- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03222466
Patient Educational Materials for Prostate Cancer Screening
October 30, 2017 updated by: Unity Health Toronto
A Randomized Trial to Assess Whether Co-creating Patient Educational Materials With Patients Has Added Value Over Researchers and Clinicians Developing Patient Education Materials and Engaging Patients During Usability Testing Only.
Although the harms of screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test outweigh the benefits, 560,000 Ontario men undergo PSA screening each year.
Guideline developers, such as the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care (CTFPHC), have disseminated patient educational materials (PEMs) on PSA screening widely in Ontario, yet men remain confused about screening harms and benefits.
One potential contributing factor may be that PEMs are typically developed by researchers and clinicians and may not address patient barriers to change.
The investigators will assess whether a PSA screening PEM that is co-created with patients provides added value over PEMs developed using the traditional approach (i.e., researchers and clinicians develop a PEM with patient involvement in usability testing only.
The investigators will also assess satisfaction with the engagement process and calculate the costs and resources required for each method (i.e.
co-creation, usability, and recommendations only).
This study will generate a PSA screening PEM to help patients make evidence-based screening decisions.
It will also help Ontario organizations, including Cancer Care Ontario, identify optimal methods for developing PEMs for PSA screening and other areas of preventive health care, such as breast and colorectal cancer screening.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
573
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8
- St. Michael's Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- English-speaking men aged 40+ years will be eligible to take part in the project if they have never been diagnosed with prostate cancer and do not have any signs or symptoms of prostate cancer.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals will not be eligible for the project if they indicate that they are a health care professional or have any conflicts of interest relevant to the guideline topic (e.g., owning shares in a company related to prostate cancer treatment).
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Co-created PEM
A co-created PEM has been designed in collaboration with patients.
Participants receiving the intervention will be asked to read and answer questions before and after viewing the co-created PEM.
|
A co-created PEM has been designed in collaboration with patients.
|
|
No Intervention: Traditional PEM
Participants will be asked to read and answer questions before and after viewing the traditional PEM created by clinicians and researchers.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pretest-posttest change in prostate cancer screening decisional conflict and intention to be screened between the co-created PEM group and the traditional PEM group.
Time Frame: This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month.
|
The investigators will assess differences and changes in prostate cancer screening decisional conflict and intention to be screened for the co-created PEM group and the traditional PEM group using repeated measures ANOVAs.
|
This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pretest-posttest change in knowledge of prostate cancer screening
Time Frame: This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month.
|
The investigators will assess the differences in the pretest-posttest change in prostate cancer screening knowledge between the co-created PEM group and the traditional PEM group using a 7-item knowledge measure.
Assessed by conducting a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).
|
This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month.
|
|
Comparison of PEM usability
Time Frame: This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month.
|
The investigators will assess the differences between the two study arms in PEM/recommendation usability using a one-way ANOVA
|
This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month.
|
|
Participant preference of PEM
Time Frame: This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month
|
The investigators will evaluate participants' preferred material (co-created or traditional PEM).
Use a chi-square test to analyze the difference in the proportion of patients who prefer each type of material.
|
This measure will be assessed from date of randomization until date of survey completion, assessed up to 1 month
|
|
Resources use for PEM development
Time Frame: This measure will be assessed after the intervention (survey) is administered (i.e., post analysis), up to 1 month.
|
The investigators will record the resources required (e.g., personnel hours and participant reimbursement) for a health care organization to develop a co-created PEM in comparison to a PEM created by clinicians and researchers.
|
This measure will be assessed after the intervention (survey) is administered (i.e., post analysis), up to 1 month.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
October 6, 2017
Primary Completion (Actual)
October 27, 2017
Study Completion (Actual)
October 27, 2017
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 11, 2017
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 17, 2017
First Posted (Actual)
July 19, 2017
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
November 1, 2017
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 30, 2017
Last Verified
October 1, 2017
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- SMH REB #:16-376
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patient Educational Materials
-
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial...RecruitingPatient Simulation | Educational ActivitiesTaiwan
-
Hospital for Special Surgery, New YorkRecruitingHealth Literacy | Patient Comprehension | Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Patient Educational MaterialUnited States
-
University of JordanJordan University HospitalNot yet recruitingWound Healing | Patient Comfort | Suture Materials | Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
-
The University of Texas Health Science Center,...CompletedMedical Education | Patient Safety | Educational Safety Curriculum | Surgical Resident
-
University of California, San FranciscoState University of New York - Upstate Medical University; University of RochesterRecruitingPatient Satisfaction | HoLEP | Educational Video InterventionUnited States
-
Çankırı Karatekin UniversityNot yet recruitingRandomized Controlled Trial | Nursing Students | Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Patient Education Materials
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaRecruitingEducational Materials (ST-NEPCO) During Nutrition Counselling for Obese ChildrenMalaysia
-
Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center...RecruitingPatient Satisfaction | Fracture | Pediatric | Orthopedic Devices Associated With Misadventures, Surgical Instruments, Materials and Devices (Including Sutures)United States
-
Acibadem UniversityEnrolling by invitationEmergencies | Educational Problems | Virtual PatientTurkey
-
Parc de Salut MarCompletedColonic Diseases | Nurse-Patient Relations | Educational ProblemsSpain
Clinical Trials on Co-created PEM
-
University Rovira i VirgiliConsell Comarcal del Priorat; Fundación Española para la ciencia y la tecnologiaNot yet recruiting
-
Sykehuset TelemarkUniversity of Oslo; Lund University; Oslo University Hospital; University of Minnesota and other collaboratorsCompletedCerebral PalsyCanada, United States, Sweden, Finland, Norway
-
Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la...Merck Sharp & Dohme LLCUnknown
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustRecruitingProlapse; Female | Prolapse, VaginalUnited Kingdom
-
Glasgow Caledonian UniversityCompletedPhysical Activity | Sedentary Behaviour | Care Home ResidentsUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de ElcheUniversidad de Murcia; Erasmus Medical Center; Thomas More University of Applied... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingProstate Cancer | Health LiteracySpain
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRocky Mountain Human ServicesActive, not recruitingDevelopmental Disabilities | Developmental DelayUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Mary A KhetaniMcGill University; McMaster UniversityCompletedDevelopmental Disability | Early Intervention (Education)