700 and the software Sopran (version 1.0.22 © Tolvan Data). Measures were performed by a speech and language pathologist.

The outcome measure from the studio recordings used in the present study was mean voice sound level (dB SPL) in reading a Swedish standardised text.

Pre intervention baseline and post intervention at 10 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Maria Eriksdotter, Professor, Karolinska Institutet, NVS department

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 13, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 11, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Currently we do not have IRB for sharing.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Physical Activity

Clinical Trials on HiBalance

Subscribe