Comparison Between Two Different High Power Ablative Lasers in the Treatment of Oral Leukoplakia

July 25, 2017 updated by: Dragana Gabrić, University of Zagreb
Oral leukoplakia is a precancerous lesion with relatively high malignant transformation potential. They are often treated by wide surgical excisions or conservative retinoids therapy. The use of high power ablative lasers has been proposed as an effective way of treating these lesions safely. The aim of this study was to evaluate efficiency Er:YAG and Er,Cr:YSGG laser, in the treatment of oral leukoplakia.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The purpose of this research was to determine the effectiveness of two high-power ablative lasers in the treatment of oral leukoplakia. Furthermore, the purpose was to compare reciprocally and evaluate the subjective and objective postoperative parameters for two different tested ablative lasers, Er: YAG and Er, Cr: YSGG.

All the patients were referred to the Department of Oral Medicine or Oral Surgery where a biopsy and measuring the size of lesion that meet the criteria of the histopathological diagnosis of leukoplakia was performed. Patients who met the conditions of pathohistological diagnosis of leukoplakia and clinical criteria for diagnosis of non-homogeneous leukoplakia, were included in the research.

The patients were randomly allocated into one of the two test groups. In the first group of patients leukoplakia lesion were removed using high-power ablative laser Er: YAG and to those in the second group using high power ablative Er, Cr: YSGG laser.

The patients were monitored one year and six months after treatment to evaluate subjective and objective parameters focused on life quality after treatment and in case of eventual relapse. Criteria of effectiveness for lasers were appearance of relaps in one year and six months following.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • based clinically diagnosed non homogeneous leukoplakia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • immunocompromised patients
  • HIV positive patients
  • patients on suppressive therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients with diagnosed leukoplakia 1

Patients who meet the conditions of pathohistological diagnosis of leukoplakia and clinical criteria for diagnosis of non-homogeneous leukoplakia.

Intervention using Er:YAG laser

Ablation of the lesions Device: Er:YAG laser (LightWalker AT, Fotona, Slovenia, 2013) with a non-contact X-Runner digitally controled hand-piece.

Settings for the Er:YAG laser were as follows: pulse mode was Quantum Square Pulse (QSP), pulse energy of 120mJ, frequency of 20Hz and water sprey level was set to10ml per minute.

Experimental: Patients with diagnosed leukoplakia 2

Patients who meet the conditions of pathohistological diagnosis of leukoplakia and clinical criteria for diagnosis of non-homogeneous leukoplakia.

Intervention using Er,Cr:YSGG laser

Ablation of the lesions Device: Er,Cr:YSGG laser(WaterLase iPlus, Biolase LTD, USA) using contact mode. Settings were subsequent: power 50W, frequency 50Hz and concentration ratio of air and water was 2:4.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rate
Time Frame: 6 months period
At a recall visit after six months there were no recurrence of all leukoplakia which were ablated by use of Er:YAG and Er;Cr:YSGG laser.
6 months period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Dr. Dragana Gabrić, University of Zagreb

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2017

Last Verified

July 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Leukoplakic Lesions

Clinical Trials on Er:YAG laser

Subscribe